Le Mar 2 février 2010 22:11, Kevin Kofler a écrit : > > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: >> This changelog style conforms to the existing spec, it has been in use in >> Fedora for several years, it may surprise you, but changing the spec >> retroactively is not the way to prove your point. > > Uh, the Fedora packaging guidelines DO have the power to change the > requirements, they're not cast in stone. Even existing changelogs can be > fixed. Again, last time changelog was discussed some practises like putting the version in the changelog header were accepted even though they conflict with rpm internals (as was re-affirmed again by rpm people). This is a much bigger problem than your cosmetic issues with my way of using changelog style #3 (which, incidentally, means my changelogs are not randomly reordered so in practice it works better than other styles) -- Nicolas Mailhot -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
