On Wednesday 14 May 2014 06:41:15 Thomas Abraham wrote:
> From: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Remove the platform device instantiation for Exynos specific cpufreq
> driver and add the platform device for cpufreq-cpu0 driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Thomas Abraham <thomas.ab@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c | 4 +++-
> 1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> index b32a907..489a495 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-exynos/exynos.c
> @@ -232,7 +232,9 @@ void __init exynos_cpuidle_init(void)
>
> void __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
> {
> - platform_device_register_simple("exynos-cpufreq", -1, NULL, 0);
> + if (!(of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5420")) &&
> + !(of_machine_is_compatible("samsung,exynos5440")))
> + platform_device_register_simple("cpufreq-cpu0", -1, NULL, 0);
> }
>
Could we please come up with a way to probe this from DT in the cpufreq-cpu0
driver itself, so we don't have to add a device in every platform using it?
I realize you copied it from the other platforms using this driver, but
it still seems really wrong.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
