On Wed, May 14, 2014 at 6:41 PM, Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2014, 18:35:29 schrieb Viresh Kumar: >> On 14 May 2014 18:20, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Could we please come up with a way to probe this from DT in the >> > cpufreq-cpu0 driver itself, so we don't have to add a device in every >> > platform using it? >> Its followed that way because DT Maintainers had strong objections >> to creating virtual device nodes and haven't allowed creation of nodes >> for cpufreq drivers.. For which there is no physical device, as CPU already >> has a separate node.. > > as we already have the "enable-method" property for enabling/disabling cpus, > would something like a "scaling-method" be feasible? > "scaling-method" also sounds like a software specific property. Would that be something that will be acceptable in dt? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
