On Sun, 2010-01-31 at 08:55 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > I think it's sensible, yeah. It's not really much bureaucracy; I don't > > think it would ever be a good idea to introduce a new privilege > > escalation mechanism without FESco knowing about it... > > Right now we're in a phase where a lot of stuff (system-config-*, several > parts of KDE and some other stuff) is getting ported from running the whole > app under consolehelper or kdesu to PolicyKit mechanisms. This is generally > seen as a *good* thing. It'd be really annoying to have to go through a > FESCo vote for every single one of those. That's not intended to be the scope. It's not meant to mean that introducing a PolicyKit policy requires a FESco review; it's meant to mean that introducing *the entire PolicyKit mechanism* would have required a FESco review. Obviously (since you misunderstood it) the current wording is confusing, I will try to improve it. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
