Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> writes: >> I believe ABRT shouldn't file a bug report unless it is filled in >> properly. > > Yeah, some of us have pointed out that before. > I'm happy about every detailed backtrace I get, but I would be even more > happy if users contributed a tiny bit more and added comments to their > tickets and responded to NEEDINFO queries and gave feedback on Test > Updates. [...] How much more useful would it be if ABRT had a mode where executables that recently reported crashes are subsequently/temporarily run with syscall tracing in the background, so that if they crash again, then recent process syscall history can also be optionally included in an ABRT report? This would not be hard to do with e.g. systemtap. - FChE -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
