Hi Ian, I have check the testcode. 1 /* This is from PR c/25892. See Wpointer-sign.c for more details. */ 2 3 /* { dg-options "-Wall" } */ 4 5 void foo(unsigned long* ulp); /* { dg-message "note: expected '\[^\n'\]*' but argument is of type '\[^\n'\]*'" "note: expected" { target *-*-* } 5 } */ 6 7 8 void bar(long* lp) { 9 foo(lp); /* { dg-warning "differ in signedness" } */ 10 } so why this fail On Tue, Aug 17, 2010 at 7:35 PM, Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > paladin tripathi <paladin.tripathi@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > >> I am trying to test gcc testsuite on target in some test cases i am >> getting the following logs >> >> Executing on host: arm-none-linux-gnueabi-gcc >> ./gcc.dg/Wpointer-sign-Wall.c -Wall -S -o Wpointer-sign-Wall.s >> (timeout = 300) >> pid is 15130 -15130 >> ./gcc.dg/Wpointer-sign-Wall.c: In function 'bar': >> ./gcc.dg/Wpointer-sign-Wall.c:9: warning: pointer targets in passing >> argument 1 of 'foo' differ in signedness >> ./gcc.dg/Wpointer-sign-Wall.c:5: note: expected 'long unsigned int *' >> but argument is of type 'long int *' >> output is ./gcc.dg/Wpointer-sign-Wall.c: In function 'bar': >> ./gcc.dg/Wpointer-sign-Wall.c:9: warning: pointer targets in passing >> argument 1 of 'foo' differ in signedness >> ./gcc.dg/Wpointer-sign-Wall.c:5: note: expected 'long unsigned int *' >> but argument is of type 'long int *' >> >> output is: >> ./gcc.dg/Wpointer-sign-Wall.c: In function 'bar': >> ./gcc.dg/Wpointer-sign-Wall.c:9: warning: pointer targets in passing >> argument 1 of 'foo' differ in signedness >> ./gcc.dg/Wpointer-sign-Wall.c:5: note: expected 'long unsigned int *' >> but argument is of type 'long int *' >> >> PASS: gcc.dg/Wpointer-sign-Wall.c (test for warnings, line 9) >> FAIL: gcc.dg/Wpointer-sign-Wall.c (test for excess errors) >> >> >> Could some one explain me what is this "test for excess errors" >> is this run time error or compile time error > > DejaGNU, which is what the gcc testsuite uses, is verifying that there > are no unexpected errors. Failing the "test for excess errors" means > that the test generated an unexpected error. > > In this case the problem appears to be that the test case does not > expect the message at line 5. When I look at the test case in current > gcc sources, I see that the message on line 5 is expected. So I would > guess that you are using a newer gcc with an older testsuite, or some > such mismatch. > > Ian >