brac37 <MichieldeB@xxxxxxx> writes: > Version: g++ (Ubuntu 4.4.3-4ubuntu5) 4.4.3 > > The first issue is actually a bug. What I did was passing an int by > reference to a void function with an unsigned int by reference as parameter. > The compiler did not complain, instead it produced bullshit code. > > The second issue was moronlike behavior. What I did was passing the integer > constant 0 to a function name with two functions associated to it. One was > unsigned name (int) and the other void name (int *). Now the compiler gave > the error that name (0) was ambiguous since he did not know if he should > convert from int to unsigned int or from int to int*. Are you trying to report a compiler bug? If so, please see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/ . In particular, there is basically nothing we can do without a test case which shows the problem. Thanks. On a more personal note, I at least would be more likely to take you seriously if you avoided phrases like "bullshit code" and "moronlike behavior." My experience is that such phrases are correlated with a lack of understanding of the rather intricate C++ language, in particular an assumption that it is simpler than it actually is. Ian
