On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 23:27 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > Well, yes, of course. Also, our non-existent system would have free > > ponies for everyone. > > The OBS source code has been released under a Free Software license, so in > principle we should be able to just set it up. Of course, in practice we'd > have to come up with the infrastructure and deal with the inevitable > question of how to prevent packagers from starting to offer MP3 plugins and > similar stuff in their personal repos due to either negligence (failure to > audit the source code) or ignorance (unawareness of the policies). (I think > this is the main reason why the KoPeR proposal went nowhere.) Right, I was actually wondering about that the other day. How do Novell deal with it? Surely even they don't have a patent grant for every patent in the world that extends to anything anyone might choose to run through OBS... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel