Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 06:02:51 PM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 05/05/2014 02:39 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> > On 05/05/2014 02:23 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Changes in v3:
> >>> Expanded the comment in the code to briefly mention why ASYNC_NOTIFICATION
> >>> drivers are left out from the check, as suggested by Gautham R. Shenoy.
> >>> No code changes in this version.
> >>>
> >>> v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/29/283
> >>> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/28/469
> >>
> >> Seems to work on VIA EPIA with 3.15-rc2 (no other cpufreq fixes):
> >>
> > 
> > Great! Thanks a lot for testing this!
> > 
> > Rafael/Viresh, can you please add Meelis' Tested-by while taking
> > this patch?
> 
> Rafael, any thoughts on this patch?
> 
> It has been Acked by Viresh and tested by Meelis. Hope you'll consider
> picking up this patch for 3.16.

It should be in linux-next today AFAICS.

Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux