Re: [RFC PATCH 0/5] Frequency resolution in CCF vs. cpufreq

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Thu, May 15, 2014 at 2:47 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> cpufreq, which simply divides values it obtains through clk_round_rate() by
>> 1000, 666666.
>> Since passing 666666 to clk_round_rate() does not result in 666666660
>> (clk_round_rate() always rounds down!), we chose to put 666667 in the OPP. This
> What is OPP?

Operating Performance Point (Documentation/power/opp.txt describes
frequencies in Hz, the bindings we chose in the community
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/power/opp.txt describes it in KHz).

Nishanth Menon
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux