Le mercredi 03 février 2010 à 13:28 -0800, Jesse Keating a écrit : > On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 22:19 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > A side-effect, is that spec parsers that read the file in a buildroot > > which is missing the package providing the macro, will sometimes think > > the macro call is part of the subpackage %summary. This is > > unfortunate, > > but I don't see how to avoid it without making another part of the > > spec > > harder for us. > > So long as it doesn't disrupt what is viewed as the summary from the > srpm stored in Koji, I think you'll be fine. Unfortunately, I dimly remember seing the macro call appear in the past in the summary shown in packagedb or koji (don't remember the package name, and it may not occur with new koji/packagedb versions). This is purely cosmetic (the actual summary is fine, there's just a strange line after it), but I could understand people not liking it. I'd gladly get rid of the current macro hack if rpm made it possible. -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
