On Wednesday 14 May 2014 18:44:46 Viresh Kumar wrote: > On 14 May 2014 18:41, Heiko Stübner <heiko@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am Mittwoch, 14. Mai 2014, 18:35:29 schrieb Viresh Kumar: > >> On 14 May 2014 18:20, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > Could we please come up with a way to probe this from DT in the > >> > cpufreq-cpu0 driver itself, so we don't have to add a device in every > >> > platform using it? > > >> Its followed that way because DT Maintainers had strong objections > >> to creating virtual device nodes and haven't allowed creation of nodes > >> for cpufreq drivers.. For which there is no physical device, as CPU already > >> has a separate node.. > > > > as we already have the "enable-method" property for enabling/disabling cpus, > > would something like a "scaling-method" be feasible? Good idea to put it as a property into the CPU node. > Lets see what DT maintainers have to say on this, I would rather go for a > more straight forward name: "scaling-driver" .. Both sound fine to me. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
