On 1 February 2010 19:23, Gregory Maxwell <gmaxwell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 8:10 AM, Mat Booth <fedora@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> On 30 January 2010 22:57, Mike Chambers <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 22:37 +0000, Mat Booth wrote: >>>> Maybe but I agree with Braden: I don't think it's worth it. Seems like >>>> a lot of extra work for not a lot of gain. >>> Running a fully updated system, I upgraded to firefox-3.6 in rawhide >>> today, and it only updated 3 (firefox, xulrunner, and some other that I >>> don't recall) and everything working just fine. >> For now... >> >> Really, you should be using Remi's repository. He has a build of 3.6 for F12: >> >> http://rpms.famillecollet.com/fedora/12/remi/x86_64/repoview/firefox.html >> >> But you mistook my comment. That comment was in reference to >> maintaining two versions of xulrunner. > > > These RPMS still appear to be using an internal copy of libogg and > libtheora which is currently identical to upstream code which is > already shipped in Fedora. > Well, you either want Firefox 3.6 or you don't. I'm not advocating using a package that's not shipped by the distro, just pointing out where the best (IMHO) place to get it from is, if you wanted it. -- Mat Booth -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
