On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 13:15 -0600, Adam Miller wrote: >> >> Your example doesn't work, Xubuntu is still bound to the package set >> in the Ubuntu repositories in the same sense that the Xfce Spin is >> bound to the package set in the Fedora repositories. The difference is >> that we understand that the Xfce Spin isn't a fork and shouldn't be >> presented as a completely separate project. > > This only works if your special interest groups are completely > segregated, and that they agree on how the shared packages work. But > what if you don't? What if the Desktop (gnome) set wants the newest > versions of PolicyKit, of NetworkManager, of DeviceKit, etc.. but the > KDE group doesn't have any software that works with those, and instead > wants the older versions they do have software to work with. How do you > resolve this conflict of interest? Who wins? <snip> I thought the whole point of having a "Default" is saying that it is what would "win" and I was under the impression that had all been sorted out by this point. -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
