Re: RFC on cpufreq implementation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 15 January 2015 at 22:54, Mason <mpeg.blue@xxxxxxx> wrote:
> I decided to expose only a small subset of frequencies (namely
> {999,500,333,111} MHz) because, in my tests, the ondemand gov
> chose mostly min and max, and the intermediate frequencies not
> so much; so I figured "2 intermediate freqs" is good enough.
> (I'm ready to hear otherwise.)

Following patch solved this issue in 3.17..

6393d6a1027e cpufreq: ondemand: Eliminate the deadband effect
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel Devel]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Forum]     [Linux SCSI]

  Powered by Linux