On Friday, May 16, 2014 04:54:27 PM Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 16 May 2014 15:50, Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > This driver is using devres managed calls incorrectly, giving the cpu0 > > device as first parameter instead of the cpufreq platform device. > > This results in resources not being freed if the cpufreq platform device > > is unbound, for example if probing has to be deferred for a missing > > regulator. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach <l.stach@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq-cpu0.c | 16 +++++++++++----- > > 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > > Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@xxxxxxxxxx> Is this -stable material? If so, which -stable? -- I speak only for myself. Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
