Re: simple build system for personal repos?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 23:27 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Well, yes, of course. Also, our non-existent system would have free
> > ponies for everyone.
> 
> The OBS source code has been released under a Free Software license, so in 
> principle we should be able to just set it up. Of course, in practice we'd 
> have to come up with the infrastructure and deal with the inevitable 
> question of how to prevent packagers from starting to offer MP3 plugins and 
> similar stuff in their personal repos due to either negligence (failure to 
> audit the source code) or ignorance (unawareness of the policies). (I think 
> this is the main reason why the KoPeR proposal went nowhere.)

Right, I was actually wondering about that the other day. How do Novell
deal with it? Surely even they don't have a patent grant for every
patent in the world that extends to anything anyone might choose to run
through OBS...
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux