Hi All, This following statement fails in the latest gcc (4.3.3): * ((unsigned short *)ptr)++ = XXXX; The messages are: `lvalue required as increment operand'. It is really a very convenient way of saving to the current pointer and then moving the pointer forward or backward. It is a little complex to replace the statement with * ((unsigned short *)ptr) = XXXX; ptr += sizeof(unsigned short); Why gcc does not support the style? And there is another simple substitution for that? --- PRC Aug 19,2010
