On Monday, May 26, 2014 11:59:09 AM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 23 May 2014 21:44, Sören Brinkmann <soren.brinkmann@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Viresh: Could you imagine something similar for cpufreq? You suggested > > migrating to Hz resolution. I guess that would ideally mean to follow > > the CCF to a 64-bit type for frequencies and increasing the resolution. > > I have a messy patch migrating cpufreq and OPP to Hz and unsigned long > > that works on Zynq. But cpufreq has so many users that it would become > > quite an undertaking. > > And we'd need some new/amended OPP DT binding. > > If we are going to migrate to Hz from KHz, I think we must consider the > 64 bit stuff right now, otherwise it will bite us later. > > @Rafael: What do you think? I agree as far as the 64-bit thing goes, but is switching to Hz really necessary? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
