GCC Help

• Thread Index

• RE: GCC 4.7.1 - Solaris 10 SPARC Build - File not found resolved, takes too much time to run.
  • From: "Bevilacqua, Argemiro (Ericsson Montreal R&D HUB)" <argemiro.bevilacqua@xxxxxx>
• Re: Error when building GCC 4.7.1 on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error when building GCC 4.7.1 on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front end development question
  • From: Josh Reese <jreeseue@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error when building GCC 4.7.1 on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error when building GCC 4.7.1 on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error when building GCC 4.7.1 on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error when building GCC 4.7.1 on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Error when building GCC 4.7.1 on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Constructors in the GIMPLE tree
  • From: Jan Šebetovský <jan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Error when building GCC 4.7.1 on hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• how can i give support of '-pg' flag in avr with gcc-4.7.0 to achive the profiling information of source code
  • From: shweta_guptasairam <er.shwetagupta.edu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: .text variable and optimization issue
  • From: Marcin S <msporysz06@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: .text variable and optimization issue
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• [gcc 4.7.1] -O and -Winline produce many warnings about inlining destructors even without the 'inline' keyword
  • From: Edoardo <edo88@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: .text variable and optimization issue
  • From: Marcin S <msporysz06@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: .text variable and optimization issue
  • From: Václav Zeman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Configure options for "target libstdcxx"
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front end development question
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• .text variable and optimization issue
  • From: Marcin S <msporysz06@xxxxxxxxx>
• Configure options for "target libstdcxx"
  • From: Allan Nielsen <a@xxxxxx>
• Re: Optimizer bug, gcc 4.1.2
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Optimizer bug, gcc 4.1.2
  • From: "Duijneveld, PW - SPLXM" <paula.duijneveld@xxxxxxx>
• Q:How to dev SimpleMPP compiler with gcc
  • From: Shigeyuki Takano <syouyu@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7.1 error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
  • From: endian <matthew.deren@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7.1 error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Getting .debug_frame Dwarf info without outputtings all the other debug info sections?
  • From: Matt Hoosier <matt.hoosier@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.7.1 error: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES.
  • From: endian <matthew.deren@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
  • From: Adrian Smith <adrian.m.smith@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
  • From: Adrian Smith <adrian.m.smith@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Questions about the recent move to cloog and isl
  • From: Terry Guo <flameroc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Compiling gcc with -mcmodel=large fails
  • From: Adrian Smith <adrian.m.smith@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Structures on the Raspberry Pi (Debian linux)
  • From: Václav Zeman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front end development question
  • From: Josh Reese <jreeseue@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc make error
  • From: Raguturtle <ragufedora@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc make error
  • From: Andi Hellmund <uagoz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc make error
  • From: Raguturtle <ragufedora@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Structures on the Raspberry Pi (Debian linux)
  • From: Václav Zeman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Structures on the Raspberry Pi (Debian linux)
  • From: Ray Newman <ray@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Template inheritance
  • From: John Fine <johnsfine@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building static libgcc with different flags than the shared one
  • From: Sebastian Bauer <mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front end development question
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Doubt related to GCC Plugin 4.5
  • From: "A. Chahar" <A.Chahar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front end development question
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Template inheritance
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front end development question
  • From: Josh Reese <jreeseue@xxxxxxxxx>
• Template inheritance
  • From: icegood <icegood1980@xxxxxxxxx>
• Very good way to intensify your loving life
  • From: "Lily Blackwell" <incentivos@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to report bugs only seen with -flto?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to report bugs only seen with -flto?
  • From: Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to report bugs only seen with -flto?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: some question about mips mtc0/mfc0 usage
  • From: loody <miloody@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Front end development question
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can weak references refer to a variable (instead of a function)?
  • From: Erik Leunissen <e.leunissen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LIBRARY_PATH Ignored but -L Works in Development Environment Script?
  • From: Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <maciej@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Front end development question
  • From: Josh Reese <jreeseue@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: [ARM] Debug info is wrong at optimization level -O1
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• LIBRARY_PATH Ignored but -L Works in Development Environment Script?
  • From: Adrien Guillon <aj.guillon@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimisation flags for Intel Atom
  • From: Michael Zintakis <michael.zintakis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• [ARM] Debug info is wrong at optimization level -O1
  • From: Mohamed Shafi <shafitvm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Debug info issue with DW_TAG_lexical_block ?
  • From: Mohamed Shafi <shafitvm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Possible bug in gcc/expr.c - expand_expr_real_1()?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to report bugs only seen with -flto?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building a custom front end on x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.0
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Basic question: GCC's installed programs
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimisation flags for Intel Atom
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can weak references refer to a variable (instead of a function)?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Possible bug in gcc/expr.c - expand_expr_real_1()?
  • From: Sam <samueldotj@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.7.1 - Solaris 10 SPARC Build - File not found resolved, takes too much time to run.
  • From: "Bevilacqua, Argemiro (Ericsson Montreal R&D HUB)" <argemiro.bevilacqua@xxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7.1 - Solaris 10 SPARC Build - File not found resolved, takes too much time to run.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.7.1 - Solaris 10 SPARC Build - File not found resolved, takes too much time to run.
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.7.1 - Solaris 10 SPARC Build - File not found resolved, takes too much time to run.
  • From: "Bevilacqua, Argemiro (Ericsson Montreal R&D HUB)" <argemiro.bevilacqua@xxxxxx>
• How to report bugs only seen with -flto?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: What does --with-ecos do?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: What does --with-ecos do?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Building a custom front end on x86_64-apple-darwin11.4.0
  • From: Josh Reese <jreeseue@xxxxxxxxx>
• What does --with-ecos do?
  • From: Allan Nielsen <a@xxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimisation flags for Intel Atom
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimisation flags for Intel Atom
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimisation flags for Intel Atom
  • From: Michael Zintakis <michael.zintakis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Basic question: GCC's installed programs
  • From: Amittai Aviram <amittai.aviram@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc optimisation flags for Intel Atom
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc optimisation flags for Intel Atom
  • From: Michael Zintakis <michael.zintakis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can weak references refer to a variable (instead of a function)?
  • From: Erik Leunissen <e.leunissen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Can weak references refer to a variable (instead of a function)?
  • From: Erik Leunissen <e.leunissen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc makefile hello world (linking iostream)
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a question about -l option
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc makefile hello world (linking iostream)
  • From: blessman11 <blessingta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a question about -l option
  • From: ali hagigat <hagigatali@xxxxxxxxx>
• ERROR: Undefined symbol: .__nearbyintl128 with gcc-4.4.6 on AIX 6.1
  • From: Albert Chin <gcc-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Code optimization: warning for code that hangs
  • From: David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AVX - cast from YMM to XMM without overhead?
  • From: Dag Lem <dag@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Code optimization: warning for code that hangs
  • From: Robert Dewar <dewar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Code optimization: warning for code that hangs
  • From: Robert Dewar <dewar@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AVX - cast from YMM to XMM without overhead?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: AVX - cast from YMM to XMM without overhead?
  • From: Dag Lem <dag@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: a question about -l option
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Code optimization: warning for code that hangs
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Code optimization: warning for code that hangs
  • From: Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AVX - cast from YMM to XMM without overhead?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• a question about -l option
  • From: ali hagigat <hagigatali@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Usage of properties/methods in derivative of template class
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Usage of properties/methods in derivative of template class
  • From: icegood <icegood1980@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 8 i386 with patches le but non-writable sections
  • From: "Tom G. Christensen" <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• 4.7.1 on Solaris 8 i386 with patches le but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AVX - cast from YMM to XMM without overhead?
  • From: Dag Lem <dag@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: AVX - cast from YMM to XMM without overhead?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• AVX - cast from YMM to XMM without overhead?
  • From: Dag Lem <dag@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: RTL
  • From: "Deepti Sharma" <deepti.gccretarget@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RTL
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC libraries for working with images/pictures?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RTL
  • From: Chuckdun <martinsfonseca.jose@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC libraries for working with images/pictures?
  • From: thewormhole@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Aurelien Buhrig <aurelien.buhrig.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Helcio Wagner <hwsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH (SOLVED).
  • From: Helcio Wagner <hwsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RTL
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Helcio Wagner <hwsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: RTL
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Helcio Wagner <hwsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Tom Christensen <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: RTL
  • From: Chuckdun <martinsfonseca.jose@xxxxxxxx>
• RE: RTL
  • From: "Deepti Sharma" <deepti.gccretarget@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RTL
  • From: Chuckdun <martinsfonseca.jose@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <maciej@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Aurelien Buhrig <aurelien.buhrig.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Helcio Wagner <hwsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building GCC with -g3
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: "Tom G. Christensen" <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Can not link to shared libraries with LD_LIBRARY_PATH.
  • From: Helcio Wagner <hwsilva@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Building GCC with -g3
  • From: Amittai Aviram <amittai.aviram.0@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc makefile hello world (linking iostream)
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc makefile hello world (linking iostream)
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: internal compiler error in libgcc with gcc4.7.0
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <gjl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc makefile hello world (linking iostream)
  • From: "Armin K." <krejzi@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc makefile hello world (linking iostream)
  • From: blessman11 <blessingta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• internal compiler error in libgcc with gcc4.7.0
  • From: Gaganpreet Kaur <kang_276@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Aurelien Buhrig <aurelien.buhrig.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Tom Christensen <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about compare rtl
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• 4.7.1 on Solaris 8 i386 : gnatmake: "xgnatugn.ali" incompatible ALI file, please recompile
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Question about compare rtl
  • From: Aurelien Buhrig <aurelien.buhrig.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: Sebastian Huber <sebastian.huber@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• optimizing out string functions when the string contains a NUL
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: inline code generation vs libs
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: LTO breaks exceptions
  • From: "Hite, Christopher" <Christopher.Hite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: Ozkan Sezer <sezeroz@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• inline code generation vs libs
  • From: Mihai Daniel OPREA <mihai.oprea@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: "Deepti Sharma" <deepti.gccretarget@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: error while loading shared libraries: libgfortran.so.3: wrong ELF class: ELFCLASS32
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Regarding GCC Optimization flags and a customized profiler
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Regarding GCC Optimization flags and a customized profiler
  • From: Parang Saraf <parang.saraf@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Disabling the internal use of long double
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: LTO breaks exceptions
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: building libstdc++ standalone
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling llvm-gcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with '-flto=N' on MinGW
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Tom Christensen <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Tom Christensen <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Disabling the internal use of long double
  • From: nkavv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Tom Christensen <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• LTO breaks exceptions
  • From: "Hite, Christopher" <Christopher.Hite@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Changing GCC's top-level Makefile
  • From: "Deepti Sharma" <deepti.gccretarget@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: "Tom G. Christensen" <tgc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• building libstdc++ standalone
  • From: "Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan" <kannanmj@xxxxxx>
• building libstdc++ standalone
  • From: "Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan" <kannanmj@xxxxxx>
• Re: 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Dennis Clarke <dclarke@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• 4.7.1 on Solaris 10: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
  • From: Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński <maciej@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Changing GCC's top-level Makefile
  • From: Amittai Aviram <amittai.aviram@xxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.7 std::sort is much slower than gcc-4.4.6?
  • From: Kirby Zhou <kirbyzhou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem compiling llvm-gcc
  • From: Delcypher <delcypher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help installing gfortran
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gfortran installation help
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• gfortran installation help
  • From: Syed Ahsan Ali Bokhari <ahsan.pmd@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help installing gfortran
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Nested function - Avoid it in symbol table
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: bdver1 and bdver2
  • From: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Nested function - Avoid it in symbol table
  • From: Sam <samueldotj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Nested function - Avoid it in symbol table
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Nested function - Avoid it in symbol table
  • From: Sam <samueldotj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: bdver1 and bdver2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gnu binutils automatically
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gnu binutils automatically
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• bdver1 and bdver2
  • From: Mahmood Naderan <nt_mahmood@xxxxxxxxx>
• fixinclude questions
  • From: Christer Solskogen <christer.solskogen@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: i686 Multilib Question
  • From: "Armin K." <krejzi@xxxxxxxxx>
• crtstuff.c:300: error‏
  • From: Mohammad Katmawi <m.katmawi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about instrumenting gcc
  • From: Renata Hodovan <hodovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: memmov/memset/memcpy without libc
  • From: Andreas Geißler <setjem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: memmov/memset/memcpy without libc
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <gjl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• memmov/memset/memcpy without libc
  • From: Andreas Geißler <setjem@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inline assembly - how to get gcc to clear the full rcx register in x86-64 mode
  • From: Jeroen van Bemmel <jbemmel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: i686 Multilib Question
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• i686 Multilib Question
  • From: "Armin K." <krejzi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inline assembly - how to get gcc to clear the full rcx register in x86-64 mode
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Inline assembly - how to get gcc to clear the full rcx register in x86-64 mode
  • From: Jeroen van Bemmel <jbemmel@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: calling a C++ member function
  • From: Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: calling a C++ member function
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: "damodar.sonone" <dsonone@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• calling a C++ member function
  • From: Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about the tls_model attribute
  • From: Hans Wennborg <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about the tls_model attribute
  • From: Jakub Jelinek <jakub@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Question about the tls_model attribute
  • From: Hans Wennborg <hans@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: "damodar.sonone" <dsonone@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: "damodar.sonone" <dsonone@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• upgrading gcc-4.4.0 to gcc-4.7.0:configure: error: cannot compute suffix of object files: cannot compile
  • From: "damodar.sonone" <dsonone@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: detecting when an option is not available
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about instrumenting gcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about instrumenting gcc
  • From: Renata Hodovan <hodovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: detecting when an option is not available
  • From: Andreas Schwab <schwab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• detecting when an option is not available
  • From: Vincent Torri <vtorri@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gnu binutils automatically
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::vector<__m128i> with non-standard allocators
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Endless "declared 'static' but never defined" warnings with stage 2 & 3 compilers
  • From: t-rexky <gvvn1200@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::vector<__m128i> with non-standard allocators
  • From: Jack Lloyd <lloyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: std::vector<__m128i> with non-standard allocators
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• std::vector<__m128i> with non-standard allocators
  • From: Jack Lloyd <lloyd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Incorrect results from numerical library when using -ftree-ter
  • From: Szabolcs Horvát <szhorvat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross-Compilation to C64x+ Architecture
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Incorrect results from numerical library when using -ftree-ter
  • From: Dario Saccavino <kathoum@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Incorrect results from numerical library when using -ftree-ter
  • From: Szabolcs Horvát <szhorvat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building gcc with gnu binutils automatically
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Building gcc with gnu binutils automatically
  • From: NightStrike <nightstrike@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: SuperH target not emitting instructions to use frame pointer?
  • From: Israel Jacquez <mrkotfw@xxxxxxxxx>
• SuperH target not emitting instructions to use frame pointer?
  • From: Israel Jacquez <mrkotfw@xxxxxxxxx>
• Debug info issue with DW_TAG_lexical_block ?
  • From: Mohamed Shafi <shafitvm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: DamienDaG <deusnei-div@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it possible to make gcc detect whether printf prints floating point numbers?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: Václav Zeman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it possible to make gcc detect whether printf prints floating point numbers?
  • From: "Bin.Cheng" <amker.cheng@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Is it possible to make gcc detect whether printf prints floating point numbers?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: shift instruction
  • From: naga raj <gnuuser.raj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 bootstrap: multiple "declared 'static' but never defined" warnings in stage 3
  • From: t-rexky <gvvn1200@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Incorrect results from numerical library when using -ftree-ter
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• installing an older version of g++ on ubuntu 12.04
  • From: mixpro <ssmixpro@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 bootstrap: multiple "declared 'static' but never defined" warnings in stage 3
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: empty base optimization vs. final class or virtual base
  • From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@xxxxxx>
• Re: empty base optimization vs. final class or virtual base
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• empty base optimization vs. final class or virtual base
  • From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@xxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with ambiguous overloaded operators
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with ambiguous overloaded operators
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with ambiguous overloaded operators
  • From: Arthur Schwarz <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
• Incorrect results from numerical library when using -ftree-ter
  • From: Szabolcs Horvát <szhorvat@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC4.7.0 Linux installation headache
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.6.2 build issue..
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC4.7.0 Linux installation headache
  • From: blessman11 <blessingta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.6.2 build issue..
  • From: Ravish123 <ravish_nayak2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using hex in gcc
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc
  • From: jai singh <jaicse86@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: DamienDaG <deusnei-div@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: shift instruction
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using hex in gcc
  • From: dhruv pant <dhpant28@xxxxxxxxx>
• shift instruction
  • From: naga raj <gnuuser.raj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Is this a gcc-4.7 bug or not?
  • From: Kirby Zhou <kirbyzhou@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 bootstrap: multiple "declared 'static' but never defined" warnings in stage 3
  • From: t-rexky <gvvn1200@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: David Given <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Understanding Threads
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc 4.6.2 build issue..
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: using hex in gcc
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: Thomas Martitz <thomas.martitz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Understanding Threads
  • From: parc <gappack@xxxxxxxx>
• using hex in gcc
  • From: dhpant2806 <dhpant28@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc 4.6.2 build issue..
  • From: Ravish123 <ravish_nayak2003@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: DamienDaG <deusnei-div@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: David Given <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: Václav Zeman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: DamienDaG <deusnei-div@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Rename symbol at link time
  • From: Václav Zeman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Rename symbol at link time
  • From: DamienDaG <deusnei-div@xxxxxxxx>
• Building and Installing gcc-4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Anup Ghatage <ghatage@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Question about instrumenting gcc
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Understanding Threads
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Question about instrumenting gcc
  • From: Renata Hodovan <hodovan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Understanding Threads
  • From: parc <gappack@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: geezers <fastsnip-gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: geezers <fastsnip-gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does a target system must support indexing?
  • From: "Setjem Setjem" <Setjem@xxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: avx register variables
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross-Compilation to C64x+ Architecture
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <gjl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Cross-Compilation to C64x+ Architecture
  • From: David Akodes <d.akodes@xxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.2.4 bootstrap: multiple "declared 'static' but never defined" warnings in stage 3
  • From: t-rexky <gvvn1200@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: geezers <fastsnip-gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: avx register variables
  • From: Gábor Buella <gbuella@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• missing libraries under Kubuntu 12.04, 64 bit
  • From: geezers <fastsnip-gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: avx register variables
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• avx register variables
  • From: Gábor Buella <gbuella@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building cross-compiler for AIX 6.1
  • From: John M Collins <jmc@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building cross-compiler for AIX 6.1
  • From: David Summers <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: David Summers <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC4.7.0 Linux installation headache
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC4.7.0 Linux installation headache
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <gjl@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC4.7.0 Linux installation headache
  • From: Bob Plantz <plantz@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC4.7.0 Linux installation headache
  • From: blessman11 <blessingta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does a target system must support indexing?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does a target system must support indexing?
  • From: "Setjem Setjem" <Setjem@xxxxxx>
• Re: some questions about GCC's options
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: some questions about GCC's options
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Does a target system must support indexing?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Does a target system must support indexing?
  • From: "Setjem Setjem" <Setjem@xxxxxx>
• Re: some questions about GCC's options
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: some questions about GCC's options
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: some questions about GCC's options
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: some questions about GCC's options
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• some questions about GCC's options
  • From: ohav chochmah <philomath868@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building cross-compiler for AIX 6.1
  • From: John M Collins <jmc@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem building cross-compiler for AIX 6.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Arthur Schwarz <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@xxxxxx>
• Problem building cross-compiler for AIX 6.1
  • From: John M Collins <jmc@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Arthur Schwarz <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Warning message with usage of visibility hidden with wrapper class
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Run-time error with virtual function w/o invocation
  • From: Arthur Schwarz <aschwarz1309@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Warning message with usage of visibility hidden with wrapper class
  • From: Christopher Sigman <c.s.sigman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Duplicated enums building gcc-4.7.0 on AIX6.1
  • From: John M Collins <jmc@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: confirm subscribe to gcc@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • From: <stephen.mcgowen@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: David Summers <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: David Summers <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  • From: Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@xxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Meaning of -fcommon and -fno-common
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Fixincludes machine_name fix overly zealous
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with linking static lib text into specific section
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with linking static lib text into specific section
  • From: Elad Yosef <elad.yosef@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: COMPILER_PATH question
  • From: Chih Wang <wangcyc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with linking static lib text into specific section
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: David Summers <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem with linking static lib text into specific section
  • From: Elad Yosef <elad.yosef@xxxxxxxxx>
• Toolchain compilation problems
  • From: David Summers <gmane@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  • From: Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@xxxxxx>
• Re: Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Regarding environment variable GCOV_PREFIX
  • From: "Seenivasan, Hinduja" <Hinduja.Seenivasan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Optimization attributes const vs. pure
  • From: Johannes Bauer <dfnsonfsduifb@xxxxxx>
• Re: Meaning of -fcommon and -fno-common
  • From: David Given <dg@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Array intrinsics vs do loops in gfortran
  • From: "N.M. Maclaren" <nmm1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Array intrinsics vs do loops in gfortran
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Meaning of -fcommon and -fno-common
  • From: Amittai Aviram <amittai.aviram@xxxxxxxx>
• Array intrinsics vs do loops in gfortran
  • From: Chris Kerr <cjk34@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-3.4.6 installation on RHEL
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: RTL for function marked "static inline" is not generated at -O0
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Need help finding Fortran compiler for C64x+ Architecture
  • From: Janne Blomqvist <blomqvist.janne@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-3.4.6 installation on RHEL
  • From: "S.B.Sampath Kumar P" <palatisampath@xxxxxxxxx>
• RTL for function marked "static inline" is not generated at -O0
  • From: Ayonam Ray <ayonam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: COMPILER_PATH question
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: COMPILER_PATH question
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• COMPILER_PATH question
  • From: Chih Wang <wangcyc@xxxxxxxxx>
• memory overhead of static const char?
  • From: Erik Rull <erik.rull@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integral type with sizeof(T) == 1 and distinct aliasing class
  • From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integral type with sizeof(T) == 1 and distinct aliasing class
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc and library
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc and library
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything?
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to define special requirements for an address operand?
  • From: Georg-Johann Lay <avr@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to define special requirements for an address operand?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Why is fixincludes not doing anything? (was: Re: Fixincludes permanence & questions on cross compilers)
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Effect of 'register' keyword on debug info
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to define special requirements for an address operand?
  • From: "Setjem Setjem" <Setjem@xxxxxx>
• Why is fixincludes not doing anything? (was: Re: Fixincludes permanence & questions on cross compilers)
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc and library
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Effect of 'register' keyword on debug info
  • From: Rohit Arul Raj <rohitarulraj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to set default gfortran specs option?
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected compiler error ( error: template argument 1 is invalid ) when using <limits> and using -m32 option on 64-bit system.
  • From: Delcypher <delcypher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected compiler error ( error: template argument 1 is invalid ) when using <limits> and using -m32 option on 64-bit system.
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc and library
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected compiler error ( error: template argument 1 is invalid ) when using <limits> and using -m32 option on 64-bit system.
  • From: Dan Liew <delcypher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc and library
  • From: Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: compile gcc and library
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to set default gfortran specs option?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Files with no valid license information
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• compile gcc and library
  • From: Xin Tong <xerox.time.tech@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected compiler error ( error: template argument 1 is invalid ) when using <limits> and using -m32 option on 64-bit system.
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• How to set default gfortran specs option?
  • From: xunxun <xunxun1982@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Effect of 'register' keyword on debug info
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Gcov - Cmake - Shared Lib - Problem
  • From: Alex Büchel <kotzerich666@xxxxxxxx>
• Unexpected compiler error ( error: template argument 1 is invalid ) when using <limits> and using -m32 option on 64-bit system.
  • From: Delcypher <delcypher@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: blessman11 <blessingta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Warning message with usage of visibility hidden with wrapper class
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Address rejected by TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P recreated in post reload CSE pass at -O2
  • From: Ayonam Ray <ayonam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Effect of 'register' keyword on debug info
  • From: Rohit Arul Raj <rohitarulraj@xxxxxxxxx>
• Warning message with usage of visibility hidden with wrapper class
  • From: Christopher Sigman <c.s.sigman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Files with no valid license information
  • From: "Evan Hunter" <ehunter@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Query regarding pointer analysis
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fixincludes permanence & questions on cross compilers
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Fixincludes permanence & questions on cross compilers
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Fixincludes permanence & questions on cross compilers
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling gcc 4.7.0 libgcc on Netgear ReadyNAS DUO Sparc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Problem compiling gcc 4.7.0 libgcc on Netgear ReadyNAS DUO Sparc
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Problem compiling gcc 4.7.0 libgcc on Netgear ReadyNAS DUO Sparc
  • From: ".uservorname .usernachname" <dokumentarfilme@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Query regarding pointer analysis
  • From: Mukta Joglekar <muktaj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Address rejected by TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P recreated in post reload CSE pass at -O2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Address rejected by TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P recreated in post reload CSE pass at -O2
  • From: Ayonam Ray <ayonam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help compiling native gcc-4.7.0 on Solaris/x86
  • From: Shahbaz Javeed <sjaveed@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Address rejected by TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P recreated in post reload CSE pass at -O2
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help compiling native gcc-4.7.0 on Solaris/x86
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• cross gcc libgfortran mis-configuration
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help compiling native gcc-4.7.0 on Solaris/x86
  • From: Shahbaz Javeed <sjaveed@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help compiling native gcc-4.7.0 on Solaris/x86
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Help compiling native gcc-4.7.0 on Solaris/x86
  • From: Shahbaz Javeed <sjaveed@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -mx32 'unrecognized option'
  • From: Ryan Mansfield <rmansfield@xxxxxxx>
• -mx32 'unrecognized option'
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Address rejected by TARGET_LEGITIMATE_ADDRESS_P recreated in post reload CSE pass at -O2
  • From: Ayonam Ray <ayonam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating X32 ABI code with GCC?
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating X32 ABI code with GCC?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Partial registers in asm constraints/clobber lists
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating X32 ABI code with GCC?
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating X32 ABI code with GCC?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Creating X32 ABI code with GCC?
  • From: Vincent Diepeveen <diep@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: Juan Ramírez <jramirez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with order of -lmylibrary flags.
  • From: "Kevin P. Fleming" <kpfleming@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Partial registers in asm constraints/clobber lists
  • From: Jeremy Hall <gcc.hall@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: problem with order of -lmylibrary flags.
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Integral type with sizeof(T) == 1 and distinct aliasing class
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: lang.opt
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can a 32 bit GCC running on a 64 bit Intel be made to emit SSE SIMD instructions automatically?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• problem with order of -lmylibrary flags.
  • From: Brendan Miller <catphive@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: blessman11 <blessingta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Can a 32 bit GCC running on a 64 bit Intel be made to emit SSE SIMD instructions automatically?
  • From: Georg GCC user <georggcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Creating makefiles in gcc4.7.0
  • From: blessman11 <blessingta@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Integral type with sizeof(T) == 1 and distinct aliasing class
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• lang.opt
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can a 32 bit GCC running on a 64 bit Intel be made to emit SSE SIMD instructions automatically?
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Can a 32 bit GCC running on a 64 bit Intel be made to emit SSE SIMD instructions automatically?
  • From: Georg GCC user <georggcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a new GCC routine visible
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Can a 32 bit GCC running on a 64 bit Intel be made to emit SSE SIMD instructions automatically?
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Can a 32 bit GCC running on a 64 bit Intel be made to emit SSE SIMD instructions automatically?
  • From: Georg GCC user <georggcc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a new GCC routine visible
  • From: Amittai Aviram <amittai.aviram@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a new GCC routine visible
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a new GCC routine visible
  • From: Amittai Aviram <amittai.aviram@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Making a new GCC routine visible
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Making a new GCC routine visible
  • From: Amittai Aviram <amittai.aviram@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: XC32 GCC Microchip
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• XC32 GCC Microchip
  • From: Giovanni <giovanni.nervi@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: global object constructors and constructor function priorities
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wundef"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: global object constructors and constructor function priorities
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• global object constructors and constructor function priorities
  • From: Maxim Yegorushkin <maxim.yegorushkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wundef"
  • From: "ml.lattuada@xxxxxxxxx" <ml.lattuada@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Florian Weimer <fw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Problem with gnatmake 4.7.0 in QNX 6.5.0
  • From: bogdan <bceler@xxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected behaviour printing twice the same variable
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Adding a conditional statement in GCC
  • From: Sam K <anonk12345@xxxxxxxxx>
• Unexpected behaviour printing twice the same variable
  • From: RobertoCesco <ilcescofabbro@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: Complexity of gcc compiler
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Complexity of gcc compiler
  • From: vikram_sp <vikramforum@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with strange error
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with strange error
  • From: SteveSchow <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with strange error
  • From: SteveSchow <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Help with strange error
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Help with strange error
  • From: SteveSchow <steve@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Segher Boessenkool <segher@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Vincent Lefevre <vincent+gcc@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How do I disable warnings across versions?
  • From: Andy Lutomirski <luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.1: ld cannot find shared libraries when in sysroot
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: Missing gnu/stub-32.h and more with GCC 4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Paul Keir <pkeir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc on z/os
  • From: Earl Hodil <ehodil@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.6.1: ld cannot find shared libraries when in sysroot
  • From: Zhengxiong Zhang <zzhan@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: JonY <jon_y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: Paweł Sikora <pluto@xxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: JonY <jon_y@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Missing gnu/stub-32.h and more with GCC 4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Christian Sasso <christian.sasso@xxxxxxxxx>
• Missing gnu/stub-32.h and more with GCC 4.7.0 on Ubuntu 12.04
  • From: Paul Keir <pkeir@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trouble building gcc 4.7 on x64 ubuntu derivative
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• trouble building gcc 4.7 on x64 ubuntu derivative
  • From: Dylan Evans <floobit@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 compilation under ubuntu 11.10
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Kalle Olavi Niemitalo <kon@xxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 compilation under ubuntu 11.10
  • From: Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopezibanez@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 compilation under ubuntu 11.10
  • From: mikemodanoxxx <muhkuhxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.2.4 compilation under ubuntu 11.10
  • From: John Graham <johngavingraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.2.4 compilation under ubuntu 11.10
  • From: mikemodanoxxx <muhkuhxxx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Christian Sasso <christian.sasso@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to access initialized values of global variables
  • From: Swati <swatirathi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected C++ program result
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating Hello World Program
  • From: John Graham <johngavingraham@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Creating Hello World Program
  • From: Patrick Horgan <phorgan1@xxxxxxxxx>
• Creating Hello World Program
  • From: klperez <klperez97@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected C++ program result
  • From: klperez <klperez97@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected C++ program result
  • From: klperez <klperez97@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to access initialized values of global variables
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to access initialized values of global variables
  • From: Swati <swatirathi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: Václav Zeman <vhaisman@xxxxxxxxx>
• how to disable __thiscall on MinGW-gcc-4.7.x ?
  • From: niXman <i.nixman@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: G++ could optimize ASM code more
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• About gcc 3.4.3, the cleanup attribute, and the no-attributes flag
  • From: Christian Sasso <christian.sasso@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected function overloading
  • From: sundararaj reel <sundararaj.reel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unexpected function overloading
  • From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.6.2 C++ thread cancellation issue
  • From: Mike Dalpee <mikedalpee@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Unexpected function overloading
  • From: sundararaj reel <sundararaj.reel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Workshop on Essential Abstractions in GCC (June'12, Mumbai IN)
  • From: Prashant Singh Rawat <prashant.srawat86@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: PR 53255 discussion
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: PR 53255 discussion
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• PR 53255 discussion
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: GCC 4.6.3 and std::atomic
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• GCC 4.6.3 and std::atomic
  • From: Shailja Kumari <shalja.rudra@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -std=gnu++0x : Compilation failed
  • From: "H.S.Rai" <hardeep.rai@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: -std=gnu++0x : Compilation failed
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• -std=gnu++0x : Compilation failed
  • From: "H.S.Rai" <hardeep.rai@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Basic block reordering hampering do-loop conversion
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Basic block reordering hampering do-loop conversion
  • From: Ayonam Ray <ayonam@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Side effect of -finline-functions
  • From: Tim Prince <n8tm@xxxxxxx>
• Re: Side effect of -finline-functions
  • From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: "F. Heitkamp" <heitkamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Side effect of -finline-functions
  • From: Alexander Monakov <amonakov@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Side effect of -finline-functions
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Side effect of -finline-functions
  • From: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: libffi support
  • From: Philip Herron <redbrain@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Avoid generating vzeroupper instruction
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Avoid generating vzeroupper instruction
  • From: Gunther Piez <gupiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: "F. Heitkamp" <heitkamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: "F. Heitkamp" <heitkamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Concrete difference between -g and -ggdb
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Concrete difference between -g and -ggdb
  • From: Martin Olsson <mnemo@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Fwd: binutils>=2.16 is required to build GCC 4.7.0 for i686-pc-linux-gnu
  • From: Mihai Badea <rumburake@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Inconsistency between -Xassembler and -Wa option
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• g++ libstdc++ linker question.
  • From: "F. Heitkamp" <heitkamp@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Inconsistency between -Xassembler and -Wa option
  • From: Mohamed Shafi <shafitvm@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Memory Dump in GDB?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Memory Dump in GDB?
  • From: Hei Chan <structurechart@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ángel González <keisial@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Jeffrey Walton <noloader@xxxxxxxxx>
• trying to build a DLL on Windows 7 gcc using 3rd party libraries
  • From: Ray Holme <rayholme@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Distributing a .so built with GCC 4.7.0
  • From: calzakk <calzakk@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Yet another
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Cross Compiler target include directories
  • From: rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Help with inserting an assignment statement at the beginning of a basic-block
  • From: Sam K <anonk12345@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Distributing a .so built with GCC 4.7.0
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Yet another
  • From: TPDonahue <tdonahue@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to guarantee memory access orthogonality without atomics?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to guarantee memory access orthogonality without atomics?
  • From: Leonard Plentz <veiokej@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to guarantee memory access orthogonality without atomics?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to guarantee memory access orthogonality without atomics?
  • From: Leonard Plentz <veiokej@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: How to guarantee memory access orthogonality without atomics?
  • From: Andrew Haley <aph@xxxxxxxxxx>
• How to guarantee memory access orthogonality without atomics?
  • From: Leonard Plentz <veiokej@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Maxim Yegorushkin <maxim.yegorushkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• Distributing a .so built with GCC 4.7.0
  • From: calzakk <calzakk@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Maxim Yegorushkin <maxim.yegorushkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Maxim Yegorushkin <maxim.yegorushkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>
• gcc-4.7.0 error "ar: Cannot find plugin"
  • From: Maxim Yegorushkin <maxim.yegorushkin@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: redundant option to select c++ dialect options in 4.7.0?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely <jwakely.gcc@xxxxxxxxx>
• RE: redundant option to select c++ dialect options in 4.7.0?
  • From: "Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan" <kannanmj@xxxxxx>
• Re: Cross Compiler target include directories
  • From: Kai Ruottu <kai.ruottu@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• RE: redundant option to select c++ dialect options in 4.7.0?
  • From: Marc Glisse <marc.glisse@xxxxxxxx>
• RE: redundant option to select c++ dialect options in 4.7.0?
  • From: "Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan" <kannanmj@xxxxxx>
• Internal compiler error when using gsi_insert_before
  • From: Sam K <anonk12345@xxxxxxxxx>
• Re: Unresolved symbols which are present in linked libs
  • From: Евгений Фарфель <jenfa@xxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: covariant7.C fdesc_expr not supported by dump_expr
  • From: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Re: covariant7.C fdesc_expr not supported by dump_expr
  • From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant@xxxxxxxxxx>