On Sat, Feb 06, 2010 at 06:53:31PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote: > > However, in the meantime I stopped reporting crashes via ABRT because I > > think it raises the load for a package maintainer to high while the > > report should go directly to upstream. Bothering the maintainer first > > instead of upstream is not the right thing to do. > > +1, in fact that's the biggest design failure in ABRT (in its current state) > and basically makes it useless. Gathering backtraces is something that needs > to be handled by upstream projects (like KDE does with KCrash/DrKonqi), not > distributions. > > Kevin Kofler > Seems like upstream projects managing app specific captures leads to either framentation of the capture method, or a lack of scalability (1 app per app to collect dumps for that app). Might be better to have the bugzilla maintainers look at xml proxy methods to forward abrt captured backtraces to specific upstream project logging sites. Neil > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
