Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:33 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 17:04 +0000, Mat Booth wrote:
> > On 29 January 2010 17:00, Pierre-Yves <pingou@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:59 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > >> Here's where it gets weird:
> > >> 0.6.10-1 then 0.6.10-2 then 0.6.9-4 then 0.6.9-2 seems an arbitrary
> > >> ordering:
> > > It is only weird/inverted when the date are the same.
> > >
> > > Pierre
> > > --
> > > devel mailing list
> > > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
> > >
> > 
> > See this thread:
> > http://www.mail-archive.com/fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx/msg04173.html
> > 
> Thanks; for reference the closest I can see to a bug report about this
> seems to be bulletpoint 2 within
> http://yum.baseurl.org/ticket/7#comment:1
> 
> (sorry; doomed with other stuff right now and thus unable to fix this
> myself).

 I've fixed this in upstream yum, so it should be fixed for rawhide when
yum is next updated there (other releases are likely to stay "broken"
long term).

 For the gory details:

http://yum.baseurl.org/gitweb?p=yum.git;a=commit;h=83ea015350e40b11013dd8d03f07558ea4f4cad9

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux