GCC Help

• Thread Index

• Re: RTL
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC libraries for working with images/pictures?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RTL
  • From: Chuckdun <martinsfonseca.jose@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC libraries for working with images/pictures?
  • From: thewormhole@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Aurelien Buhrig <aurelien.buhrig.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Helcio Wagner <hwsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH (SOLVED).
  • From: Helcio Wagner <hwsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RTL
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Helcio Wagner <hwsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RTL
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Helcio Wagner <hwsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Tom Christensen <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: RTL
  • From: Chuckdun <martinsfonseca.jose@xxxxxxxx>
• RE: RTL
  • From: "Deepti Sharma" <deepti.gccretarget@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RTL
  • From: Chuckdun <martinsfonseca.jose@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <maciej@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Aurelien Buhrig <aurelien.buhrig.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Helcio Wagner <hwsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC with -g3
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: "Tom G. Christensen" <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Helcio Wagner <hwsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building GCC with -g3
  • From: Amittai Aviram <amittai.aviram.0@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc makefile hello world (linking iostream)
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc makefile hello world (linking iostream)
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: internal compiler error in libgcc with gcc4.7.0
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <gjl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc makefile hello world (linking iostream)
  • From: "Armin K." <krejzi@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc makefile hello world (linking iostream)
  • From: blessman11 <blessingta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• internal compiler error in libgcc with gcc4.7.0
  • From: Gaganpreet Kaur <kang_276@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Aurelien Buhrig <aurelien.buhrig.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Tom Christensen <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• 4.7.1 on Solaris 8 i386 : gnatmake: "xgnatugn.ali" incompatible ALI file, please recompile
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Question about compare rtl
  • From: Aurelien Buhrig <aurelien.buhrig.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inline code generation vs libs
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: LTO breaks exceptions
  • From: "Hite, Christopher" <Christopher.Hite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• inline code generation vs libs
  • From: Mihai Daniel OPREA <mihai.oprea@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: "Deepti Sharma" <deepti.gccretarget@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regarding GCC Optimization flags and a customized profiler
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Regarding GCC Optimization flags and a customized profiler
  • From: Parang Saraf <parang.saraf@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disabling the internal use of long double
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LTO breaks exceptions
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building libstdc++ standalone
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling llvm-gcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Tom Christensen <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Tom Christensen <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Disabling the internal use of long double
  • From: nkavv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Tom Christensen <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• LTO breaks exceptions
  • From: "Hite, Christopher" <Christopher.Hite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Changing GCC's top-level Makefile
  • From: "Deepti Sharma" <deepti.gccretarget@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: "Tom G. Christensen" <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• building libstdc++ standalone
  • From: "Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan" <kannanmj@xxxxxx>
• building libstdc++ standalone
  • From: "Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan" <kannanmj@xxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <maciej@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Changing GCC's top-level Makefile
  • From: Amittai Aviram <amittai.aviram@xxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.7 std::sort is much slower than gcc-4.4.6?
  • From: Kirby Zhou <kirbyzhou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem compiling llvm-gcc
  • From: Delcypher <delcypher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help installing gfortran
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran installation help
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• gfortran installation help
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help installing gfortran
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Nested function - Avoid it in symbol table
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: bdver1 and bdver2
  • From: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Nested function - Avoid it in symbol table
  • From: Sam <samueldotj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Nested function - Avoid it in symbol table
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Nested function - Avoid it in symbol table
  • From: Sam <samueldotj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: bdver1 and bdver2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gnu binutils automatically
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gnu binutils automatically
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• bdver1 and bdver2
  • From: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• fixinclude questions
  • From: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: i686 Multilib Question
  • From: "Armin K." <krejzi@xxxxxxxxx>
• crtstuff.c:300: error‏
  • From: Mohammad Katmawi <m.katmawi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about instrumenting gcc
  • From: Renata Hodovan <hodovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: memmov/memset/memcpy without libc
  • From: Andreas Geißler <setjem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: memmov/memset/memcpy without libc
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <gjl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• memmov/memset/memcpy without libc
  • From: Andreas Geißler <setjem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inline assembly - how to get gcc to clear the full rcx register in x86-64 mode
  • From: Jeroen van Bemmel <jbemmel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: i686 Multilib Question
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• i686 Multilib Question
  • From: "Armin K." <krejzi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inline assembly - how to get gcc to clear the full rcx register in x86-64 mode
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Inline assembly - how to get gcc to clear the full rcx register in x86-64 mode
  • From: Jeroen van Bemmel <jbemmel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: calling a C++ member function
  • From: Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: calling a C++ member function
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: "damodar.sonone" <dsonone@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• calling a C++ member function
  • From: Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about the tls_model attribute
  • From: Hans Wennborg <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about the tls_model attribute
  • From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Question about the tls_model attribute
  • From: Hans Wennborg <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: "damodar.sonone" <dsonone@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: "damodar.sonone" <dsonone@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: "damodar.sonone" <dsonone@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: detecting when an option is not available
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about instrumenting gcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about instrumenting gcc
  • From: Renata Hodovan <hodovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: detecting when an option is not available
  • From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• detecting when an option is not available
  • From: Vincent Torri <vtorri@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gnu binutils automatically
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::vector<__m128i> with non-standard allocators
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Endless "declared 'static' but never defined" warnings with stage 2 & 3 compilers
  • From: t-rexky <gvvn1200@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::vector<__m128i> with non-standard allocators
  • From: Jack Lloyd <lloyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::vector<__m128i> with non-standard allocators
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• std::vector<__m128i> with non-standard allocators
  • From: Jack Lloyd <lloyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Incorrect results from numerical library when using -ftree-ter
  • From: Szabolcs Horvát <szhorvat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross-Compilation to C64x+ Architecture
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Incorrect results from numerical library when using -ftree-ter
  • From: Dario Saccavino <kathoum@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Incorrect results from numerical library when using -ftree-ter
  • From: Szabolcs Horvát <szhorvat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gnu binutils automatically
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc with gnu binutils automatically
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: SuperH target not emitting instructions to use frame pointer?
  • From: Israel Jacquez <mrkotfw@xxxxxxxxx>
• SuperH target not emitting instructions to use frame pointer?
  • From: Israel Jacquez <mrkotfw@xxxxxxxxx>
• Debug info issue with DW_TAG_lexical_block ?
  • From: Mohamed Shafi <shafitvm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: DamienDaG <deusnei-div@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it possible to make gcc detect whether printf prints floating point numbers?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: Václav Zeman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it possible to make gcc detect whether printf prints floating point numbers?
  • From: "Bin.Cheng" <amker.cheng@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it possible to make gcc detect whether printf prints floating point numbers?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: shift instruction
  • From: naga raj <gnuuser.raj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 bootstrap: multiple "declared 'static' but never defined" warnings in stage 3
  • From: t-rexky <gvvn1200@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Incorrect results from numerical library when using -ftree-ter
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• installing an older version of g++ on ubuntu 12.04
  • From: mixpro <ssmixpro@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 bootstrap: multiple "declared 'static' but never defined" warnings in stage 3
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: empty base optimization vs. final class or virtual base
  • From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@xxxxxx>
• Re: empty base optimization vs. final class or virtual base
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• empty base optimization vs. final class or virtual base
  • From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@xxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with ambiguous overloaded operators
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with ambiguous overloaded operators
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with ambiguous overloaded operators
  • From: Arthur Schwarz <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
• Incorrect results from numerical library when using -ftree-ter
  • From: Szabolcs Horvát <szhorvat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC4.7.0 Linux installation headache
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.6.2 build issue..
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC4.7.0 Linux installation headache
  • From: blessman11 <blessingta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.6.2 build issue..
  • From: Ravish123 <ravish_nayak2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using hex in gcc
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc
  • From: jai singh <jaicse86@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: DamienDaG <deusnei-div@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: shift instruction
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using hex in gcc
  • From: dhruv pant <dhpant28@xxxxxxxxx>
• shift instruction
  • From: naga raj <gnuuser.raj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Is this a gcc-4.7 bug or not?
  • From: Kirby Zhou <kirbyzhou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 bootstrap: multiple "declared 'static' but never defined" warnings in stage 3
  • From: t-rexky <gvvn1200@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: David Given <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Understanding Threads
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.6.2 build issue..
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using hex in gcc
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: Thomas Martitz <thomas.martitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Understanding Threads
  • From: parc <gappack@xxxxxxxx>
• using hex in gcc
  • From: dhpant2806 <dhpant28@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.6.2 build issue..
  • From: Ravish123 <ravish_nayak2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: DamienDaG <deusnei-div@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: David Given <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: Václav Zeman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: DamienDaG <deusnei-div@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: Václav Zeman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Rename symbol at link time
  • From: DamienDaG <deusnei-div@xxxxxxxx>
• Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Anup Ghatage <ghatage@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about instrumenting gcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Understanding Threads
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Question about instrumenting gcc
  • From: Renata Hodovan <hodovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Understanding Threads
  • From: parc <gappack@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: geezers <fastsnip-gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: geezers <fastsnip-gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does a target system must support indexing?
  • From: "Setjem Setjem" <Setjem@xxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: avx register variables
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross-Compilation to C64x+ Architecture
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <gjl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Cross-Compilation to C64x+ Architecture
  • From: David Akodes <d.akodes@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.2.4 bootstrap: multiple "declared 'static' but never defined" warnings in stage 3
  • From: t-rexky <gvvn1200@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: geezers <fastsnip-gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: avx register variables
  • From: Gábor Buella <gbuella@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: geezers <fastsnip-gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: avx register variables
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• avx register variables
  • From: Gábor Buella <gbuella@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building cross-compiler for AIX 6.1
  • From: John M Collins <jmc@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building cross-compiler for AIX 6.1
  • From: David Summers <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: David Summers <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC4.7.0 Linux installation headache
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC4.7.0 Linux installation headache
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <gjl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC4.7.0 Linux installation headache
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC4.7.0 Linux installation headache
  • From: blessman11 <blessingta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does a target system must support indexing?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does a target system must support indexing?
  • From: "Setjem Setjem" <Setjem@xxxxxx>
• Re: some questions about GCC's options
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: some questions about GCC's options
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does a target system must support indexing?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Does a target system must support indexing?
  • From: "Setjem Setjem" <Setjem@xxxxxx>
• Re: some questions about GCC's options
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: some questions about GCC's options
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: some questions about GCC's options
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: some questions about GCC's options
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• some questions about GCC's options
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building cross-compiler for AIX 6.1
  • From: John M Collins <jmc@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building cross-compiler for AIX 6.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Arthur Schwarz <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@xxxxxx>
• Problem building cross-compiler for AIX 6.1
  • From: John M Collins <jmc@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Arthur Schwarz <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Warning message with usage of visibility hidden with wrapper class
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Arthur Schwarz <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Warning message with usage of visibility hidden with wrapper class
  • From: Christopher Sigman <c.s.sigman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Duplicated enums building gcc-4.7.0 on AIX6.1
  • From: John M Collins <jmc@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: confirm subscribe to gcc@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: <stephen.mcgowen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: David Summers <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: David Summers <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  • From: Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@xxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Meaning of -fcommon and -fno-common
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Fixincludes machine_name fix overly zealous
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with linking static lib text into specific section
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with linking static lib text into specific section
  • From: Elad Yosef <elad.yosef@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: COMPILER_PATH question
  • From: Chih Wang <wangcyc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with linking static lib text into specific section
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: David Summers <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with linking static lib text into specific section
  • From: Elad Yosef <elad.yosef@xxxxxxxxx>
• Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: David Summers <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  • From: Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@xxxxxx>
• Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Regarding environment variable GCOV_PREFIX
  • From: "Seenivasan, Hinduja" <Hinduja.Seenivasan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  • From: Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@xxxxxx>
• Re: Meaning of -fcommon and -fno-common
  • From: David Given <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Array intrinsics vs do loops in gfortran
  • From: "N.M. Maclaren" <nmm1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Array intrinsics vs do loops in gfortran
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Meaning of -fcommon and -fno-common
  • From: Amittai Aviram <amittai.aviram@xxxxxxxx>
• Array intrinsics vs do loops in gfortran
  • From: Chris Kerr <cjk34@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-3.4.6 installation on RHEL
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: RTL for function marked "static inline" is not generated at -O0
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need help finding Fortran compiler for C64x+ Architecture
  • From: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist.janne@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-3.4.6 installation on RHEL
  • From: "S.B.Sampath Kumar P" <palatisampath@xxxxxxxxx>
• RTL for function marked "static inline" is not generated at -O0
  • From: Ayonam Ray <ayonam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: COMPILER_PATH question
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: COMPILER_PATH question
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• COMPILER_PATH question
  • From: Chih Wang <wangcyc@xxxxxxxxx>
• memory overhead of static const char?
  • From: Erik Rull <erik.rull@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integral type with sizeof(T) == 1 and distinct aliasing class
  • From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integral type with sizeof(T) == 1 and distinct aliasing class
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc and library
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc and library
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to define special requirements for an address operand?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to define special requirements for an address operand?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything? (was: Re: Fixincludes permanence & questions on cross compilers)
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Effect of 'register' keyword on debug info
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to define special requirements for an address operand?
  • From: "Setjem Setjem" <Setjem@xxxxxx>
• Why is fixincludes not doing anything? (was: Re: Fixincludes permanence & questions on cross compilers)
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc and library
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Effect of 'register' keyword on debug info
  • From: Rohit Arul Raj <rohitarulraj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to set default gfortran specs option?
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected compiler error ( error: template argument 1 is invalid ) when using <limits> and using -m32 option on 64-bit system.
  • From: Delcypher <delcypher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected compiler error ( error: template argument 1 is invalid ) when using <limits> and using -m32 option on 64-bit system.
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc and library
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected compiler error ( error: template argument 1 is invalid ) when using <limits> and using -m32 option on 64-bit system.
  • From: Dan Liew <delcypher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc and library
  • From: Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc and library
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to set default gfortran specs option?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Files with no valid license information
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• compile gcc and library
  • From: Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected compiler error ( error: template argument 1 is invalid ) when using <limits> and using -m32 option on 64-bit system.
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to set default gfortran specs option?
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Effect of 'register' keyword on debug info
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Gcov - Cmake - Shared Lib - Problem
  • From: Alex Büchel <kotzerich666@xxxxxxxx>
• Unexpected compiler error ( error: template argument 1 is invalid ) when using <limits> and using -m32 option on 64-bit system.
  • From: Delcypher <delcypher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: blessman11 <blessingta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Warning message with usage of visibility hidden with wrapper class
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Address rejected by TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P recreated in post reload CSE pass at -O2
  • From: Ayonam Ray <ayonam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Effect of 'register' keyword on debug info
  • From: Rohit Arul Raj <rohitarulraj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Warning message with usage of visibility hidden with wrapper class
  • From: Christopher Sigman <c.s.sigman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Files with no valid license information
  • From: "Evan Hunter" <ehunter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Query regarding pointer analysis
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fixincludes permanence & questions on cross compilers
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fixincludes permanence & questions on cross compilers
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Fixincludes permanence & questions on cross compilers
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling gcc 4.7.0 libgcc on Netgear ReadyNAS DUO Sparc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling gcc 4.7.0 libgcc on Netgear ReadyNAS DUO Sparc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problem compiling gcc 4.7.0 libgcc on Netgear ReadyNAS DUO Sparc
  • From: ".uservorname .usernachname" <dokumentarfilme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Query regarding pointer analysis
  • From: Mukta Joglekar <muktaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Address rejected by TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P recreated in post reload CSE pass at -O2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Address rejected by TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P recreated in post reload CSE pass at -O2
  • From: Ayonam Ray <ayonam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help compiling native gcc-4.7.0 on Solaris/x86
  • From: Shahbaz Javeed <sjaveed@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Address rejected by TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P recreated in post reload CSE pass at -O2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help compiling native gcc-4.7.0 on Solaris/x86
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• cross gcc libgfortran mis-configuration
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help compiling native gcc-4.7.0 on Solaris/x86
  • From: Shahbaz Javeed <sjaveed@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help compiling native gcc-4.7.0 on Solaris/x86
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Help compiling native gcc-4.7.0 on Solaris/x86
  • From: Shahbaz Javeed <sjaveed@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -mx32 'unrecognized option'
  • From: Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield@xxxxxxx>
• -mx32 'unrecognized option'
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Address rejected by TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P recreated in post reload CSE pass at -O2
  • From: Ayonam Ray <ayonam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating X32 ABI code with GCC?
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating X32 ABI code with GCC?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Partial registers in asm constraints/clobber lists
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating X32 ABI code with GCC?
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating X32 ABI code with GCC?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Creating X32 ABI code with GCC?
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: Juan Ramírez <jramirez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with order of -lmylibrary flags.
  • From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Partial registers in asm constraints/clobber lists
  • From: Jeremy Hall <gcc.hall@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with order of -lmylibrary flags.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integral type with sizeof(T) == 1 and distinct aliasing class
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: lang.opt
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can a 32 bit GCC running on a 64 bit Intel be made to emit SSE SIMD instructions automatically?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• problem with order of -lmylibrary flags.
  • From: Brendan Miller <catphive@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: blessman11 <blessingta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Can a 32 bit GCC running on a 64 bit Intel be made to emit SSE SIMD instructions automatically?
  • From: Georg GCC user <georggcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: blessman11 <blessingta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Integral type with sizeof(T) == 1 and distinct aliasing class
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• lang.opt
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can a 32 bit GCC running on a 64 bit Intel be made to emit SSE SIMD instructions automatically?
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Can a 32 bit GCC running on a 64 bit Intel be made to emit SSE SIMD instructions automatically?
  • From: Georg GCC user <georggcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a new GCC routine visible
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can a 32 bit GCC running on a 64 bit Intel be made to emit SSE SIMD instructions automatically?
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Can a 32 bit GCC running on a 64 bit Intel be made to emit SSE SIMD instructions automatically?
  • From: Georg GCC user <georggcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a new GCC routine visible
  • From: Amittai Aviram <amittai.aviram@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a new GCC routine visible
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a new GCC routine visible
  • From: Amittai Aviram <amittai.aviram@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a new GCC routine visible
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Making a new GCC routine visible
  • From: Amittai Aviram <amittai.aviram@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: XC32 GCC Microchip
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• XC32 GCC Microchip
  • From: Giovanni <giovanni.nervi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: global object constructors and constructor function priorities
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wundef"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: global object constructors and constructor function priorities
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• global object constructors and constructor function priorities
  • From: Maxim Yegorushkin <maxim.yegorushkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wundef"
  • From: "ml.lattuada@xxxxxxxxx" <ml.lattuada@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with gnatmake 4.7.0 in QNX 6.5.0
  • From: bogdan <bceler@xxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected behaviour printing twice the same variable
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Adding a conditional statement in GCC
  • From: Sam K <anonk12345@xxxxxxxxx>
• Unexpected behaviour printing twice the same variable
  • From: RobertoCesco <ilcescofabbro@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Complexity of gcc compiler
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Complexity of gcc compiler
  • From: vikram_sp <vikramforum@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with strange error
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with strange error
  • From: SteveSchow <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with strange error
  • From: SteveSchow <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with strange error
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Help with strange error
  • From: SteveSchow <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.1: ld cannot find shared libraries when in sysroot
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Missing gnu/stub-32.h and more with GCC 4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Paul Keir <pkeir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc on z/os
  • From: Earl Hodil <ehodil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.6.1: ld cannot find shared libraries when in sysroot
  • From: Zhengxiong Zhang <zzhan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: JonY <jon_y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: Paweł Sikora <pluto@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: JonY <jon_y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Missing gnu/stub-32.h and more with GCC 4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Christian Sasso <christian.sasso@xxxxxxxxx>
• Missing gnu/stub-32.h and more with GCC 4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Paul Keir <pkeir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trouble building gcc 4.7 on x64 ubuntu derivative
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• trouble building gcc 4.7 on x64 ubuntu derivative
  • From: Dylan Evans <floobit@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 compilation under ubuntu 11.10
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@xxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 compilation under ubuntu 11.10
  • From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 compilation under ubuntu 11.10
  • From: mikemodanoxxx <muhkuhxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 compilation under ubuntu 11.10
  • From: John Graham <johngavingraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.2.4 compilation under ubuntu 11.10
  • From: mikemodanoxxx <muhkuhxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Christian Sasso <christian.sasso@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to access initialized values of global variables
  • From: Swati <swatirathi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected C++ program result
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating Hello World Program
  • From: John Graham <johngavingraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating Hello World Program
  • From: Patrick Horgan <phorgan1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Creating Hello World Program
  • From: klperez <klperez97@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected C++ program result
  • From: klperez <klperez97@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected C++ program result
  • From: klperez <klperez97@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to access initialized values of global variables
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to access initialized values of global variables
  • From: Swati <swatirathi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: Václav Zeman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
• how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: G++ could optimize ASM code more
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Christian Sasso <christian.sasso@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected function overloading
  • From: sundararaj reel <sundararaj.reel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected function overloading
  • From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Unexpected function overloading
  • From: sundararaj reel <sundararaj.reel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Workshop on Essential Abstractions in GCC (June'12, Mumbai IN)
  • From: Prashant Singh Rawat <prashant.srawat86@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: PR 53255 discussion
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: PR 53255 discussion
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• PR 53255 discussion
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.3 and std::atomic
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.6.3 and std::atomic
  • From: Shailja Kumari <shalja.rudra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -std=gnu++0x : Compilation failed
  • From: "H.S.Rai" <hardeep.rai@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -std=gnu++0x : Compilation failed
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• -std=gnu++0x : Compilation failed
  • From: "H.S.Rai" <hardeep.rai@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Basic block reordering hampering do-loop conversion
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Basic block reordering hampering do-loop conversion
  • From: Ayonam Ray <ayonam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Side effect of -finline-functions
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Side effect of -finline-functions
  • From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: "F. Heitkamp" <heitkamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Side effect of -finline-functions
  • From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Side effect of -finline-functions
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Side effect of -finline-functions
  • From: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libffi support
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Avoid generating vzeroupper instruction
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Avoid generating vzeroupper instruction
  • From: Gunther Piez <gupiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: "F. Heitkamp" <heitkamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: "F. Heitkamp" <heitkamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Concrete difference between -g and -ggdb
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Concrete difference between -g and -ggdb
  • From: Martin Olsson <mnemo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: binutils>=2.16 is required to build GCC 4.7.0 for i686-pc-linux-gnu
  • From: Mihai Badea <rumburake@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistency between -Xassembler and -Wa option
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: "F. Heitkamp" <heitkamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Inconsistency between -Xassembler and -Wa option
  • From: Mohamed Shafi <shafitvm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Memory Dump in GDB?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Memory Dump in GDB?
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Distributing a .so built with GCC 4.7.0
  • From: calzakk <calzakk@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Yet another
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross Compiler target include directories
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Help with inserting an assignment statement at the beginning of a basic-block
  • From: Sam K <anonk12345@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Distributing a .so built with GCC 4.7.0
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Yet another
  • From: TPDonahue <tdonahue@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to guarantee memory access orthogonality without atomics?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to guarantee memory access orthogonality without atomics?
  • From: Leonard Plentz <veiokej@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to guarantee memory access orthogonality without atomics?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to guarantee memory access orthogonality without atomics?
  • From: Leonard Plentz <veiokej@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to guarantee memory access orthogonality without atomics?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to guarantee memory access orthogonality without atomics?
  • From: Leonard Plentz <veiokej@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Maxim Yegorushkin <maxim.yegorushkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Distributing a .so built with GCC 4.7.0
  • From: calzakk <calzakk@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Maxim Yegorushkin <maxim.yegorushkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Maxim Yegorushkin <maxim.yegorushkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Maxim Yegorushkin <maxim.yegorushkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: redundant option to select c++ dialect options in 4.7.0?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: redundant option to select c++ dialect options in 4.7.0?
  • From: "Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan" <kannanmj@xxxxxx>
• Re: Cross Compiler target include directories
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: redundant option to select c++ dialect options in 4.7.0?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• RE: redundant option to select c++ dialect options in 4.7.0?
  • From: "Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan" <kannanmj@xxxxxx>
• Internal compiler error when using gsi_insert_before
  • From: Sam K <anonk12345@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unresolved symbols which are present in linked libs
  • From: Евгений Фарфель <jenfa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: covariant7.C fdesc_expr not supported by dump_expr
  • From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: covariant7.C fdesc_expr not supported by dump_expr
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with --coverage
  • From: David Tengeri <dtengeri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• covariant7.C fdesc_expr not supported by dump_expr
  • From: "Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan" <kannanmj@xxxxxx>
• RE: redundant option to select c++ dialect options in 4.7.0?
  • From: "Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan (STSD)" <kannanmj@xxxxxx>
• Re: Unresolved symbols which are present in linked libs
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: redundant option to select c++ dialect options in 4.7.0?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• redundant option to select c++ dialect options in 4.7.0?
  • From: "Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan (STSD)" <kannanmj@xxxxxx>
• Re: Still Can't figure out how to install gcc correctly on Solaris 10.
  • From: Thomas Dineen <tdineen@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Still Can't figure out how to install gcc correctly on Solaris 10.
  • From: Andrew Tee <andrew_tee2001@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unresolved symbols which are present in linked libs
  • From: Евгений Фарфель <jenfa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unresolved symbols which are present in linked libs
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Unresolved symbols which are present in linked libs
  • From: Евгений Фарфель <jenfa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross-compiler builds but results fail in crt1.o ...?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross-compiler builds but results fail in crt1.o ...?
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC warning options for numerical programs
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libffi support
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross-compiler builds but results fail in crt1.o ...?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libffi support
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• libffi support
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Still Can't figure out how to install gcc correctly on Solaris 10.
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Still Can't figure out how to install gcc correctly on Solaris 10.
  • From: Andrew Tee <andrew_tee2001@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: g++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
  • From: "Hite, Christopher" <Christopher.Hite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC warning options for numerical programs
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC warning options for numerical programs
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it possible to get unpartitioned LTO with Fortran?
  • From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC warning options for numerical programs
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC warning options for numerical programs
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross-compiler builds but results fail in crt1.o ...?
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC warning options for numerical programs
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC warning options for numerical programs
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Still Can't figure out how to install gcc correctly on Solaris 10.
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Still Can't figure out how to install gcc correctly on Solaris 10.
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: g++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
  • From: "Hite, Christopher" <Christopher.Hite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Still Can't figure out how to install gcc correctly on Solaris 10.
  • From: Andrew Tee <andrew_tee2001@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: g++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
  • From: "Hite, Christopher" <Christopher.Hite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC warning options for numerical programs
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Extra possibilities in bed
  • From: "Violet Mathews" <job@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regarding List of functions
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Regarding List of functions
  • From: omkarkk <omkarkk2004@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC warning options for numerical programs
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Cross Compiler target include directories
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::atomic<> for double
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::atomic<> for double
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• std::atomic<> for double
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to get only C sources from SVN?
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to get only C sources from SVN?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to get only C sources from SVN?
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to get only C sources from SVN?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to get only C sources from SVN?
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Running the testsuite in parallel
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Running the testsuite in parallel
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc with --coverage
  • From: David Tengeri <dtengeri@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Running the testsuite in parallel
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• RE: g++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
  • From: "Hite, Christopher" <Christopher.Hite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about Question.
  • From: Chris Burdess <dog@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling with seperate cygwin1.dll file
  • From: Brian Jones <cbjones1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling with seperate cygwin1.dll file
  • From: Me Myself and I <stargate7thsymbol@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about Question.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about Question.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• SWI relocation error building ARM Cortex-A8 toolchain
  • From: "P. J. McDermott" <pjm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about Question.
  • From: Brian Jones <cbjones1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Attempting changes to the GIMPLifier
  • From: nkavv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about Question.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: meaning if elf section marked SHF_EXECINSTR but not SHF_ALLOC
  • From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: meaning if elf section marked SHF_EXECINSTR but not SHF_ALLOC
  • From: Marek Polacek <polacek@xxxxxxxxxx>
• meaning if elf section marked SHF_EXECINSTR but not SHF_ALLOC
  • From: phi gcc <phi.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Question about Question.
  • From: Me Myself and I <stargate7thsymbol@xxxxxxxxxx>
• No rule to make target lto-plugin.lo
  • From: Ryo Script <ryoscript@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libstdc++ : shared lib names
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libstdc++ : shared lib names
  • From: Oleg Smolsky <oleg.smolsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCJ debugging quesitons!
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: g++: error: -fuse-linker-plugin is not supported in this configuration
  • From: "Hite, Christopher" <Christopher.Hite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCJ debugging quesitons!
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCJ debugging quesitons!
  • From: Me Myself and I <stargate7thsymbol@xxxxxxxxxx>
• FW: SUCCESS! I have the GCJ!
  • From: Me Myself and I <stargate7thsymbol@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libstdc++ : shared lib names
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• libstdc++ : shared lib names
  • From: Oleg Smolsky <oleg.smolsky@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.7 versus non-standard "-f" options
  • From: Ben Liblit <liblit@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross-compiler builds but results fail in crt1.o ...?
  • From: Paul Smith <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.4.x bug in ARM-EABI code generator/optimizer for Objective-C?
  • From: "Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• SUCCESS! I have the GCJ!
  • From: Me Myself and I <stargate7thsymbol@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Sequenced-Before for g++ 4.1.2?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Sequenced-Before for g++ 4.1.2?
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Sequenced-Before for g++ 4.1.2?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• When Bad News is Good for Stocks
  • From: "Elmer Grace" <pascale.terbeek@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Build completed GCJ, anyone?
  • From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Build completed GCJ, anyone?
  • From: Me Myself and I <stargate7thsymbol@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 'error LANGUAGE_C undeclared' when compiling 'gcc/graphite-clast-to-gimple.c'
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Build completed GCJ, anyone?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Build completed GCJ, anyone?
  • From: Me Myself and I <stargate7thsymbol@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Sequenced-Before for g++ 4.1.2?
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• 'error LANGUAGE_C undeclared' when compiling 'gcc/graphite-clast-to-gimple.c'
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7 build problems
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7 build problems
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7 build problems
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7 build problems
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7 build problems
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7 build problems
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7 build problems
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7 build problems
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7 build problems
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7 build problems
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7 build problems
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7 build problems
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7 build problems
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: --enable-languages=xxx,lto. why lto?
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.4.x bug in ARM-EABI code generator/optimizer for Objective-C?
  • From: "Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: --enable-languages=xxx,lto. why lto?
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: --enable-languages=xxx,lto. why lto?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• --enable-languages=xxx,lto. why lto?
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Add assembly instruction to GCC
  • From: Amir Ghanbari <a.ghanbari1990@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Sequenced-Before for g++ 4.1.2?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>