Hi Kukjin, On 26.05.2014 00:50, Kukjin Kim wrote: > On 05/23/14 23:27, Thomas Abraham wrote: >> Changes since v4: >> - Various changes in clock code suggested by Tomasz >> Figa<t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> - This series depends on mutiple other patches >> [a] patch that introduces read-only attribute for clock dividers. >> - >> http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-May/259264.html >> >> [b] the series "PM / OPP: move cpufreq specific helpers out of OPP >> layer" >> - >> https://www.mail-archive.com/linux-omap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/msg104610.html >> [c] the series "cpufreq: opp: Add device tree based lookup of boost >> mode frequency" >> - http://www.spinics.net/lists/arm-kernel/msg334336.html >> > This series looks good to me after quick loking at but as I replied on > other thread, I'm not sure above changes are ready for 3.16 or not... > > Maybe we can revisit this series for 3.17?...hmm... Also two more issues: 1) DT bindings are not acked by DT maintainers, 2) there are my comments to DT bindings from v4 not addressed. There are also several comments about the code of v4 not addressed, but this is not that important, as opposed to DT bindings which are supposed to be stable ABI. Still, I don't think this is a big deal anymore, as we can have cpufreq working with multiplatform with my hack patch and polish the implementation of this series without any hurry. Best regards, Tomasz -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
