Re: [PATCH v3] cpufreq: Catch double invocations of cpufreq_freq_transition_begin/end

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 05/05/2014 02:39 PM, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:
> On 05/05/2014 02:23 PM, Meelis Roos wrote:
>>>
>>> Changes in v3:
>>> Expanded the comment in the code to briefly mention why ASYNC_NOTIFICATION
>>> drivers are left out from the check, as suggested by Gautham R. Shenoy.
>>> No code changes in this version.
>>>
>>> v2: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/29/283
>>> v1: https://lkml.org/lkml/2014/4/28/469
>>
>> Seems to work on VIA EPIA with 3.15-rc2 (no other cpufreq fixes):
>>
> 
> Great! Thanks a lot for testing this!
> 
> Rafael/Viresh, can you please add Meelis' Tested-by while taking
> this patch?

Rafael, any thoughts on this patch?

It has been Acked by Viresh and tested by Meelis. Hope you'll consider
picking up this patch for 3.16.

Thank you!

Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux