Fedora Development Discussion
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update
From
: Parag N(पराग़)
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update
From
: Roland McGrath
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update
From
: Adam Williamson
Fedora Release Engineering meeting summary for 2010-02-08
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Purging the F13 orphans
From
: Till Maas
Re: Purging the F13 orphans
From
: Till Maas
Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update
From
: Milos Jakubicek
gnome-applet-netspeed (was: Re: Purging the F13 orphans)
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Purging the F13 orphans
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Purging the F13 orphans
From
: Julian Sikorski
Re: No Frozen Rawhide coming soon! New paths on mirrors!
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Purging the F13 orphans
From
: Till Maas
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Michael Cronenworth
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update
From
: Kevin Kofler
Plan for Tomorrow's (2010-02-09) FESCo meeting
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Purging the F13 orphans
From
: Kevin Kofler
LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update
From
: Roland Grunberg
Re: No Frozen Rawhide coming soon! New paths on mirrors!
From
: Mike Chambers
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: rawhide report: 20100208 changes
From
: Mat Booth
Re: rawhide report: 20100208 changes
From
: Dodji Seketeli
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: No Frozen Rawhide coming soon! New paths on mirrors!
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Iain Arnell
Re: Purging the F13 orphans
From
: Till Maas
Re: rawhide report: 20100208 changes
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Frank Ch. Eigler
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Karel Klic
No Frozen Rawhide coming soon! New paths on mirrors!
From
: Jesse Keating
qt-4.6/kde-4.4 updates
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: rawhide report: 20100208 changes
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Frank Ch. Eigler
Today's Fedora Release Engineering Meeting has been moved to 2100 UTC
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Jerry James
Re: John T. Guthrie III is AWOL - 18 packages for the grabs
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Error getting the XDG_SESSION_COOKIE on F12
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Next privilege escalation policy draft
From
: Adam Jackson
Upcoming Fedora 13 Schedule Tasks
From
: John Poelstra
Re: rawhide report: 20100208 changes
From
: Thomas Janssen
rawhide report: 20100208 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
RE: John T. Guthrie III is AWOL - 18 packages for the grabs
From
: Scott_Collier
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Purging the F13 orphans
From
: Till Maas
Re: John T. Guthrie III is AWOL - 18 packages for the grabs
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: John T. Guthrie III is AWOL - 18 packages for the grabs
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: John T. Guthrie III is AWOL - 18 packages for the grabs
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: John T. Guthrie III is AWOL - 18 packages for the grabs
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: John T. Guthrie III is AWOL - 18 packages for the grabs
From
: Thomas Janssen
Re: John T. Guthrie III is AWOL - 18 packages for the grabs
From
: Paul Howarth
John T. Guthrie III is AWOL - 18 packages for the grabs
From
: Christoph Wickert
Are there big block device regressions or changes in rawhide kernel?
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Eric Springer
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Vaclav Mocek
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Sir Gallantmon
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Karel Klic
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
rawhide report: 20100207 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Karel Klic
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Mail Lists
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Leigh Scott
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Purging the F13 orphans
From
: Jens Maucher
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: drago01
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Purging the F13 orphans
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Neil Horman
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Thomas Spura
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: drago01
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Mathieu Bridon
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Laurent Rineau
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Laurent Rineau
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Karel Klic
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Till Maas
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Till Maas
rawhide report: 20100206 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Leigh Scott
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Retiring gnome-applet-netspeed
From
: Julian Sikorski
Error getting the XDG_SESSION_COOKIE on F12
From
: Mario Chacon
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Iain Arnell
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Iain Arnell
Re: ABRT unusable again
From
: Ralf Corsepius
2010-02-05 - Fedora 13 Alpha blocker bug review Recap
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Next privilege escalation policy draft
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Xerces 3.0.1 is now built - retire Xerces 2.8?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
ABRT unusable again
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Xerces 3.0.1 is now built - retire Xerces 2.8?
From
: Jonathan Robie
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: Next privilege escalation policy draft
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Xerces 3.0.1 is now built - retire Xerces 2.8?
From
: Fernando Nasser
Re: Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
From
: Michael Schwendt
Xerces 3.0.1 is now built - retire Xerces 2.8?
From
: Jonathan Robie
simple build system for personal repos?
From
: Till Maas
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Paul Howarth
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Till Maas
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Garrett Holmstrom
rawhide report: 20100205 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Performing a mass rebuild at home
From
: Roland Grunberg
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Performing a mass rebuild at home
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Richard W.M. Jones
Re: virtuoso-6.1.0, impacts to nepomuk data
From
: Jaroslav Reznik
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?
From
: Adam Williamson
Performing a mass rebuild at home
From
: Roberto Bagnara
F-13 Alpha Blocker Meeting 2010-02-05 @ 15:00 UTC (11 AM EDT)
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Next privilege escalation policy draft
From
: Björn Persson
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Björn Persson
Re: Next privilege escalation policy draft
From
: Adam Williamson
Outage Notification - 2010-02-04 23:00 UTC
From
: Mike McGrath
Outage Notification - 2010-02-10 17:00 UTC
From
: Stephen John Smoogen
Re: boost update status
From
: Braden McDaniel
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Purging the F13 orphans
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Retiring gnome-applet-netspeed
From
: Julian Sikorski
Re: Next privilege escalation policy draft
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Update on packages violating the Static Library guidelines
From
: Adam Jackson
virtuoso-6.1.0, impacts to nepomuk data
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: Retiring gnome-applet-netspeed
From
: Erik van Pienbroek
Re: Fw: Improving metrics gathering
From
: Tony Nelson
Re: Proposal: /lib/init/rw
From
: Doug Ledford
Re: Best distribution for developers? (was Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?)
From
: inode0
Fw: Improving metrics gathering
From
: Matt Domsch
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Proposal: /lib/init/rw
From
: Bryn M. Reeves
Re: Proposal: /lib/init/rw
From
: Slava Zanko
Re: Proposal: /lib/init/rw
From
: Bill Nottingham
rawhide report: 20100204 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Best distribution for developers? (was Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?)
From
: David Malcolm
Re: Proposal: /lib/init/rw
From
: Jon Masters
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Proposal: /lib/init/rw
From
: Harald Hoyer
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Thorsten Leemhuis
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Till Maas
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: inode0
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: inode0
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: pkg-config standards for .pc file location?
From
: Braden McDaniel
library bump heads up: clutter
From
: Peter Robinson
Reminder: Fedora 13 Feature Freeze in Six Days (2010-02-09)
From
: John Poelstra
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: inode0
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Outage Notification - 2010-02-03 23:00 UTC
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: inode0
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Dave Airlie
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Comaintaining a package
From
: Alain Portal
Re: pkg-config standards for .pc file location?
From
: Matthew Saltzman
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Przemek Klosowski
Re: Comaintaining a package
From
: Oliver Falk
Comaintaining a package
From
: Alain Portal
Packaging Committee Meeting Summary (2010-02-03)
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Chris Lumens
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: inode0
Re: REMINDER: Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Chris Adams
Retiring gnome-applet-netspeed
From
: Julian Sikorski
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: pkg-config standards for .pc file location?
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Bodhi borked?
From
: Stephen Gallagher
Re: A comps OpenOffice.org-devel group ?
From
: Iain Arnell
Bodhi borked?
From
: Linus Walleij
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Jesse Keating
REMINDER: Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: John Poelstra
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Przemek Klosowski
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: A comps OpenOffice.org-devel group ?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: John Poelstra
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: John Poelstra
rawhide report: 20100203 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: --host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i686-redhat-linux-gnu ???
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Sven Lankes
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Jon Ciesla
Re: --host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i686-redhat-linux-gnu ???
From
: Panu Matilainen
Re: --host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i686-redhat-linux-gnu ???
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Heads-up: Dropping .la files from Imlib2
From
: Tomáš Smetana
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
review swaps and looking for new (co-)maintainers
From
: Dan Horák
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Christian Krause
A comps OpenOffice.org-devel group ?
From
: Caolán McNamara
Re: --host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i686-redhat-linux-gnu ???
From
: Panu Matilainen
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Thomas Spura
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Ryan Rix
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Thomas Janssen
Backlog of scm-commits
From
: Jon Stanley
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: TK009
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Iain Arnell
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Leigh Scott
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Mike Chambers
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: pkg-config standards for .pc file location?
From
: Matthew Saltzman
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Mike Chambers
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: pkg-config standards for .pc file location?
From
: Matthias Clasen
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Christoph Wickert
pkg-config standards for .pc file location?
From
: Matthew Saltzman
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Mumble's package owner is non-responsive, I wish to take over the package
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Peter Robinson
Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal is AWOL, 25 packages looking for new owners
From
: Christoph Wickert
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
[Test-Announce] 2010-02-04 - Fedora Test Day - NFSv4 by default
From
: James Laska
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*
From
: Björn Persson
Minutes/Summary for 2010-02-02 FESCo meeting
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: chasd
Re: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*
From
: Till Maas
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: KDE-SIG meeting report (05/2010)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: [SPF:fail] Re: <value optimized out> even with gcc -g -O0
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: KDE-SIG meeting report (05/2010)
From
: Till Maas
Re: <value optimized out> even with gcc -g -O0
From
: Jan Kratochvil
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Björn Persson
Re: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*
From
: Björn Persson
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: KDE-SIG meeting report (05/2010)
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Next privilege escalation policy draft
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*
From
: Till Maas
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Matthew Garrett
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Till Maas
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: inode0
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: inode0
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: inode0
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Robyn Bergeron
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Juha Tuomala
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Robyn Bergeron
%cmake_kde4 macro usage, dropping -DCMAKE_SKIP_RPATH:BOOL=ON
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: --host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i686-redhat-linux-gnu ???
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: inode0
Re: [RFC PATCH] use sulogin in single-user mode
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: David Nalley
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Mike McGrath
rawhide report: 20100202 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Purging the F13 orphans
From
: Adam Jackson
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Juha Tuomala
Re: Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Board efforts: scope, concept, and permission?
From
: Adam Miller
Re: orphaning terminator
From
: Dominic Hopf
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Fedora Release Engineering meeting summary for 2010-02-01
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Juha Tuomala
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Juha Tuomala
Re: Fedora Release Engineering meeting summary for 2010-02-01
From
: John Reiser
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Seth Vidal
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: KDE-SIG meeting report (05/2010)
From
: Till Maas
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Till Maas
Re: KDE-SIG meeting report (05/2010)
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: [RFC PATCH] use sulogin in single-user mode
From
: Chris Adams
KDE-SIG meeting report (05/2010)
From
: Sebastian Vahl
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Juha Tuomala
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Juha Tuomala
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Mike McGrath
Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?
From
: Muayyad AlSadi
[Devel-list] Is this patch the correct solution?
From
: Ankur Sinha
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Panu Matilainen
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: orphaning terminator
From
: steve
Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing
From
: Rudolf Kastl
Re: orphaning terminator
From
: steve
Re: --host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i686-redhat-linux-gnu ???
From
: Panu Matilainen
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Next privilege escalation policy draft
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing
From
: Rudolf Kastl
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Leigh Scott
Re: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Jussi Lehtola
Re: --host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i686-redhat-linux-gnu ???
From
: Jussi Lehtola
Two FAS accounts for the same person - permitted?
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: orphaning terminator
From
: Ian Weller
Re: Moving lspci and setpci from /sbin to /usr/sbin?
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Moving lspci and setpci from /sbin to /usr/sbin?
From
: David Eisner
Re: Purging the F13 orphans
From
: Tim Jackson
Re: Moving lspci and setpci from /sbin to /usr/sbin?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Orphaning a few packages
From
: Debarshi Ray
Re: Orphaning a few packages
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: orphaning terminator
From
: Dominic Hopf
Re: --host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i686-redhat-linux-gnu ???
From
: Bill Nottingham
Next privilege escalation policy draft
From
: Adam Williamson
Upcoming Fedora 13 Schedule Tasks
From
: John Poelstra
--host=i386-redhat-linux-gnu --target=i686-redhat-linux-gnu ???
From
: Owen Taylor
Re: Draft privilege escalation policy for comments
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Draft privilege escalation policy for comments
From
: Adam Williamson
orphaning terminator
From
: Ian Weller
Plan for Tomorrow's (2010-02-02) FESCo meeting
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Moving lspci and setpci from /sbin to /usr/sbin?
From
: Paul W. Frields
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing
From
: Christopher Brown
Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?
From
: Paulo Cavalcanti
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: James Antill
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Mat Booth
Re: [RFC PATCH] use sulogin in single-user mode
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: [RFC PATCH] use sulogin in single-user mode
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Gregory Maxwell
Re: Fedora 13 Milestone Reached: Feature and Spin Submission Deadlines
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Michael Schwendt
Fedora Release Engineering meeting summary for 2010-02-01
From
: Jesse Keating
Re: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*
From
: Kevin Fenzi
Re: Draft privilege escalation policy for comments
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: FC12: Hidden files in /usr/bin/*
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: Test Email
From
: Itamar Reis Peixoto
Test Email
From
: Ricky Zhou
Re: Moving lspci and setpci from /sbin to /usr/sbin?
From
: Chris Adams
Re: Moving lspci and setpci from /sbin to /usr/sbin?
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Moving lspci and setpci from /sbin to /usr/sbin?
From
: Sergey Rudchenko
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: James Antill
Re: Moving lspci and setpci from /sbin to /usr/sbin?
From
: Michal Hlavinka
Re: <value optimized out> even with gcc -g -O0
From
: Roberto Ragusa
Re: <value optimized out> even with gcc -g -O0
From
: David Malcolm
Re: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free
From
: Bastien Nocera
rawhide report: 20100201 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Orphaning a few packages
From
: Adam Miller
Re: Orphaning a few packages
From
: Adam Miller
Re: How to take ownership of a package in rawhide branch? - Was: [Taking ownership of the orphaned packages: bytelist, jcodings, jvyamlb]
From
: Victor Vasilyev
Re: Draft privilege escalation policy for comments
From
: Richard Hughes
Re: gstreamer-plugins-bad-free
From
: leigh scott
Re: <value optimized out> even with gcc -g -O0
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Mat Booth
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: M A Young
gstreamer-plugins-bad-free
From
: Bastien Nocera
Re: How to take ownership of a package in rawhide branch? - Was: [Taking ownership of the orphaned packages: bytelist, jcodings, jvyamlb]
From
: Victor Vasilyev
Re: best practice for packing programs that use strlcpy()?
From
: Daniel P. Berrange
Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: drago01
Re: <value optimized out> even with gcc -g -O0
From
: Gianluca Sforna
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: M A Young
Re: Orphaning a few packages
From
: Debarshi Ray
<value optimized out> even with gcc -g -O0
From
: Chuck Anderson
Re: Orphaning a few packages
From
: Vivek Shah
Re: Orphaning a few packages
From
: Adam Miller
Re: burning an iso with gnome defaults -> confusing
From
: Jud Craft
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Mike Chambers
Re: Fedora 13 Milestone Reached: Feature and Spin Submission Deadlines
From
: Gianluca Sforna
Re: Fedora 13 Milestone Reached: Feature and Spin Submission Deadlines
From
: Bruno Wolff III
Re: Fedora 13 Milestone Reached: Feature and Spin Submission Deadlines
From
: Gianluca Sforna
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Garrett Holmstrom
Orphaning a few packages
From
: Debarshi Ray
rawhide report: 20100131 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: Draft privilege escalation policy for comments
From
: Miloslav Trmač
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: M A Young
Re: abrtd not running: applet complains
From
: Jiri Moskovcak
Re: abrtd not running: applet complains
From
: nodata
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Christopher Brown
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Wes Shull
Re: How to take ownership of a package in rawhide branch? - Was: [Taking ownership of the orphaned packages: bytelist, jcodings, jvyamlb]
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Fast-track Nonresponsive maintainer: Frank Büttner (frankb)
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re: Draft privilege escalation policy for comments
From
: Kevin Kofler
Re:How to take ownership of a package in rawhide branch? - Was: [Taking ownership of the orphaned packages: bytelist, jcodings, jvyamlb]
From
: Chen Lei
How to take ownership of a package in rawhide branch? - Was: [Taking ownership of the orphaned packages: bytelist, jcodings, jvyamlb]
From
: Victor Vasilyev
Taking ownership of the orphaned packages: bytelist, jcodings, jvyamlb
From
: Victor Vasilyev
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Braden McDaniel
Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?
From
: Paulo Cavalcanti
Re: Upcoming Fedora 13 Tasks - install images
From
: John Reiser
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Mail Lists
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Mat Booth
Re: Draft privilege escalation policy for comments
From
: Adam Williamson
Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?
From
: Haïkel Guémar
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Mail Lists
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Mat Booth
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Frank Murphy
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Christopher Brown
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Mail Lists
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Braden McDaniel
Re: Beware: Thunderbird (ver 3.0.1) CORRUPTS all email state
From
: Christopher Brown
Orphan ircd-hybrid
From
: Eric Tanguy
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: AWOL Maintainer: John T. Guthrie III
From
: Christoph Wickert
AWOL Maintainer: John T. Guthrie III
From
: Christoph Wickert
rawhide report: 20100130 changes
From
: Rawhide Report
Re: best practice for packing programs that use strlcpy()?
From
: shmuel siegel
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Braden McDaniel
Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?
From
: Paulo Cavalcanti
Re: Draft privilege escalation policy for comments
From
: Colin Walters
Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?
From
: Haïkel Guémar
Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?
From
: Milos Jakubicek
Re: Would you use a programming language with missing features?
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Would you use a programming language with missing features?
From
: Paulo Cavalcanti
No mouse + keyb in X in latest rawhide + fix (selinux)
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Fast-track Nonresponsive maintainer: Frank Büttner (frankb)
From
: Alexander Kahl
Re: Draft privilege escalation policy for comments
From
: Adam Williamson
Re:Re: Fast-track Nonresponsive maintainer: Frank Büttner (frankb)
From
: Chen Lei
Re: Fast-track Nonresponsive maintainer: Frank Büttner (frankb)
From
: Frank Büttner
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: M A Young
Re: Fast-track Nonresponsive maintainer: Frank Büttner (frankb)
From
: Alexander Kahl
=?x-gbk?q?Re=3A_Fast-track_Nonresponsive_maintainer=3A__?==?x-gbk?q?Frank_B=A8=B9ttner_=28frankb=29?=
From
: =?x-gbk?q?Frank_B=A8=B9ttner?=
Re: Draft privilege escalation policy for comments
From
: Till Maas
Fast-track Nonresponsive maintainer: Frank Büttner (frankb)
From
: Chen Lei
Re: best practice for packing programs that use strlcpy()?
From
: Eric Smith
Re: How about firefox 3.6 in Fedora 12 ?
From
: Wes Shull
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
