On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 02:22:37PM -0600, Adam Miller wrote: > >> I think the responsibility of these things should be placed upon the >> SIG members who perform the functions from within these different >> groups. Why not have a QA person from each SIG work together with the >> larger QA efforts instead of potentially against them? > > If a spin wants to use a modified kernel package, what's the procedure > for ensuring that it receives the same level of QA as the normal kernel? <snip> That's not something I think would be in the scope of a SIG, nor do I think something like that would make it past Spin review. This would also take the current SIG/Spin outside the scope of being part of the Fedora Project as it is no longer using Fedora packages, this (in my opinion at least) would be a situation where a fork would be needed. -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
