GCC Help

• Thread Index

• Re: C++ code works on gcc 4.4 but doesn't compile on 4.5.1
  • From: Hugo Arregui <hugo.arregui@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ code works on gcc 4.4 but doesn't compile on 4.5.1
  • From: Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ code works on gcc 4.4 but doesn't compile on 4.5.1
  • From: Hugo Arregui <hugo.arregui@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ code works on gcc 4.4 but doesn't compile on 4.5.1
  • From: Sam Varshavchik <mrsam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• C++ code works on gcc 4.4 but doesn't compile on 4.5.1
  • From: Hugo Arregui <hugo.arregui@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling java without boehm-gc
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot build GCC for Cortex-M0
  • From: Andriy Sukhynyuk <asukhynyuk@xxxxxxxxx>
• problem in running glibc-2.2.5 testsuite
  • From: <chandrakumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling java without boehm-gc
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to turn off optimizer that changes direct call to indirect call
  • From: Phung Nguyen <nhphung@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC Testsuite with static libs
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Troubles --with-build-sysroot & where to stick mingw-w64?
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling java without boehm-gc
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• libstdc++ Manual in pdf?
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot build GCC for Cortex-M0
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Dirs Not Removed with 'make distclean'
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot build GCC for Cortex-M0
  • From: Andriy Sukhynyuk <asukhynyuk@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot build GCC for Cortex-M0
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Dirs Not Removed with 'make distclean'
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.5.1: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.5.1: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot build GCC for Cortex-M0
  • From: Andriy Sukhynyuk <asukhynyuk@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot build GCC for Cortex-M0
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap problem on linux-ppc (PR33130 again?)
  • From: Salvatore Filippone <salvatore.filippone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.5.1: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot build GCC for Cortex-M0
  • From: Andriy Sukhynyuk <asukhynyuk@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.5.1: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.5.1: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about 4.5.x register allocation
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.5.1: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Miguel Cardenas <renito73@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about 4.5.x register allocation
  • From: William Mahoney <wmahoney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot build GCC for Cortex-M0
  • From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@xxxxxxx>
• Re: _Decimal32 and g++, How to?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: macro expansion
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: macro expansion
  • From: Matti Linsu <matti.linsu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: macro expansion
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• macro expansion
  • From: Matti Linsu <matti.linsu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Missing asm constraint exposing compiler version differences
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cannot build GCC for Cortex-M0
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Missing asm constraint exposing compiler version differences
  • From: Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Issue when compiling assembly code in GCC 4.4.1 for ARM(inline issue)
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Issue when compiling assembly code in GCC 4.4.1 for ARM(inline issue)
  • From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Cannot build GCC for Cortex-M0
  • From: Andriy Sukhynyuk <asukhynyuk@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about gcc-4.4.4
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about gcc-4.4.4
  • From: ali hagigat <hagigatali@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about gcc-4.4.4
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Question about gcc-4.4.4
  • From: Pavel V Samsonov <samsonov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Missing asm constraint exposing compiler version differences
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dlopen() and placing exception body in .cpp file
  • From: Dimitri Tcaciuc <dtcaciuc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dlopen() and placing exception body in .cpp file
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dlopen() and placing exception body in .cpp file
  • From: Dimitri Tcaciuc <dtcaciuc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about 4.5.x register allocation
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: dlopen() and placing exception body in .cpp file
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Question about 4.5.x register allocation
  • From: William Mahoney <wmahoney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Missing asm constraint exposing compiler version differences
  • From: Philip Prindeville <philipp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• dlopen() and placing exception body in .cpp file
  • From: Dimitri Tcaciuc <dtcaciuc@xxxxxxxxx>
• __cpu_features_init error happenin when including devc libraries on netbeans othervise both compilers works fine . ? why ?
  • From: ahmet mutlu <generalchaoss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: object code created by GCC
  • From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: object code created by GCC
  • From: ali hagigat <hagigatali@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ Templates and "comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false"
  • From: Axel Freyn <axel-freyn@xxxxxx>
• help to overcome - "/usr/bin/ld: cannot find -lstdc++" error
  • From: ddmetro <puzzlesdj@xxxxxxxxx>
• C++ Templates and "comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false"
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• kernel/perf_event.c:5879:1: internal compiler error: in cgraph_estimate_size_after_inlining, at ipa-inline.c:208
  • From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: object code created by GCC
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.5.1 failing test: FAIL: abi_check
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile-listing
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Compile-listing
  • From: "Franz Edler" <franz.edler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: object code created by GCC
  • From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: object code created by GCC
  • From: ahmet mutlu <generalchaoss@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.5.1 failing test: FAIL: abi_check
  • From: Serge Belyshev <belyshev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• object code created by GCC
  • From: ali hagigat <hagigatali@xxxxxxxxx>
• Missing asm constraint exposing compiler version differences
  • From: Philip Prindeville <philipp_subx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.5.1 failing test: FAIL: abi_check
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: please add me to the mailing list
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• please add me to the mailing list
  • From: ali hagigat <hagigatali@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Darwin build error
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Darwin build error
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Dirs Not Removed with 'make distclean'
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Darwin build error
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Darwin build error
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [GCC front end] trying to install python fe but fail in make
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Dirs Not Removed with 'make distclean'
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems building gcc 4.5.1 on AIX 6.1
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Bug in Build System of gcc-4.5.1? Cannot Find libmpc.so.2
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• [GCC front end] trying to install python fe but fail in make
  • From: charfi asma <charfiasma@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap problem on linux-ppc (PR33130 again?)
  • From: Salvatore Filippone <salvatore.filippone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems building gcc 4.5.1 on AIX 6.1
  • From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Bootstrap problem on linux-ppc (PR33130 again?)
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimization Switches
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems building gcc 4.5.1 on AIX 6.1
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems building gcc 4.5.1 on AIX 6.1
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problems building gcc 4.5.1 on AIX 6.1
  • From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re : Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: charfi asma <charfiasma@xxxxxxxx>
• Bootstrap problem on linux-ppc (PR33130 again?)
  • From: Salvatore Filippone <salvatore.filippone@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange warning about passing argument with different width due to prototype with gcc 4.4.0 on 64 bits machine
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ dump translation unit question
  • From: "Andi Hellmund" <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange warning about passing argument with different width due to prototype with gcc 4.4.0 on 64 bits machine
  • From: José Luis García Pallero <jgpallero@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disable warnings about variadic templates
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Disable warnings about variadic templates
  • From: Roland Bock <rbock@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GPL V-3 Info regarding Cross toolchain
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GPL V-3 Info regarding Cross toolchain
  • From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trampoline management in compound statements
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Iterators: distance versus operator- argument types.
  • From: rgamarra <rgamarra@xxxxxxxxx>
• trampoline management in compound statements
  • From: "Neal H. Walfield" <neal@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: undefined reference to
  • From: Axel Freyn <axel-freyn@xxxxxx>
• undefined reference to
  • From: jmchu@xxxxxxx
• Re: Iterators: distance versus operator- argument types.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Iterators: distance versus operator- argument types.
  • From: rgamarra <rgamarra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange warning about passing argument with different width due to prototype with gcc 4.4.0 on 64 bits machine
  • From: José Luis García Pallero <jgpallero@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: where's the key used to check gcc-4.5.1.tar.bz2.sig
  • From: Larry Evans <cppljevans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• g++ dump translation unit question
  • From: Piotr Markiewicz <piomark@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: where's the key used to check gcc-4.5.1.tar.bz2.sig
  • From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: where's the key used to check gcc-4.5.1.tar.bz2.sig
  • From: Larry Evans <cppljevans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: where's the key used to check gcc-4.5.1.tar.bz2.sig
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• where's the key used to check gcc-4.5.1.tar.bz2.sig
  • From: Larry Evans <cppljevans@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange warning about passing argument with different width due to prototype with gcc 4.4.0 on 64 bits machine
  • From: Tiago Maluta <tiago.maluta@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Iterators: distance versus operator- argument types.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange warning about passing argument with different width due to prototype with gcc 4.4.0 on 64 bits machine
  • From: José Luis García Pallero <jgpallero@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange warning about passing argument with different width due to prototype with gcc 4.4.0 on 64 bits machine
  • From: Tiago Maluta <tiago.maluta@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange warning about passing argument with different width due to prototype with gcc 4.4.0 on 64 bits machine
  • From: José Luis García Pallero <jgpallero@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange warning about passing argument with different width due to prototype with gcc 4.4.0 on 64 bits machine
  • From: Axel Freyn <axel-freyn@xxxxxx>
• Re: Strange warning about passing argument with different width due to prototype with gcc 4.4.0 on 64 bits machine
  • From: Tiago Maluta <tiago.maluta@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange warning about passing argument with different width due to prototype with gcc 4.4.0 on 64 bits machine
  • From: José Luis García Pallero <jgpallero@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strange warning about passing argument with different width due to prototype with gcc 4.4.0 on 64 bits machine
  • From: Tiago Maluta <tiago.maluta@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: charfi asma <charfiasma@xxxxxxxx>
• Strange warning about passing argument with different width due to prototype with gcc 4.4.0 on 64 bits machine
  • From: José Luis García Pallero <jgpallero@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cross compiling gcc
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: optimizing 128bit integer arithmetic on ia32
  • From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• Iterators: distance versus operator- argument types.
  • From: rgamarra <rgamarra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing 128bit integer arithmetic on ia32
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: Andi Hellmund <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• symbol redefined errors
  • From: <Kartik.Vashishta@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• optimizing 128bit integer arithmetic on ia32
  • From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: Link error
  • From: Phung Nguyen <nhphung@xxxxxxxxx>
• Dumping GIMPLE ELF sections to text (2)
  • From: nkavv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Dumping GIMPLE ELF sections to text
  • From: nkavv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: charfi asma <charfiasma@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC cross compiler dependency
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC cross compiler dependency
  • From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC cross compiler dependency
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC cross compiler dependency
  • From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: charfi asma <charfiasma@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Job Noorman <jobnoorman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Job Noorman <jobnoorman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Job Noorman <jobnoorman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Simple substitution for * ((unsigned short *)ptr)++ = XXXX ?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mysterious relocation
  • From: NetStranger <shtras@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Job Noorman <jobnoorman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Simple substitution for * ((unsigned short *)ptr)++ = XXXX ?
  • From: Pan ruochen <panruochen@xxxxxxxxx>
• help with iterating through the declarations in a function
  • From: Jeff Saremi <jeffsaremi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: adding another tls dialect
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• adding another tls dialect
  • From: trashmailer <my.1337.trash.mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: MPC8360e stmw/lmw
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Job Noorman <jobnoorman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: test for excess errors
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: charfi asma <charfiasma@xxxxxxxx>
• MPC8360e stmw/lmw
  • From: Anthony Amaro Jr <anthonyamaro@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mysterious relocation
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC testsuite issue
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mysterious relocation
  • From: NetStranger <shtras@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: test for excess errors
  • From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cross compiling gcc
  • From: "Segher Boessenkool" <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: test for excess errors
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: test for excess errors
  • From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Job Noorman <jobnoorman@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Differences between -O2 and -O3
  • From: bernd Kopf <bayerntoni@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Mysterious relocation
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Fwd: Help with undefined reference]
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: test for excess errors
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC testsuite issue
  • From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: not using -fno-exceptions flag
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: causing function not to clobber
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: cross compiling gcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to detect that memory over 4G isn't available ?
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Mysterious relocation
  • From: NetStranger <shtras@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to detect that memory over 4G isn't available ?
  • From: Harald Servat <harald.servat@xxxxxx>
• Re: Differences between -O2 and -O3
  • From: "Liu, Lei" <lei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to detect that memory over 4G isn't available ?
  • From: Paul Chavent <paul.chavent@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Differences between -O2 and -O3
  • From: Tiago Maluta <tiago.maluta@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Differences between -O2 and -O3
  • From: Tiago Maluta <tiago.maluta@xxxxxxxxx>
• Differences between -O2 and -O3
  • From: bernd Kopf <bayerntoni@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with regex
  • From: Tiago Maluta <tiago.maluta@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with regex
  • From: Alexander Seifert <alexander.seifert@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Fwd: Help with undefined reference]
  • From: Lothar Werzinger <lothar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to detect that memory over 4G isn't available ?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to detect that memory over 4G isn't available ?
  • From: Paul Chavent <paul.chavent@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Fwd: Help with undefined reference]
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [Fwd: Help with undefined reference]
  • From: Lothar Werzinger <lothar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [Fwd: Help with undefined reference]
  • From: Machiel Richards <machielr@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compiling gcc45x on solaris x86
  • From: Pierre Léonard <pierre.leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: charfi asma <charfiasma@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ Long compile times
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• test for excess errors
  • From: paladin tripathi <paladin.tripathi@xxxxxxxxx>
• not using -fno-exceptions flag
  • From: Artur Szostak <artursz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: testing for arithmetic carry
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Compile error when not using -ftree-ter
  • From: Job Noorman <jobnoorman@xxxxxxxxx>
• causing function not to clobber
  • From: Dima Sorkin <dmitri.sorkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• testing for arithmetic carry
  • From: Dima Sorkin <dmitri.sorkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• cross compiling gcc
  • From: "Max S." <king@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• g++ Long compile times
  • From: Brad Bell <bradbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why No Names for gcc's Objective C and Objective C++?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why No Names for gcc's Objective C and Objective C++?
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why No Names for gcc's Objective C and Objective C++?
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building nss-3.12.7 with 4.6.0 20100731
  • From: "Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why No Names for gcc's Objective C and Objective C++?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Build and Check Problems with gcc 4.5.1: Bugs to Be Reported?
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why No Names for gcc's Objective C and Objective C++?
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compiling gcc45x on solaris x86
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC-test suite help needed
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: const + optimizations [WAS: Need C optimization help]
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: const + optimizations [WAS: Need C optimization help]
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: const + optimizations [WAS: Need C optimization help]
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compiling gcc45x on solaris x86
  • From: Pierre Léonard <pierre.leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why No Names for gcc's Objective C and Objective C++?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compiling gcc45x on solaris x86
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Build and Check Problems with gcc 4.5.1: Bugs to Be Reported?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: my switch statement disappears after the return from plugin
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Debugging plugins with gdb
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: defining big types on avr-gcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a direct function call from inline assembly
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a direct function call from inline assembly
  • From: Job Noorman <jobnoorman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a direct function call from inline assembly
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a direct function call from inline assembly
  • From: Job Noorman <jobnoorman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a direct function call from inline assembly
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need C optimization help
  • From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@xxxxxxxx>
• const + optimizations [WAS: Need C optimization help]
  • From: Enrico Weigelt <weigelt@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a direct function call from inline assembly
  • From: Job Noorman <jobnoorman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a direct function call from inline assembly
  • From: Job Noorman <jobnoorman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a direct function call from inline assembly
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Making a direct function call from inline assembly
  • From: Job Noorman <jobnoorman@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC-test suite help needed
  • From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compiling gcc45x on solaris x86
  • From: Pierre Léonard <pierre.leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compiling gcc45x on solaris x86
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: condition precedences in 'if'
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Why No Names for gcc's Objective C and Objective C++?
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• compiling gcc45x on solaris x86
  • From: Pierre Léonard <pierre.leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• conditions precedence in 'if'
  • From: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Link error
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: condition precedences in 'if'
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• condition precedences in 'if'
  • From: mahmoodn <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: march option for atom on gcc 4.1
  • From: bokkuri matsu <matsubokkuri33@xxxxxxxxx>
• Build and Check Problems with gcc 4.5.1: Bugs to Be Reported?
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: History of C++ features in gcc
  • From: Edward Diener <eldlistmailingz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: History of C++ features in gcc
  • From: "Segher Boessenkool" <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• History of C++ features in gcc
  • From: Edward Diener <eldlistmailingz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: address of overloaded function with no contextual type information
  • From: Adam Burr <adamb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: address of overloaded function with no contextual type information
  • From: Tiago Maluta <tiago.maluta@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: address of overloaded function with no contextual type information
  • From: Adam Burr <adamb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: address of overloaded function with no contextual type information
  • From: Tiago Maluta <tiago.maluta@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC generated .MIPS.stubs section - what is it for?
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: march option for atom on gcc 4.1
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Checking for -Werror and -Weffc++ usage
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• address of overloaded function with no contextual type information
  • From: Adam Burr <adamb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC generated .MIPS.stubs section - what is it for?
  • From: Sagrailo <sagrailo@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems using a compiled jar with gcj
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems using a compiled jar with gcj
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Test Results with gcc-4.5.1: Cause for Concern?
  • From: Pierre Léonard <pierre.leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems using a compiled jar with gcj
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems using a compiled jar with gcj
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems using a compiled jar with gcj
  • From: Lothar Werzinger <lothar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems using a compiled jar with gcj
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems using a compiled jar with gcj
  • From: Lothar Werzinger <lothar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems using a compiled jar with gcj
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems using a compiled jar with gcj
  • From: Lothar Werzinger <lothar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems using a compiled jar with gcj
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems using a compiled jar with gcj
  • From: Lothar Werzinger <lothar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Test Results with gcc-4.5.1: Cause for Concern?
  • From: Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.5.0 - libgfortran issue
  • From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problems using a compiled jar with gcj
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.5.0 - libgfortran issue
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.5.0 - libgfortran issue
  • From: Philipp Edelmann <edelmann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• my switch statement disappears after the return from plugin
  • From: Jeff Saremi <jeffsaremi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problems using a compiled jar with gcj
  • From: Lothar Werzinger <lothar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ++-bug on enums with -O2 in version 4.4
  • From: gcc@xxxxxxxx
• why would this casue seg fault? gimple_block_label (EXIT_BLOCK_PTR)
  • From: Jeff Saremi <jeffsaremi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Debugging plugins with gdb
  • From: Jeff Saremi <jeffsaremi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ++-bug on enums with -O2 in version 4.4
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• ++-bug on enums with -O2 in version 4.4
  • From: gcc@xxxxxxxx
• march option for atom on gcc 4.1
  • From: bokkuri matsu <matsubokkuri33@xxxxxxxxx>
• Checking for -Werror and -Weffc++ usage
  • From: Artur Szostak <artursz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Stack backtrace for ARM/Thumb
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• facinf problem in arm-cc to arm-gcc gas conversion
  • From: suvir.bhargav@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• RE: Stack backtrace for ARM/Thumb
  • From: "Stern, Eli" <eli.stern@xxxxxx>
• Re: error in loading rpm compiled with gcc 4.5
  • From: Preeti Sharma <pritis@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: defining big types on avr-gcc
  • From: Massimiliano Cialdi <massimiliano.cialdi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: defining big types on avr-gcc
  • From: Robert Dell <dellr@xxxxxxx>
• Re: defining big types on avr-gcc
  • From: Massimiliano Cialdi <massimiliano.cialdi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Benchmark of lto and graphit improvements of gcc-4.5
  • From: "Martin Ettl" <ettl.martin@xxxxxx>
• Re: defining big types on avr-gcc
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs is actually doing?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: defining big types on avr-gcc
  • From: Massimiliano Cialdi <massimiliano.cialdi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: defining big types on avr-gcc
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: defining big types on avr-gcc
  • From: Massimiliano Cialdi <massimiliano.cialdi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: need help producing statically linked executable
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: need help producing statically linked executable
  • From: Charlie Zender <zender@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gcov error message
  • From: Andi Hellmund <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: need help producing statically linked executable
  • From: Andi Hellmund <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: need help producing statically linked executable
  • From: Charlie Zender <zender@xxxxxxx>
• What --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs is actually doing?
  • From: dominiq@xxxxxxxxxx (Dominique Dhumieres)
• gcov error message
  • From: "Canham, Timothy K (316C)" <timothy.k.canham@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: need help producing statically linked executable
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• need help producing statically linked executable
  • From: Charlie Zender <zender@xxxxxxx>
• Re: defining big types on avr-gcc
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: defining big types on avr-gcc
  • From: Massimiliano Cialdi <massimiliano.cialdi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: defining big types on avr-gcc
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• defining big types on avr-gcc
  • From: Massimiliano Cialdi <massimiliano.cialdi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.5.0 x86_64 host targeting armv5tel library issue
  • From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.5.0 x86_64 host targeting armv5tel library issue
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.5.0 x86_64 host targeting armv5tel library issue
  • From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: strict aliasing can not be turned off
  • From: "Liu, Lei" <lei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.5.0 x86_64 host targeting armv5tel library issue
  • From: Andy Green <andy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: strict aliasing can not be turned off
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• strict aliasing can not be turned off
  • From: "Liu, Lei" <lei.liu2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to get attual method in GCC AST
  • From: Kien Nguyen Trung <kiennt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: hello gcc 4.2.1 C preprocessor question, any clues are welcome;
  • From: mm w <0xcafefeed@xxxxxxxxx>
• hello gcc 4.2.1 C preprocessor question, any clues are welcome;
  • From: mm w <0xcafefeed@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Fortran to C
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• Re: Fortran to C
  • From: Toon Moene <toon@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Determining the size of allocated memory from a pointer
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Fortran to C
  • From: "Vardhan, Sundara (GE Energy)" <sundara.vardhan@xxxxxx>
• Determining the size of allocated memory from a pointer
  • From: Justin_10 <justi_10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with Automatic parallelization in GCC4.5
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with Automatic parallelization in GCC4.5
  • From: "zhouxu(NUDT)" <zhouxuzhu1985@xxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: error in loading rpm compiled with gcc 4.5
  • From: Preeti Sharma <pritis@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can I prevent gcc building code for later processors?
  • From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Can I prevent gcc building code for later processors?
  • From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: __gnu_inline__ and __artificial__
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How does one compile 64-bit executables on HP-UX PA-RISC?
  • From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How does one compile 64-bit executables on HP-UX PA-RISC?
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How does one compile 64-bit executables on HP-UX PA-RISC?
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How does one compile 64-bit executables on HP-UX PA-RISC?
  • From: Steve Ellcey <sje@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How does one compile 64-bit executables on HP-UX PA-RISC?
  • From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How does one compile 64-bit executables on HP-UX PA-RISC?
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How does one compile 64-bit executables on HP-UX PA-RISC?
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How does one compile 64-bit executables on HP-UX PA-RISC?
  • From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How does one compile 64-bit executables on HP-UX PA-RISC?
  • From: Jeff Law <law@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How can I determine if _Complex_I is defined in complex.h?
  • From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How does one compile 64-bit executables on HP-UX PA-RISC?
  • From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: __gnu_inline__ and __artificial__
  • From: Marek Polacek <mmpolacek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Has anyone imported/edited gcc source into eclipse?
  • From: Jay Vaughan <jay.vaughan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Has anyone imported/edited gcc source into eclipse?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• __gnu_inline__ and __artificial__
  • From: Nikolai Lazarov <nik7012@xxxxxxxxx>
• Has anyone imported/edited gcc source into eclipse?
  • From: Jeff Saremi <jeffsaremi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regardig asm volatile query
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regardig asm volatile query
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: Regardig asm volatile query
  • From: paladin tripathi <paladin.tripathi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About DWARF DW_AT_external
  • From: P J P <pj.pandit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About DWARF DW_AT_external
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About DWARF DW_AT_external
  • From: P J P <pj.pandit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with Automatic parallelization in GCC4.5
  • From: Toon Moene <toon@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: question on mips embedded asm instructions
  • From: "Amker.Cheng" <amker.cheng@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About DWARF DW_AT_external
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: question on mips embedded asm instructions
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with Automatic parallelization in GCC4.5
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• About DWARF DW_AT_external
  • From: P J P <pj.pandit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• question on mips embedded asm instructions
  • From: "Amker.Cheng" <amker.cheng@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with Automatic parallelization in GCC4.5
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strict aliasing plus placement new / explicit destructor call
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strict aliasing plus placement new / explicit destructor call
  • From: Justin Lebar <justin.lebar@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Could my understanding of 'crti.o' in a ARM cross compile be verified?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Could my understanding of 'crti.o' in a ARM cross compile be verified?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Could my understanding of 'crti.o' in a ARM cross compile be verified?
  • From: Jamie Risk <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Could my understanding of 'crti.o' in a ARM cross compile be verified?
  • From: Jamie Risk <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Could my understanding of 'crti.o' in a ARM cross compile be verified?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Could my understanding of 'crti.o' in a ARM cross compile be verified?
  • From: Jamie Risk <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Could my understanding of 'crti.o' in a ARM cross compile be verified?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Could my understanding of 'crti.o' in a ARM cross compile be verified?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Could my understanding of 'crti.o' in a ARM cross compile be verified?
  • From: Jamie Risk <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Statically compiling gcc
  • From: "Andy Gibbs" <andyg1001@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with Automatic parallelization in GCC4.5
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with Automatic parallelization in GCC4.5
  • From: "zhouxu(NUDT)" <zhouxuzhu1985@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Statically compiling gcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Statically compiling gcc
  • From: "Andy Gibbs" <andyg1001@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there any compile option equel "__attribute__" ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there any compile option equel "__attribute__" ?
  • From: Marek Polacek <mmpolacek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there any compile option equel "__attribute__" ?
  • From: star young <zhongzifaya@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there any compile option equel "__attribute__" ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there any compile option equel "__attribute__" ?
  • From: star young <zhongzifaya@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is there any compile option equel "__attribute__" ?
  • From: Marek Polacek <mmpolacek@xxxxxxxxx>
• Is there any compile option equel "__attribute__" ?
  • From: star young <zhongzifaya@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strict aliasing plus placement new / explicit destructor call
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strict aliasing plus placement new / explicit destructor call
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with Automatic parallelization in GCC4.5
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Could my understanding of 'crti.o' in a ARM cross compile be verified?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strict aliasing plus placement new / explicit destructor call
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• problem with Automatic parallelization in GCC4.5
  • From: "zhouxu(NUDT)" <zhouxuzhu1985@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: new arch: problems with arguments passing, args not put on stack
  • From: Gabor Kerenyi <kerenyi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Could my understanding of 'crti.o' in a ARM cross compile be verified?
  • From: Jamie Risk <jamie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Strict aliasing plus placement new / explicit destructor call
  • From: Justin Lebar <justin.lebar@xxxxxxxxx>
• new arch: problems with arguments passing, args not put on stack
  • From: Gabor Kerenyi <kerenyi@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Runtime error message: "format too complex"
  • From: kamaraju kusumanchi <raju.mailinglists@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with creating a simple switch stmt in Gimple
  • From: Jeff Saremi <jeffsaremi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Query regarding gcc debugging
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Help with creating a plugin that modifies a program
  • From: Wissen <aka-wissen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Query regarding gcc debugging
  • From: paladin tripathi <paladin.tripathi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with creating a simple switch stmt in Gimple
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Help with creating a simple switch stmt in Gimple
  • From: Jeff Saremi <jeffsaremi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a relocatable non-pic executable
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a relocatable non-pic executable
  • From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a relocatable non-pic executable
  • From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• a relocatable non-pic executable
  • From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Stack backtrace for ARM/Thumb
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with an openMP and pthread program compiled with gcc
  • From: MSteve <steve.macao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Stack backtrace for ARM/Thumb
  • From: "Stern, Eli" <eli.stern@xxxxxx>
• Re: Make error, link test in zlib for cross compiler
  • From: Donald Schlicht <dschlic1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error in loading rpm compiled with gcc 4.5
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: %ebx vs %ecx
  • From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• %ebx vs %ecx
  • From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• error in loading rpm compiled with gcc 4.5
  • From: Preeti Sharma <pritis@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where are bsi_ functions as mentioned in gcc internals-cfg section?
  • From: Jeff Saremi <jeffsaremi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Where are bsi_ functions as mentioned in gcc internals-cfg section?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc4.4.4] bootstrap
  • From: Pierre Léonard <pierre.leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Where are bsi_ functions as mentioned in gcc internals-cfg section?
  • From: Jeff Saremi <jeffsaremi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problems building gcc cross compiler
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• problems building gcc cross compiler
  • From: Wade Smith <warm38@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Make error, link test in zlib for cross compiler
  • From: Georg Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Info Need for `apcs-gnu', `atpcs', `aapcs', `aapcs-linux' and `iwmmxt'.
  • From: naveen yadav <yad.naveen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with an openMP and pthread program compiled with gcc
  • From: MSteve <steve.macao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Make error, link test in zlib for cross compiler
  • From: Donald Schlicht <dschlic1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strict aliasing problem in gcc 4.4.4
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strict aliasing problem in gcc 4.4.4
  • From: "Andy Gibbs" <andyg1001@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc and libbackend.a
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Strict aliasing problem in gcc 4.4.4
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Strict aliasing problem in gcc 4.4.4
  • From: "Andy Gibbs" <andyg1001@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc and libbackend.a
  • From: "Segher Boessenkool" <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc and libbackend.a
  • From: ranjith kumar <ranjithproxy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Change in pre-processor behavior with gcc-4.5.0
  • From: Axel Freyn <axel-freyn@xxxxxx>
• Re: How safe is gcc -O3 ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Change in pre-processor behavior with gcc-4.5.0
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How safe is gcc -O3 ?
  • From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How safe is gcc -O3 ?
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• How safe is gcc -O3 ?
  • From: "Dr. David Kirkby" <david.kirkby@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Change in pre-processor behavior with gcc-4.5.0
  • From: Chris Packham <judge.packham@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Runtime error message: "format too complex"
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Runtime error message: "format too complex"
  • From: "Bushhouse, Sally (MDH)" <Sally.Bushhouse@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc command line exceeds 8191 when building in XP
  • From: Cedric Roux <cedric.roux@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc command line exceeds 8191 when building in XP
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: some questions about kernel debugging
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: some questions about kernel debugging
  • From: loody <miloody@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: charfi asma <charfiasma@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc4.4.4] bootstrap
  • From: Pierre Léonard <pierre.leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Canadian Cross toolchain for ucLinux feasible?
  • From: Name lastlong <brew_pt@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: processing dwarf loc
  • From: Michael Eager <eager@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Targeting Green Arrays Processors
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ into JVM
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• C++ into JVM
  • From: "Julio M. Otuyama" <otuyama@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: output difference between VC and gcc
  • From: Peter <one2001boy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling java without boehm-gc
  • From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <dmitrij.ledkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• getting GCC to hoist my vtable lookup (in C)?
  • From: Josh Haberman <jhaberman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Targeting Green Arrays Processors
  • From: Stephen Hatton <pikpik.1010@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: output difference between VC and gcc
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling java without boehm-gc
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: output difference between VC and gcc
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• libgcc_s issue when installing GCC 4.5.0 on Mac OS X 10.5.8
  • From: "Colin V. Parker" <cvparker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: output difference between VC and gcc
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: quality of code produced for arm cortex-A8
  • From: Richard Earnshaw <Richard.Earnshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: quality of code produced for arm cortex-A8
  • From: Ajmal Ahammed <ajmalahd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: output difference between VC and gcc
  • From: Mihai Donțu <mihai.dontu@xxxxxxxxx>
• output difference between VC and gcc
  • From: Peter <one2001boy@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling java without boehm-gc
  • From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <dmitrij.ledkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling java without boehm-gc
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling java without boehm-gc
  • From: Dmitrijs Ledkovs <dmitrij.ledkov@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: processing dwarf loc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [gcc4.4.4] bootstrap
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: quality of code produced for arm cortex-A8
  • From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@xxxxxxx>
• Re: dwarf, step over
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• processing dwarf loc
  • From: John Smith <ds0163@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : Re : [GCC front end] trying to install sample_fe but fail in make
  • From: charfi asma <charfiasma@xxxxxxxx>
• dwarf, step over
  • From: John Smith <ds0163@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc -fplugin-arg
  • From: Cheng Renquan <crquan@xxxxxxxxx>
• [gcc4.4.4] bootstrap
  • From: Pierre Léonard <pierre.leonard@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with an openMP and pthread program compiled with gcc
  • From: MSteve <steve.macao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: getting older gcc binaries
  • From: Vikram A <vikram.account@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: getting older gcc binaries
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What does PHI node mean? [GCC Internals Manual]
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• getting older gcc binaries
  • From: Vikram A <vikram.account@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What does PHI node mean? [GCC Internals Manual]
  • From: "Dennis, CHENG Renquan" <crquan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with an openMP and pthread program compiled with gcc
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: C++ compiler not installed on this system - error
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Section placement into C constants
  • From: Thomas Martitz <thomas.martitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• C++ compiler not installed on this system - error
  • From: ddmetro <puzzlesdj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with an openMP and pthread program compiled with gcc
  • From: MSteve <steve.macao@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• How to generate MMX code with GCC?
  • From: Erven Rohou <erven.rohou@xxxxxxxx>
• gcc -fplugin-arg
  • From: Pietro Incardona <asmprog32@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What does PHI node mean? [GCC Internals Manual]
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Section placement into C constants
  • From: "Luke Trowbridge" <ltrowbridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What does PHI node mean? [GCC Internals Manual]
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: What does PHI node mean? [GCC Internals Manual]
  • From: Cheng Renquan <crquan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Position-independent linker script symbols
  • From: "Luke Trowbridge" <ltrowbridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What does PHI node mean? [GCC Internals Manual]
  • From: Georg Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: What does PHI node mean? [GCC Internals Manual]
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What does PHI node mean? [GCC Internals Manual]
  • From: Cheng Renquan <crquan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Position-independent linker script symbols
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: some questions about kernel debugging
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What does PHI node mean? [GCC Internals Manual]
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• What does PHI node mean? [GCC Internals Manual]
  • From: Cheng Renquan <crquan@xxxxxxxxx>
• What does PHI node mean? [GCC Internals Manual]
  • From: crquan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Dennis)
• Position-independent linker script symbols
  • From: "Luke Trowbridge" <ltrowbridge@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling gcc-4.5.0 : error with ppl
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling gcc-4.5.0 : error with ppl
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: How to compile binaries for PIC32?
  • From: Sébastien GRENIER <sebastien.grenier7@xxxxxxx>
• RE: How to compile binaries for PIC32?
  • From: Sébastien GRENIER <sebastien.grenier7@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling gcc-4.5.0 : error with ppl
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ARM GCC: MOVT/MOVW reloacations error
  • From: Jie Zhang <jie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to ensure loop unrolling with template programming
  • From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: designated inits
  • From: Andi Hellmund <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling gcc-4.5.0 : error with ppl
  • From: Preeti Sharma <pritis@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: ARM GCC: MOVT/MOVW reloacations error
  • From: Pavel Pavlov <pavel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to ensure loop unrolling with template programming
  • From: Axel Freyn <axel-freyn@xxxxxx>
• designated inits
  • From: todd freed <todd.freed@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Weird error on templates‏
  • From: "John S. Fine" <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Weird error on templates‏
  • From: "Panos C. C." <godlike_panos_hot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: "Panos C. C." <godlike_panos_hot@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to ensure loop unrolling with template programming
  • From: Frank Winter <frank.winter@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Avoid certain registers in inline assembly
  • From: "Andy Gibbs" <andyg1001@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Avoid certain registers in inline assembly
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Avoid certain registers in inline assembly
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Implementing intrinsics in GCC
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: internal compiler error
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Avoid certain registers in inline assembly
  • From: "Andy Gibbs" <andyg1001@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling gcc-4.5.0 : error with ppl
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fwd: some questions about kernel debugging
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Implementing intrinsics in GCC
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What's the meaning of #APP and #NOAPP
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to ensure loop unrolling with template programming
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Questions on script linker file
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• internal compiler error
  • From: <Malte.Mauelshagen@xxxxxx>
• Re: How to compile binaries for PIC32?
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling gcc-4.5.0 : error with ppl
  • From: Preeti Sharma <pritis@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to compile binaries for PIC32?
  • From: Michelle Konzack <linux4michelle@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LTO and C99 inline functions broken (was: Type-generic macros with C)
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• LTO and C99 inline functions broken (was: Type-generic macros with C)
  • From: Jörg Leis <joerg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: some questions about kernel debugging
  • From: loody <miloody@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to ensure loop unrolling with template programming
  • From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Implementing intrinsics in GCC
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Implementing intrinsics in GCC
  • From: Joe Vee <jvarghe9999@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to ensure loop unrolling with template programming
  • From: Brian Budge <brian.budge@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: What's the meaning of #APP and #NOAPP
  • From: Pietro Incardona <asmprog32@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Turning on optimizations borg my programs
  • From: "M.C.A. (Marco) Devillers" <marco.devillers@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Turning on optimizations borg my programs
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Turning on optimizations borg my programs
  • From: Cedric Roux <cedric.roux@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Turning on optimizations borg my programs
  • From: "M.C.A. (Marco) Devillers" <marco.devillers@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: surprising optimization of comparison operations for __int128_t
  • From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• What's the meaning of #APP and #NOAPP
  • From: Parmenides <mobile.parmenides@xxxxxxxxx>
• quality of code produced for arm cortex-A8
  • From: Ajmal Ahammed <ajmalahd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Plugins PLUGIN_PRE_GENERICIZE (retry)
  • From: Pietro Incardona <asmprog32@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: surprising optimization of comparison operations for __int128_t
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: surprising optimization of comparison operations for __int128_t
  • From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: surprising optimization of comparison operations for __int128_t
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• how to ensure loop unrolling with template programming
  • From: Frank Winter <frank.winter@xxxxxxx>
• surprising optimization of comparison operations for __int128_t
  • From: Mathieu Lacage <mathieu.lacage@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem rolling GMP and MPFR into a GCC build
  • From: Justin Seyster <jrseys@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Redirecting Cout to UART
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help with __sync for "long long" types
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Redirecting Cout to UART
  • From: Jose Antonio Garcia Peiro <jgpeiro@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Align attribute on struct
  • From: "Rodrigo Dominguez" <roddomi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Align attribute on struct
  • From: "ivanko.rus" <ivanko.rus@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help with __sync for "long long" types
  • From: Preeti Sharma <pritis@xxxxxxxxx>
• Align attribute on struct
  • From: "Rodrigo Dominguez" <roddomi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help with __sync for "long long" types
  • From: Preeti Sharma <pritis@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help with __sync for "long long" types
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help with __sync for "long long" types
  • From: Preeti Sharma <pritis@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help with __sync for "long long" types
  • From: Preeti Sharma <pritis@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: help with __sync for "long long" types
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• help with __sync for "long long" types
  • From: Preeti Sharma <pritis@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.4.1 issue
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Plugins PLUGIN_PRE_GENERICIZE
  • From: Pietro Incardona <asmprog32@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.4.1 issue
  • From: keshav yadav <keshav.yadav2005@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.4.1 issue
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.4.0 big binary full of NULLs
  • From: Pavel Pavlov <pavel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.4.1 issue
  • From: keshav yadav <keshav.yadav2005@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem rolling GMP and MPFR into a GCC build
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Problem rolling GMP and MPFR into a GCC build
  • From: Justin Seyster <jrseys@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: returning const references to temporaries/local variables
  • From: Axel Freyn <axel-freyn@xxxxxx>
• RE: ARM GCC: MOVT/MOVW reloacations error
  • From: Pavel Pavlov <pavel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error while cross compiling gcc-4.4.0
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• returning const references to temporaries/local variables
  • From: Joachim Reichel <joachim.reichel@xxxxxx>
• Error while cross compiling gcc-4.4.0
  • From: Nil Mac <nij810@xxxxxxxxx>
• Questions on script linker file
  • From: Valter Rasicci - VMEDIA <vmedia@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: Question on linker script file
  • From: Valter Rasicci - VMEDIA <vmedia@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: ARM GCC: MOVT/MOVW reloacations error
  • From: Jie Zhang <jie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• ARM GCC: MOVT/MOVW reloacations error
  • From: Pavel Pavlov <pavel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to find libs version (Newlib and UCLIBC) ?
  • From: Name lastlong <brew_pt@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GMP+MPFR+MPC on MAC
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Errors while installing gcc-4.5.0 on lucid lynx
  • From: sirish m <x01123581321@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: DECL_SAVED_TREE is always null on the first FUNCTION_DECL and is not null on the others‏
  • From: Pietro Incardona <asmprog32@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to find libs version (Newlib and UCLIBC) ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to find libs version (Newlib and UCLIBC) ?
  • From: Name lastlong <brew_pt@xxxxxxxxx>
• DECL_SAVED_TREE is always null on the first FUNCTION_DECL and is not null on the others‏
  • From: Pietro Incardona <asmprog32@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran and gcc versions
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GMP+MPFR+MPC on MAC
  • From: "Evans, Thomas M." <evanstm@xxxxxxxx>
• gfortran and gcc versions
  • From: Andrew Sasak <andrew.sasak@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error: size of array test is negative
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: make not using correct LDFLAGS
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Thanks for advice
  • From: Da Feng <jvfengda@xxxxxxxxx>
• error: size of array test is negative
  • From: Aaditya kumar <passion.for.systems@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC supporting Playstation Move
  • From: Jay Vaughan <jay.vaughan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Code coverage for _constructor()/_destructor()'s?
  • From: Jay Vaughan <jay.vaughan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• make not using correct LDFLAGS
  • From: Aaditya kumar <passion.for.systems@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC supporting Playstation Move
  • From: admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• RE: SIGSEGV in _Unwind_Backtrace when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer
  • From: Lukasz Lempart <Lukasz.Lempart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc 4.4.4 GPL question
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: SIGSEGV in _Unwind_Backtrace when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer
  • From: David Daney <ddaney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• SIGSEGV in _Unwind_Backtrace when compiling with -fomit-frame-pointer
  • From: Lukasz Lempart <Lukasz.Lempart@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc 4.4.4 GPL question
  • From: xiaoyi wang <xyaswang@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: class partial specialization error (might be g++'s)
  • From: Rodolfo Schulz de Lima <rodolfo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: class partial specialization error (might be g++'s)
  • From: Rodolfo Schulz de Lima <rodolfo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: class partial specialization error (might be g++'s)
  • From: Tiago Maluta <tiago.maluta@xxxxxxxxx>
• class partial specialization error (might be g++'s)
  • From: Rodolfo Lima <rodolfo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to find libs version (Newlib and UCLIBC) ?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to debug SIGSEGV generated at @plt section
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc 4.4.4 GPL question
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem detected when compiling gmp/mpfr ahead of gcc-4.3.5
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Code coverage for _constructor()/_destructor()'s?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to find libs version (Newlib and UCLIBC) ?
  • From: Name lastlong <brew_pt@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regression Failures after defining TARGET_VECTOR_MODE_SUPPORTED_P
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Source character set detection
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC Internals FE documentation
  • From: Philip Herron <herron.philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: specialized constructor in specialized class
  • From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: specialized constructor in specialized class
  • From: Frank Winter <frank.winter@xxxxxxx>
• Re: specialized constructor in specialized class
  • From: me22 <me22.ca@xxxxxxxxx>
• specialized constructor in specialized class
  • From: Frank Winter <frank.winter@xxxxxxx>
• how to debug SIGSEGV generated at @plt section
  • From: Da Feng <jvfengda@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Gcc 4.4.4 GPL question
  • From: Shlomi Fish <shlomif@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: handling of long conditional branches
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: handling of long conditional branches
  • From: <chandrakumar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Gcc 4.4.4 GPL question
  • From: xiaoyi wang <xyaswang@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling gcc with a chicken-and-egg situation
  • From: Philip Herron <herron.philip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• problem detected when compiling gmp/mpfr ahead of gcc-4.3.5
  • From: "Eric Fernandez" <efernandez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Code coverage for _constructor()/_destructor()'s?
  • From: Jay Vaughan <jay.vaughan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling gcc with a chicken-and-egg situation
  • From: "Eric Fernandez" <efernandez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Regression Failures after defining TARGET_VECTOR_MODE_SUPPORTED_P
  • From: Ina Pandit <Ina.Pandit@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Source character set detection
  • From: gcc-help@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: warning about uinitialized variable seems unjustified
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Errors while installing gcc-4.5.0 on lucid lynx
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• warning about uinitialized variable seems unjustified
  • From: Christoph Groth <cwg@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Errors while installing gcc-4.5.0 on lucid lynx
  • From: sirish m <x01123581321@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Errors while installing gcc-4.5.0 on lucid lynx
  • From: sirish m <x01123581321@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Errors while installing gcc-4.5.0 on lucid lynx
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Errors while installing gcc-4.5.0 on lucid lynx
  • From: sirish m <x01123581321@xxxxxxxxx>