Re: Performance regression in v3.14

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> That is not true. Yes, and due to the setpoint being less than
> 100, which is needed or the driver won't work at all, there is
> a tendency to drive the target pstate upwards.
> However that is tempered by both the PID proportional gain,
> and ultimately integer math. More importantly, the CPU
> itself tells the driver when it is operating below the target
> pstate and driver responds.
> 
> Additionally, the tendency to drive up the target pstate
> too much is exasperated by some extra rounding up at a
> couple of spots. Dirk has a pending fix.
> 
> > And a few iterations
> > later, we will reach max (possible) frequency,
> > then we are effectively performance governor
> > (highest frequency all the time).
> 
> Please do not confuse highest target pstate with
> highest frequency. They are not the same. The processor
> itself can back off.
> 
Hi Doug,

All you said is about the hardware will not give whatever software wants
(e.g., requested freq too high). Agreed.

But does it matter to this discussion?

Yuyang 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux