On 02/08/2010 02:22 AM, Christoph Wickert wrote: > Am Sonntag, den 07.02.2010, 22:26 +0100 schrieb Karel Klic: >> I >> placed the list of found bugs to the Fedora wiki [2]. IMHO only bugs >> with 2 comments should be closed, because 2 comments mean that the >> package maintainer did not touch the bug (ABRT adds 2 comments to every >> bug it creates). We can close 129 bugs this way. > > This means that the active maintainers, who responded to their reports > and asked for more info will have no benefit from the script and the > ones who ignored the abrt reports did right. Isn't it ironic? Yes, that is unfortunate. However, it is not polite to close a bug in the middle of some discussion. I can go through the remaining 80 bugs and close some of them manually. >>> [1] https://fedorahosted.org/abrt/browser/src/Backtrace/abrt-bz-dupchecker >> Its 551 bugs that can be closed as duplicates, not 900. I placed the >> list of affected bugs to the Fedora wiki [3]. > > IMO all lists should be sorted by package owner. I own ~ 120 packages > and it is a quite lot of work to search all these packages in your > lists. I'll try to do it. Karel -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
