Adam Miller (maxamillion@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said: > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > <snip> > > Take a random downstream app. (Firefox is an example, but there are many > > others.) Right now, it only needs to track a single version of python, > > or a single auth framework, even if it may be used on any desktop or any > > spin. The implication is that in some sort of future with SIG-specific > > conflicting frameworks, this downstream app maintainer now must be familiar > > with, and handle *all* of the frameworks, even though they're not > > specifcally a part of any SIG. That's sort of a rotten thing to do to > > Joe Random Maintainer. > > > > You could say that the SIG needs to then supply people to handle every > > potential downstream app, but that's also not nice, and is going to lead > > to fun coordination with updates. > <snip> > > I don't think that's an issue either, I'm not proposing we change > anything such that it could cause problems. Toshio was, and that's what I'm responding to. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
