Le mercredi 03 février 2010 à 23:46 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit : > Le mercredi 03 février 2010 à 17:14 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi a écrit : > > On Wed, Feb 03, 2010 at 10:55:25PM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > Le mercredi 03 février 2010 à 13:28 -0800, Jesse Keating a écrit : > > > > On Wed, 2010-02-03 at 22:19 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > > > > A side-effect, is that spec parsers that read the file in a buildroot > > > > > which is missing the package providing the macro, will sometimes think > > > > > the macro call is part of the subpackage %summary. This is > > > > > unfortunate, > > > > > but I don't see how to avoid it without making another part of the > > > > > spec > > > > > harder for us. > > > > > > > > So long as it doesn't disrupt what is viewed as the summary from the > > > > srpm stored in Koji, I think you'll be fine. > > > > > > Unfortunately, I dimly remember seing the macro call appear in the past > > > in the summary shown in packagedb or koji (don't remember the package > > > name, and it may not occur with new koji/packagedb versions). > > > > > Easy to check, what's a package that does this macro directly after Summary: > > or %description? > > adf-accanthis-fonts is probably the most recent "complex" font package > but I wouldn't vouch the declaration happens exactly in the same order > in all font packages. The general pattern is the same but packagers have > different tools and habits so slight variations exist. Anyway here is one occurence of what I worried about in all its glory http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=130814 -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
