Re: ABRT unusable again

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 22:26 +0100 schrieb Karel Klic:

> The script to find backtraces without debuginfo has been written[1]. 

Thanks a lot for your work and for your latest mail as well!

> I 
> placed the list of found bugs to the Fedora wiki [2]. IMHO only bugs 
> with 2 comments should be closed, because 2 comments mean that the 
> package maintainer did not touch the bug (ABRT adds 2 comments to every 
> bug it creates). We can close 129 bugs this way.

This means that the active maintainers, who responded to their reports
and asked for more info will have no benefit from the script and the
ones who ignored the abrt reports did right. Isn't it ironic?

> > [1] https://fedorahosted.org/abrt/browser/src/Backtrace/abrt-bz-dupchecker
> Its 551 bugs that can be closed as duplicates, not 900. I placed the 
> list of affected bugs to the Fedora wiki [3].

IMO all lists should be sorted by package owner. I own ~ 120 packages
and it is a quite lot of work to search all these packages in your
lists.

Regards,
Christoph

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux