Re: Reordering in package changelogs (was Re: rawhide report: 20100129 changes)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




Le Ven 29 janvier 2010 17:59, David Malcolm a écrit :
>
> On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 15:45 +0000, Rawhide Report wrote:
>
> [snip]
>
> Looks like whatever generates this report is reordering items in the
> changelog relative to the %changelog in the specfile, but in some
> surprising ways; is this a known issue?
>
> Normally the items in a %changelog are in order most-recent through
> least-recent.
>
> But in this report, see e.g. how 2.2-9 appears, then 2.2-10:
>> audacious-2.2-10.fc13
>> ---------------------
>> * Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.2-9
>> - Let set_tuple_cb() work on a copied tuple
>>   (the metadata updates flood is too racy IMO).
>> - Fix tuple_copy().
>>
>> * Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 2.2-10
>> - Fix tuple_copy() further (it was completely broken as the mowgli
>>   dict wasn't copied at all).

This is one reason I prefer to use the following changelog style

* Thu Jan 28 2010 Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- 2.2-10
- Fix tuple_copy() further (it was completely broken as the mowgli
  dict wasn't copied at all).
- 2.2-9
- Let set_tuple_cb() work on a copied tuple
  (the metadata updates flood is too racy IMO).
- Fix tuple_copy().


-- 
Nicolas Mailhot


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux