Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > On 14 August 2010 03:34, Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 19:43, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Tom Browder <tom.browder@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >>>> Hm, is that a legit feature request then? >>> >>> Yes. But I have to say that few gcc maintainers are interested in >>> Objective C and even fewer in Objective C++, so it is more likely to >>> happen if you provide a patch. >> >> I understand, thanks. >> >> -Tom >> > > If its a sensible thing to do i might take a look into doing that in a > few days to take a break from my front-end though not quite sure how > much work there would be in doing it, the C front-ends seem to all > re-use code from one another with the c-family code. But who knows it > could be simple enough :). This issue is separate from the re-use of code in the C frontends. This is the driver program--e.g., gcc or g++ or gfortran--not the compiler proper--cc1, cc1plus, or f951. It's not too hard--see gcc/cp/g++spec.c and the way g++ is built in gcc/cp/Make-lang.in. Ian
