On 16.05.2014 5:50 PM, Tomasz Figa wrote: > We have been discussing Exynos cpufreq framework rework, including DT support since quite a long time. > so if you want to know details, please look at respective discussion threads. I don't have time to > find them for you right now, but if you look for threads of cpufreq patches by Thomas Abraham and ones > about Exynos multiplatform support, then you should have quite complete set of information. > I will check that. > In general, I can see three ways to "fix" this for 3.15: > > 1) revert moving soc_is_* macros to mach-exynos/common.h, > > 2) move soc_is_* macros to a header in mach-exynos/include/mach/, > > 3) use of_machine_is_compatible() or of_match_node() on root node in this driver to match directly > with SoC compatible strings. > > Probably option 3) would be preferred, as it would remove some of the dependencies of this driver on > arch code and including plat/cpu.h (or mach/cpu.h as would be introduced by 2)) would be no longer > necessary. Thanks~ Best Regards. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe cpufreq" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
