On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 09:26:56AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote: > On Fri, Nov 18, 2016 at 8:25 AM, Olof Johansson <olof@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > I also sympathize that it's extra annoying having to split just three > > patches across two branches. So, if it's easier we can just cherry-pick > > apart the patches here across the branches (your comment about next > > coverage makes me suspect you have no direct downstream users of this > > branch). If that's OK, let me know and I'll do that tomorrow. > > It's fine to cherry-pick, I can also send two separate branches (or > just 2+1 stand-alone patches). > > Any way you like it :) just tell me what to do, all I want is to get this > in for v4.10. Cherry-picking is actually faster on our side than merging, so I've done that now. Queued into next/dt and next/defconfig for 4.10. Thanks! -Olof -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
