Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On 05/21/2014 06:31 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 21, 2014 06:02:51 PM Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>> On 05/05/2014 02:39 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
>>> On 05/05/2014 02:23 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>>>>> Changes in v3:
>>>>> Expanded the comment in the code to briefly mention why ASYNC_NOTIFICATION
>>>>> drivers are left out from the check, as suggested by Gautham R. Shenoy.
>>>>> No code changes in this version.
>>>>> v2:
>>>>> v1:
>>>> Seems to work on VIA EPIA with 3.15-rc2 (no other cpufreq fixes):
>>> Great! Thanks a lot for testing this!
>>> Rafael/Viresh, can you please add Meelis' Tested-by while taking
>>> this patch?
>> Rafael, any thoughts on this patch?
>> It has been Acked by Viresh and tested by Meelis. Hope you'll consider
>> picking up this patch for 3.16.
> It should be in linux-next today AFAICS.

Oops, I did check your tree before asking, but I'm not sure how I missed
this. Now I'm able to see the patch in your bleeding-edge branch. Sorry
for the noise!

Srivatsa S. Bhat

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux