On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: <snip> > QA is a particular skill set, not every sig has a QA member and requiring > it wouldn't work either. I feel it's like assuming that just because I've > done turbogears apps that someone would ask me to do CSS as well. I don't > think it's safe to assume that because someone can put a spin together > that they have the tools and knowledge to do proper QA on it. > > -Mike > -- > devel mailing list > devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > I'm not saying that it should be a requirement of a SIG, but if it truly hits a point where it is not manageable from a QA standpoint to support all ends of the Fedora project then things will have to take a more granular approach and the QA project themselves will have to scope out what they will and won't work on and I imagine the SIGs/Spins will be first on the chopping block (and rightfully so). -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
