Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > That is your interpretation. I see nothing on this page to support this > claim. And actually it is contrary to format #3 logic, since its main > difference with other changelog formats is that the version is not part of > the entry header, so there's no reason to limit one entry to one version It's blatantly obvious that all these formats have one thing in common: there's one entry per new EVR. Our automated tools (e.g. make clog as already pointed out by Michael Schwendt) also expect that. But I guess I'll need to get the FPC to officially clarify this. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel