klperez wrote: > > Hello Mattia, I am glad your question was sort of answered. Given his > answer it seems to me that gcc breaks the rules of polymorphism, because > it does not allow multiple inherited objects to be treated like their base > class. Clearly one should not have Final objects be stored in a > dynamically allocated array of base classes, but is there a way to store > them in a different way without leaking memory? For example could one use > a std vector, which stores three Final objects, and then calls clear when > it comes time to delete them? > > Sorry for hijacking your question, and I hope that someone is able to > answer. > > Kevin > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Unexpected-C%2B%2B-program-result-tp33280210p33763653.html Sent from the gcc - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
