Hi Lukasz, Viresh, On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 11:50 AM, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 14 May 2014 11:47, Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> I think that you can rely solely on the CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW flag if the >> original author of cpufreq-cpu0.c don't mind. > > We don't have to. struct cpufreq_driver: boost_supported is always available. > Just update it without any ugly #ifdefs .. Okay, so you are suggesting that Kconfig entry used to select cpufreq-cpu0 should also enable CPU_FREQ_BOOST_SW config as well. Considering that exynos4412 is the only user of this feature in mainline, should we do this? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
