rbmj <rbmj@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > As a bit of a hack (though IMHO less of a hack then just disabling the > whole system), I disabled the machine_name fix and re-enabled > fixincludes with the attached patch, as I *need* to change the header > files to get gcc targeting vxworks to compile, and these are not > changes that are easily accommodated with changes to GCC. If I apply > the patch, regenerate gcc/configure, and do a clean build fixincludes > runs and the build finishes without errors. The configure/build also > works for a normal, native build. Should I submit to -patches, in > anticipation of submitting the hacks necessary to get a build without > manually patching the headers? Or is this not the right approach? Yes, please do send to gcc-patches. You should CC nathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, who is the maintainer of the GCC VxWorks port. Thanks! Ian
