https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77201 --- Comment #69 from Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Mauro from comment #68) > (In reply to Rafael J. Wysocki from comment #67) > > For completeness, the commit immediately preceding the one chosen by > > Srivatsa is > > > > fada94ee64e6 workqueue: add args to workqueue lockdep name > > > > so Mauro, please check if fada94ee64e6 works and then if 5bdfff96c69a fails. > > I have tested both, and both hang. I have used the latest test method of > using the userspace governor and both hang on the second frequency change > attempt. Well, the scheduler changes are left then. > I'd say my initial bisect might be very close to the source of the problem, > the reason I say this is because the machine goes into suspend just fine, > but when trying to resume it hangs (that was my initial testing procedure), > knowing what I know now I'd say a good guess is it hangs when trying to > bring the cpu online. Oh, we know that for sure. :-) That's why I asked whether or not CPU online worked via sysfs. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html