On Thu, Feb 04, 2010 at 11:26:22PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > No, my argument is that the problem this tries to protect against is > purely cosmetic, and is cosmetic in an area which has little practical > importance. That makes it very low in my priority scale. Nevertheless I > would support the fix anyway if it was safe. But it is not safe, it's > trading a problem which has no real practical consequences, for problems > that do have practical consequences. > > It's too easy to say packagers just have to do better, packager time is > not limitless, it's a precious resource people are asking to squander > just because they can here. The day I have three candidates to package > each font the design team asks for I'll support this kind of nitpicking, > but in the meanwhile this kind of "just do it, packagers have to bear > the burden of working around rpm limits at any cost, even for cosmetic > issues" is not practical at all. +1. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc. http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
