Linux CPU Freq
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- RFC: sunsetting the cpufreq list
- From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- cpufreq-info SIGKILL or freeze unkillable in read(.../cpu0/cpufreq/stats/time_in_state)
- From: Jonas Bechtel <post@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Fwd: Intel_pstate locked lowest mhz
- From: Terry M <zecatfish@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: can not seem to set cpufreq to max performance with newer kernels for xeons X56xx
- From: Jelle de Jong <jelledejong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- can not seem to set cpufreq to max performance with newer kernels for xeons X56xx
- From: Jelle de Jong <jelledejong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- can not seem to set cpufreq to max performance with newer kernels
- From: Jelle de Jong <jelledejong@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Setting minimal cpu fequencies
- From: Bernard KORSEC <bernard.korsec@xxxxxxxxx>
- bug userspace
- From: Mister Goo <goobubble@xxxxxxxxx>
- scaling governor kernel 4.14.40 vs 4.17.rc
- From: abhishek koundal <akoundal@xxxxxxxxx>
- Unexpected outcome using cpufreq-set on Xeon Platinum CPU
- From: Jeffrey Lane <jeffrey.lane@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- current policy: frequency should be within 1.50 GHz and 1.50 GHz.
- From: Klaudio Zic <vnn2017@xxxxxxxxx>
- cpufreq debian 9, intel i7 908x
- From: Micha W <cellmw@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/34] cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 07/34] cpufreq: cris: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()
- From: Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@xxxxxxxx>
- CPU frequency governor problem
- From: Edward Statham <edward.statham@xxxxxxxxx>
- Godaveri
- From: <jan.weber@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cpufrequtils: Report offline cpus in cpufreq-info
- From: Akshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] Integrator DTS and defconfig changes
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] Integrator DTS and defconfig changes
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] Integrator DTS and defconfig changes
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [GIT PULL] Integrator DTS and defconfig changes
- From: Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx>
- [GIT PULL] Integrator DTS and defconfig changes
- From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 101241] cpufreq ondemand does not work on AMD GX-416RA SOC
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 101241] cpufreq ondemand does not work on AMD GX-416RA SOC
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- amd9590
- From: Richard Jasmin <richardjasmin123@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add Broadcom BCM2835 CPU frequency control driver
- From: Eric Anholt <eric@xxxxxxxxxx>
- hotplug governor
- From: Sriram V <vshrirama@xxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 71841] cpufreq ondemand ignore_nice_load doesn't work
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 71841] cpufreq ondemand ignore_nice_load doesn't work
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 71841] cpufreq ondemand ignore_nice_load doesn't work
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 65501] Blind angle of 1% between up_threshold and down_threshold
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 65501] Blind angle of 1% between up_threshold and down_threshold
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 65501] Blind angle of 1% between up_threshold and down_threshold
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 100771] When activating ignore_nice_load with governor ondemand performance drops for normal processes.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 100771] When activating ignore_nice_load with governor ondemand performance drops for normal processes.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 100771] When activating ignore_nice_load with governor ondemand performance drops for normal processes.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 71841] cpufreq ondemand ignore_nice_load doesn't work
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 71841] cpufreq ondemand ignore_nice_load doesn't work
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 100771] When activating ignore_nice_load with governor ondemand performance drops for normal processes.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 100771] When activating ignore_nice_load with governor ondemand performance drops for normal processes.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 100771] When activating ignore_nice_load with governor ondemand performance drops for normal processes.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 69821] setting CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC locks cpu at the lowest frequency using ONDEMAND
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 69821] setting CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC locks cpu at the lowest frequency using ONDEMAND
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 69821] setting CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC locks cpu at the lowest frequency using ONDEMAND
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 69821] setting CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC locks cpu at the lowest frequency using ONDEMAND
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 101241] cpufreq ondemand does not work on AMD GX-416RA SOC
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Changing CPU frequency in atomic (schedule / scheduler_tick)
- From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@xxxxxxx>
- Help
- From: Don Malachia <don.malachia@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: issues on driver CPU
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- issues on driver CPU
- From: Lorenzo Scattolin <lorenzo.scattolin04@xxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 101241] cpufreq ondemand not work in my system
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 101241] cpufreq ondemand not work in my system
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 65501] Blind angle of 1% between up_threshold and down_threshold
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH v6 2/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Fix the FSB feq for Airmont
- From: plongepe <philippe.longepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2 1/2] cpufreq: intel_pstate: Replace BYT by ATOM
- From: plongepe <philippe.longepe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: Add Broadcom BCM2835 CPU frequency control driver
- From: Stephen Warren <swarren@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cpufreq: Add Broadcom BCM2835 CPU frequency control driver
- From: Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@xxxxx>
- Proposition D'Affaires:
- From: Mong-Hoi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- RE: cpufreq doesn't work quite on Dell GX520 with Pentium D at 2.80gHz
- From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@xxxxxxxxx>
- cpufreq doesn't work quite on Dell GX520 with Pentium D at 2.80gHz
- From: Deirdre Kylie <kylie.deirdre@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about system time incorrect after changing cpu frequency
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about system time incorrect after changing cpu frequency
- From: vichy <vichy.kuo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about system time incorrect after changing cpu frequency
- From: vichy <vichy.kuo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about system time incorrect after changing cpu frequency
- From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about system time incorrect after changing cpu frequency
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about system time incorrect after changing cpu frequency
- From: vichy <vichy.kuo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: about system time incorrect after changing cpu frequency
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- about system time incorrect after changing cpu frequency
- From: vichy <vichy.kuo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: some question about cpubench
- From: vichy <vichy.kuo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Changing CPU frequency in atomic (schedule / scheduler_tick)
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Changing CPU frequency in atomic (schedule / scheduler_tick)
- From: Guru Prasad <gurupras@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Changing CPU frequency in atomic (schedule / scheduler_tick)
- From: Guru Prasad <gurupras@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Changing CPU frequency in atomic (schedule / scheduler_tick)
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Changing CPU frequency in atomic (schedule / scheduler_tick)
- From: Guru Prasad <gurupras@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Using a temperature sensor with 1-bit output for CPU throttling
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Using a temperature sensor with 1-bit output for CPU throttling
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- [Bug 75121] Intel Pstate driver - powersave mode - CPU frequency too low
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Using a temperature sensor with 1-bit output for CPU throttling
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Using a temperature sensor with 1-bit output for CPU throttling
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- [Bug 101241] New: cpufreq ondemand not work in my system
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 100771] When activating ignore_nice_load with governor ondemand performance drops for normal processes.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Clock speed Display bug when underclocked.
- From: James Phillips <kernel.org@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: qoriq: optimize the CPU frequency switching time
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cpufreq: qoriq: optimize the CPU frequency switching time
- From: <Yuantian.Tang@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Using a temperature sensor with 1-bit output for CPU throttling
- From: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Using a temperature sensor with 1-bit output for CPU throttling
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Using a temperature sensor with 1-bit output for CPU throttling
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- schedule_timeout sleeps too long after dividing CPU frequency
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Using a temperature sensor with 1-bit output for CPU throttling
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- Using a temperature sensor with 1-bit output for CPU throttling
- From: Mason <slash.tmp@xxxxxxx>
- [Bug 91141] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU - AMD Athlon(tm) 5150 APU with Radeon(tm) R3
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU - AMD Athlon(tm) 5150 APU with Radeon(tm) R3
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re:do not need a prescription
- From: "Ryan" <order@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 60587] Only two p-states visible on AMD FX-8350
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: cpufreq-info and acpi-cpufreq: reporting MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL as "actual frequency"
- From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 91141] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: cpuidle vs suspend vs something else
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Stefan Agner <stefan@xxxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cpuidle vs suspend vs something else
- From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: cpuidle vs suspend vs something else
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- cpuidle vs suspend vs something else
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Måns Rullgård <mans@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Delays, clocks, timers, hrtimers, etc
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- linux-next: tidy up of trees
- From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 91141] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Javi Merino <javi.merino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RFC on cpufreq implementation
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- [Bug 91141] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 91141] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 91141] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 91141] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 91141] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 91141] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 91141] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] input: CPU frequency booster
- From: Pavel Machek <pavel@xxxxxx>
- [Bug 91141] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 91141] acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 91141] New: acpi-cpufreq cannot be loaded.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: cpufreq-info and acpi-cpufreq: reporting MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL as "actual frequency"
- From: Magdalena Dobosz <maj.dobosz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cpufreq-info and acpi-cpufreq: reporting MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL as "actual frequency"
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cpufreq-info and acpi-cpufreq: reporting MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL as "actual frequency"
- From: Magdalena Dobosz <maj.dobosz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cpufreq-info and acpi-cpufreq: reporting MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL as "actual frequency"
- From: Dirk Brandewie <dirk.brandewie@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cpufreq-info and acpi-cpufreq: reporting MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL as "actual frequency"
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How many frequencies would cpufreq optimally like to manage?
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How many frequencies would cpufreq optimally like to manage?
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- cpufreq-info and acpi-cpufreq: reporting MSR_IA32_PERF_CTL as "actual frequency"
- From: Magdalena Dobosz <maj.dobosz@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How many frequencies would cpufreq optimally like to manage?
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How many frequencies would cpufreq optimally like to manage?
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: Race condition in cpufreq
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How many frequencies would cpufreq optimally like to manage?
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: How many frequencies would cpufreq optimally like to manage?
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Re: How many frequencies would cpufreq optimally like to manage?
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- How many frequencies would cpufreq optimally like to manage?
- From: Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx>
- Race condition in cpufreq
- From: Arun KS <arunks.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU - AMD Athlon(tm) 5150 APU with Radeon(tm) R3
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 83701] divide error 0000 in intel_pstate_set_pstate
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 62551] AMD Phenom II 955.: The system freezes for a moment when the CPU scaling is enabled
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 86461] intel_pstate does not obey min/max frequencies set by user
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU - AMD Athlon(tm) 5150 APU with Radeon(tm) R3
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 71841] cpufreq ondemand ignore_nice_load doesn't work
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 86461] intel_pstate does not obey min/max frequencies set by user
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 58001] "ondemand" CPU governor never raises frequency (Dell XPS 12)
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 86461] intel_pstate does not obey min/max frequencies set by user
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 86461] intel_pstate does not obey min/max frequencies set by user
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 86461] intel_pstate does not obey min/max frequencies set by user
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 86461] intel_pstate does not obey min/max frequencies set by user
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 86461] intel_pstate does not obey min/max frequencies set by user
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 86461] New: intel_pstate does not obey min/max frequencies set by user
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [cpufreq] 48ed83b84da: scaling_governor write error
- From: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS
- From: Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Potential cpufreq backports for v3.10 LTS
- From: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cpufreq dir under /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu* is not present for online=0 cpus
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Stefan Wahren <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 58001] "ondemand" CPU governor never raises frequency (Dell XPS 12)
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 58001] "ondemand" CPU governor never raises frequency (Dell XPS 12)
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 58001] "ondemand" CPU governor never raises frequency (Dell XPS 12)
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 58001] "ondemand" CPU governor never raises frequency (Dell XPS 12)
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 58001] "ondemand" CPU governor never raises frequency (Dell XPS 12)
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 58001] "ondemand" CPU governor never raises frequency (Dell XPS 12)
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Stefan Wahren <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- cpufreq dir under /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu* is not present for online=0 cpus
- From: Ragu <raguramanmm@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Stefan Wahren <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 58001] "ondemand" CPU governor never raises frequency (Dell XPS 12)
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 56071] Ondemand doesn't set correct low frequency
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 73421] intel/p_state Does not increase into Turbo Boost states and does not display all governors. i5-3201M
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 84851] CPU scaled down to 600 MHz even under load
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 84851] New: CPU scaled down to 600 MHz even under load
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- cpufreq values displayed 20% high on Intel J1900 BayTrail CPU
- From: Grant Coady <gcoady.lk@xxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 65671] Asus A8V deluxe(AMD): hibernation - IO errors writing to swap, crashing apps, 3,11.8 worked, unless rmmod powernow_k8
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 71841] AMD64:ignore_nice_load ignores real load
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 83701] divide error 0000 in intel_pstate_set_pstate
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: cpufreq-info
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Stefan Wahren <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 83701] New: divide error 0000 in intel_pstate_set_pstate
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- cpufreq-info
- From: Jean Oberson <jo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Stefan Wahren <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Fabio Estevam <festevam@xxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 83151] Intel Turbo can't be disabled/enabled under certain condictions
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 83151] Intel Turbo can't be disabled/enabled under certain condictions
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 83151] Intel Turbo can't be disabled/enabled under certain condictions
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Stefan Wahren <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 83151] New: Intel Turbo can't be disabled/enabled under certain condictions
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- ARM: mx28: cpufreq-cpu0 support?
- From: Stefan Wahren <info@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 72361] AMD APU reset infinite
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Len Brown <lenb@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 3/3] CPPC: Add ACPI accessors to CPC registers
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 2/3] CPPC: Add support for Collaborative Processor Performance Control
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 1/3] ACPI: Add support for Platform Communication Channel
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 1/3] ACPI: Add support for Platform Communication Channel
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 3/3] CPPC: Add ACPI accessors to CPC registers
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 2/3] CPPC: Add support for Collaborative Processor Performance Control
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC 0/3] Experimental patchset for CPPC
- From: Ashwin Chaugule <ashwin.chaugule@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 62551] AMD Phenom II 955.: The system freezes for a moment when the CPU scaling is enabled
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 75661] AMD A8-4500M: acpi-cpufreq cannot use lowest reported P-state
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 62551] AMD Phenom II 955.: The system freezes for a moment when the CPU scaling is enabled
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 81131] Not found this subsystem directory /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81701] New: OOPS in cpufreq driver with AMD Kaveri CPU
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 75661] AMD A8-4500M: acpi-cpufreq cannot use lowest reported P-state
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 71841] AMD64:ignore_nice_load ignores real load
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 65671] Asus A8V deluxe(AMD): hibernation - IO errors writing to swap, crashing apps, 3,11.8 worked, unless rmmod powernow_k8
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81131] Not found this subsystem directory /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81021] AMD CPUs w/ Integrated Graphics (APUs) And Turbo Core Only Boost If "fglrx" Module Is Loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 62551] AMD Phenom II 955.: The system freezes for a moment when the CPU scaling is enabled
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81131] New: Not found this subsystem directory /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpufreq
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 81021] New: AMD CPUs w/ Integrated Graphics (APUs) And Turbo Core Only Boost If "fglrx" Module Is Loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: "Javi Merino" <javi.merino@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 72361] AMD APU reset infinite
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 80651] [intel_pstate] pstate settings are lost during suspend/resume cycle
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 80651] [intel_pstate] pstate settings are lost during suspend/resume cycle
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 80651] [intel_pstate] pstate settings are lost during suspend/resume cycle
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 80651] [intel_pstate] pstate settings are lost during suspend/resume cycle
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 80651] [intel_pstate] pstate settings are lost during suspend/resume cycle
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 80651] New: [intel_pstate] pstate settings are lost during suspend/resume cycle
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: Sachin Kamat <spk.linux@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cpufreq: tests: Providing cpufreq regression test
- From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 72361] AMD APU reset infinite
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: RFC: Leave sysfs nodes alone during hotplug
- From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Leave sysfs nodes alone during hotplug
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Leave sysfs nodes alone during hotplug
- From: skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: RFC: Leave sysfs nodes alone during hotplug
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Leave sysfs nodes alone during hotplug
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Leave sysfs nodes alone during hotplug
- From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Leave sysfs nodes alone during hotplug
- From: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Leave sysfs nodes alone during hotplug
- From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: RFC: Leave sysfs nodes alone during hotplug
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RFC: Leave sysfs nodes alone during hotplug
- From: Saravana Kannan <skannan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: Introduce 'clk_find_nearest_rate()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: Introduce 'clk_find_nearest_rate()'
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: Introduce 'clk_find_nearest_rate()'
- From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: Introduce 'clk_find_nearest_rate()'
- From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: Introduce 'clk_find_nearest_rate()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/4] clk: Introduce 'clk_find_nearest_rate()'
- From: Boris BREZILLON <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 72361] AMD APU reset infinite
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 0/4] Introduce clk_find_nearest_rate()
- From: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] clk: Introduce 'clk_find_nearest_rate()'
- From: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 4/4] ARM: zynq: dt: Use properly rounded frequencies in OPPs
- From: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] net: macb: Use clk_find_nearest_rate() API
- From: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] cpufreq: cpu0: Use clk_find_nearest_rate()
- From: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: amit daniel kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 77771] Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: Arjun K V <arjunkv243@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 3/6] clk: exynos: use cpu-clock provider type to represent arm clock
- From: amit daniel kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 1/6] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: amit daniel kachhap <amit.daniel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 77771] Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77771] Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77771] Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77771] Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v6 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 6/6] cpufreq: exynos: remove exynos4210/5250 specific cpufreq driver support
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 5/6] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq driver for exynos4210/5250
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 4/6] ARM: dts: Exynos: add cpu nodes, opp and cpu clock configuration data
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 3/6] clk: exynos: use cpu-clock provider type to represent arm clock
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 2/6] clk: samsung: register exynos5420 apll/kpll configuration data
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 1/6] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v6 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers for exynos platforms
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 77771] Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77771] Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77771] Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77771] Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77951] "intel_pstate: Set turbo VID for BayTrail" causes stall on Intel NUC DN2820FYKH
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77951] "intel_pstate: Set turbo VID for BayTrail" causes stall on Intel NUC DN2820FYKH
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77951] New: "intel_pstate: Set turbo VID for BayTrail" causes stall on Intel NUC DN2820FYKH
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77771] Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77771] Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77771] Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: Use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for Exynos3250
- From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: Use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for Exynos3250
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: Use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for Exynos3250
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 77771] Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [PATCH 4/4] ARM: dts: Exynos: Add cpu clock table and armclk divider table for Exynos3250
- From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3/4] Documentation: devicetree: Add cpu clock configuration data binding for Exynos3250
- From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/4] clk: samsung: Add support for cpu clocks of Exynos3250
- From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/4] clk: samsung: exynos3250: Use cpu-clock provider type to support cpufreq
- From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 0/4] cpufreq: Use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for Exynos3250
- From: Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 77771] New: Intel P-State: Constantly changing CPU frequencies on idle system.
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 77201] CPU online hangs, works when powernow-k8 is UN-loaded
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] longhaul: Mark it as dangerous in Kconfig
- From: Rafał Bilski <rafalbilski@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] e_powersaver: Require setting a module parameter to enable it
- From: Rafał Bilski <rafalbilski@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 72361] AMD APU reset infinite
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH 2/2] e_powersaver: Require setting a module parameter to enable it
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] longhaul: Mark it as dangerous in Kconfig
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 72361] AMD APU reset infinite
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 72361] AMD APU reset infinite
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] longhaul: Mark it as dangerous in Kconfig
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] longhaul: Mark it as dangerous in Kconfig
- From: Dave Jones <davej@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] e_powersaver: Require setting a module parameter to enable it
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] longhaul: Mark it as dangerous in Kconfig
- From: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [patch NOT added to the 3.12 stable tree] MIPS/loongson2_cpufreq: Fix CPU clock rate setting
- From: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@xxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cpufreq: ppc-corenet-cpu-freq: do_div use quotient
- From: Ed Swarthout <Ed.Swarthout@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ppc-corenet-cpu-freq: do_div use quotient
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ppc-corenet-cpu-freq: do_div use quotient
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 3.14 003/228] MIPS/loongson2_cpufreq: Fix CPU clock rate setting
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cpufreq: ppc-corenet-cpu-freq: do_div use quotient
- From: Ed Swarthout <Ed.Swarthout@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 75121] Intel Pstate driver - powersave mode - CPU frequency too low
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 75661] acpi-cpufreq cannot use lowest reported P-state (A8-4500M)
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 75661] acpi-cpufreq cannot use lowest reported P-state (A8-4500M)
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 72361] AMD APU reset infinite
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 69821] setting CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC locks cpu at the lowest frequency using ONDEMAND
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 65501] Blind angle of 1% between up_threshold and down_threshold
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- [Bug 62551] The system freezes for a moment when the CPU scaling is enabled
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Performance regression in v3.14
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Performance regression in v3.14
- From: Johan Hovold <jhovold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Performance regression in v3.14
- From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Performance regression in v3.14
- From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@xxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 75121] Intel Pstate driver - powersave mode - CPU frequency too low
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- RE: Performance regression in v3.14
- From: "Doug Smythies" <dsmythies@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Performance regression in v3.14
- From: Yuyang Du <yuyang.du@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Performance regression in v3.14
- From: Johan Hovold <jhovold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] Documentation: devicetree: add cpu clock configuration data binding for Exynos4/5
- From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 7/7] cpufreq: exynos: remove all exynos specific cpufreq driver support
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 6/7] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 1/7] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: allow use of optional boost mode frequencies
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] Documentation: devicetree: add cpu clock configuration data binding for Exynos4/5
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v5 0/7] cpufreq: use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for exynos based platforms
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] cpufreq: use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for exynos based platforms
- From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] cpufreq: use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for exynos based platforms
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [Bug 72361] AMD APU reset infinite
- From: bugzilla-daemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: s5pv210: drop check for CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE
- From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: s5pv210: drop check for CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] cpufreq: s5pv210: drop check for CONFIG_PM_VERBOSE
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 7/7] cpufreq: exynos: remove all exynos specific cpufreq driver support
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 6/7] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 5/7] ARM: dts: Exynos: add cpu nodes, opp and cpu clock configuration data
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 4/7] clk: exynos: use cpu-clock provider type to represent arm clock
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 3/7] Documentation: devicetree: add cpu clock configuration data binding for Exynos4/5
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 2/7] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 1/7] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: allow use of optional boost mode frequencies
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v5 0/7] cpufreq: use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for exynos based platforms
- From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove unused call of pr_err()
- From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove unused call of pr_err()
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove unused call of pr_err()
- From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove unused call of pr_err()
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove unused call of pr_err()
- From: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cpufreq: s5pv210: remove unused call of pr_err()
- From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end
- From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Performance regression in v3.14
- From: Johan Hovold <jhovold@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: powernv: make local function static
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: remove race while accessing cur_policy
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cpufreq: remove race while accessing cur_policy
- From: Bibek Basu <bbasu@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpu0: drop wrong devm usage
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 0/8] cpufreq: use cpufreq-cpu0 driver for exynos based platforms
- From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver
- From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] Documentation: devicetree: add cpu clock configuration data binding for Exynos4/5
- From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] clk: exynos: use cpu-clock provider type to represent arm clock.
- From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 4/8] Documentation: devicetree: add cpu clock configuration data binding for Exynos4/5
- From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 6/8] ARM: dts: Exynos: add cpu nodes, opp and cpu clock configuration data
- From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpu0: drop wrong devm usage
- From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] clk: samsung: change scope of samsung clock lock to global
- From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: cpu0: drop wrong devm usage
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cpufreq: cpu0: drop wrong devm usage
- From: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v3] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v2] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@xxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- RE: [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH v2] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH] cpufreq: exynos: Fix the compile error
- From: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] clk: exynos: use cpu-clock provider type to represent arm clock.
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 3/8] clk: samsung: add infrastructure to register cpu clocks
- From: Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Format of patches
- From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Frequency resolution in CCF vs. cpufreq
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Frequency resolution in CCF vs. cpufreq
- From: Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Format of patches (was: [PATCH 1/2] speedstep-smi: enable interrupts when waiting)
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: Format of patches (was: [PATCH 1/2] speedstep-smi: enable interrupts when waiting)
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Frequency resolution in CCF vs. cpufreq
- From: Nishanth Menon <nm@xxxxxx>
- Re: Format of patches (was: [PATCH 1/2] speedstep-smi: enable interrupts when waiting)
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Format of patches (was: [PATCH 1/2] speedstep-smi: enable interrupts when waiting)
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] clk: exynos: use cpu-clock provider type to represent arm clock.
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] clk: exynos: use cpu-clock provider type to represent arm clock.
- From: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] clk: exynos: use cpu-clock provider type to represent arm clock.
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Frequency resolution in CCF vs. cpufreq
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Frequency resolution in CCF vs. cpufreq
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH 1/2] speedstep-smi: enable interrupts when waiting
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 1/5] cpufreq: stats: Allow small rounding errors
- From: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 3/5] cpufreq: cpu0: Use clk_round_rate_nearest()
- From: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 2/5] clk: Introduce 'clk_round_rate_nearest()'
- From: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 4/5] ARM: zynq: dt: Use properly rounded frequencies in OPPs
- From: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 5/5] net: macb: Use clk_round_rate_nearest() API
- From: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [RFC PATCH 0/5] Frequency resolution in CCF vs. cpufreq
- From: Soren Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 5/8] clk: exynos: use cpu-clock provider type to represent arm clock.
- From: Mike Turquette <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 2/2] speedstep: clean up interrupt disabling
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- [PATCH 1/2] speedstep-smi: enable interrupts when waiting
- From: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: allow use of optional boost mode frequencies
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: allow use of optional boost mode frequencies
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver
- From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] cpufreq: exynos: remove all exynos specific cpufreq driver support
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: allow use of optional boost mode frequencies
- From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver
- From: Rob Herring <robherring2@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 1/8] cpufreq: cpufreq-cpu0: allow use of optional boost mode frequencies
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 2/8] clk: samsung: change scope of samsung clock lock to global
- From: Thomas Abraham <ta.omasab@xxxxxxxxx>
- Re: [PATCH v4 7/8] ARM: Exynos: switch to using generic cpufreq-cpu0 driver
- From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx>
[Index of Archives]
[Linux Kernel Devel]
[Linux USB Devel]
[Linux SCSI]
[Samba]
[Yosemite News]