Fedora Development Discussion
Thread Index
[
Prev Page
][
Next Page
]
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: Fedora and Xen: A Quick Start Guide
From
: seth vidal
Re: udev: Directory for custom device nodes.
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: Fedora and Xen: A Quick Start Guide
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: seth vidal
Re: Fedora and Xen: A Quick Start Guide
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: udev: Directory for custom device nodes.
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: udev: Directory for custom device nodes.
From
: Harald Hoyer
Re: udev: Directory for custom device nodes.
From
: Harald Hoyer
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: udev: Directory for custom device nodes.
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: udev: Directory for custom device nodes.
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: udev: Directory for custom device nodes.
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: udev: Directory for custom device nodes.
From
: Harald Hoyer
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: David Woodhouse
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Pitman
Re: Fedora and Xen: A Quick Start Guide
From
: Hans Kristian Rosbach
Re: HAL ejects
From
: Peter Backlund
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: HAL ejects
From
: Paul Ionescu
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: slow hard drives crushing interactivity
From
: Sitsofe Wheeler
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: seth vidal
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Panu Matilainen
HAL ejects
From
: Peter Backlund
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: slow hard drives crushing interactivity
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: slow hard drives crushing interactivity
From
: Bill Nottingham
Fedora and Xen: A Quick Start Guide
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Michael A. Peters
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Dag Wieers
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Dag Wieers
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: seth vidal
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Sean
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: slow hard drives crushing interactivity
From
: Roberto Peon
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Michael Favia
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Michael Favia
Re: slow hard drives crushing interactivity
From
: Michael Favia
Re: slow hard drives crushing interactivity
From
: Havoc Pennington
Re: slow hard drives crushing interactivity
From
: Ed Hill
Re: slow hard drives crushing interactivity
From
: Sean
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Ville Skyttä
slow hard drives crushing interactivity
From
: Havoc Pennington
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Norman Gaywood
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Colin Charles
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: Package Inspection
From
: Mike Klinke
playing with xen...
From
: Rui Miguel Seabra
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Gene C.
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: Packet Inspection
From
: Kenneth Porter
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Chris Adams
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Gene C.
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Sean
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: suggests/requires in rpm - missingOK
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: suggests/requires in rpm - missingOK
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: FC4 with localized firefox (wishlist)
From
: Josep Puigdemont
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: FC4 with localized firefox (wishlist)
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Mike Hearn
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Mike Hearn
Re: FC4 with localized firefox (wishlist)
From
: Christopher Aillon
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: seth vidal
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: seth vidal
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Thorsten Leemhuis
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Havoc Pennington
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Havoc Pennington
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: pjones
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Michael Schwendt
Package Inspection
From
: Roland Kaeser
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Gene C.
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: seth vidal
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Gene C.
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Stuart Children
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: seth vidal
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Gene C.
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: seth vidal
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Panu Matilainen
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Florian La Roche
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Jeff Pitman
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Pitman
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Jeff Pitman
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: seth vidal
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Jeff Pitman
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Darrin Thompson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Charles R. Anderson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Nils Philippsen
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Emmanuel Seyman
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: seth vidal
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Panu Matilainen
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Darrin Thompson
rawhide report: 20050124 changes
From
: Build System
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Pitman
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: seth vidal
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Pitman
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Darrin Thompson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Phil Knirsch
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Florian La Roche
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Farkas Levente
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jos Vos
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Jos Vos
Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Peter Backlund
RFC: Soname in rpm name
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Harald Hoyer
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Tomas Mraz
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Peter Backlund
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Florian La Roche
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Alien Night vs ksh (was: rawhide report: 20050121 changes)
From
: Florian La Roche
Re: Alien Night vs ksh (was: rawhide report: 20050121 changes)
From
: Jeff Pitman
FTP-Download of the FC3 DVD-ISO with firefox
From
: Joachim Backes
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Bryan Clark
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Peter Jones
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: mbneto
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: mbneto
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: environment (/etc/profile) and X
From
: Willem Riede
Re: suggests/requires in rpm
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
suggests/requires in rpm (was: Re: further package removals/potential package removals)
From
: Aurelien Bompard
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Carlos Rodrigues
Re: goals for fc4?
From
: Tom Tromey
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Havoc Pennington
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Alan Cox
Re: FC4 with localized firefox (wishlist)
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Florian La Roche
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: mbneto
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rex Dieter
rawhide report: 20050123 changes
From
: Build System
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: FC4 with localized firefox (wishlist)
From
: Alan Cox
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Alan Cox
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Alan Cox
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: FC4 with localized firefox (wishlist)
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: Power off
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
FC4 with localized firefox (wishlist)
From
: Josep Puigdemont
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Xose Vazquez Perez
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Axel Thimm
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Gene C.
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Gene C.
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: Fedora Core 4
From
: Russell Coker
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Havoc Pennington
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Tyler Larson
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Pitman
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Felipe Alfaro Solana
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Chris Adams
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Michael Favia
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Chris Adams
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jeff Pitman
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jamie Zawinski
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Michael A. Peters
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Felipe Alfaro Solana
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Dave Jones
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Nicolas Mailhot
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jamie Zawinski
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Gene C.
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: removing packages in fedora; nedit
From
: Gene C.
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Alan Cox
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Ville Skyttä
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jim Cornette
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Casimiro de Almeida Barreto
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Nathan G. Grennan
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Miloslav Trmac
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Paul Iadonisi
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: seth vidal
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Paul Iadonisi
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Peter Backlund
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Emmanuel Seyman
Re: kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Jeff Spaleta
kernel-devel: should yum install, not update?
From
: Tom London
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: m g
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: Any known bugs in gcc wrt symbols in gdb and/or var allocation ?
From
: Mike Hearn
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Alan Cox
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Charles R. Anderson
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Alan Cox
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Alan Cox
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Alan Cox
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Alan Cox
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Alan Cox
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: John Ellson
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jonathan Andrews
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Dariusz J. Garbowski
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: RAM detection error: 32-bit int issue?
From
: Matthew Lauterbach
Re: Power off
From
: Nick Bargnesi
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Troels Arvin
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Paul Iadonisi
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Paul Iadonisi
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
rawhide report: 20050122 changes
From
: Build System
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Rui Miguel Seabra
Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Trond Eivind Glomsrød
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Ralf Corsepius
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Hans de Goede
Re: Evolution 2.2, OpenOffice 2.0, Gnome 2.10
From
: Caolan McNamara
Re: removing packages in fedora; nedit
From
: Gianluca Sforna
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Paul Ionescu
Re: Is there a working swsusp for FC3 2.6.10?
From
: Paul Ionescu
Re: Evolution 2.2, OpenOffice 2.0, Gnome 2.10
From
: Paul Ionescu
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Farkas Levente
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Dave Jones
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Chris Adams
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Dan Williams
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Havoc Pennington
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Dan Williams
Re: Evolution 2.2, OpenOffice 2.0, Gnome 2.10
From
: David Malcolm
Power off
From
: Tyler Larson
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Peter Robinson
RE: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Rik van Riel
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Paul Iadonisi
further package removals/potential package removals
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Bill Nottingham
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Any known bugs in gcc wrt symbols in gdb and/or var allocation ?
From
: Kim Lux
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Josh Boyer
Re: graphviz (was: Alien Night vs ksh (was: rawhide report: 20050121 changes))
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: Is there a working swsusp for FC3 2.6.10?
From
: Rui Miguel Seabra
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Toshio Kuratomi
removing packages in fedora; nedit
From
: Marius Andreiana
Re: Alien Night vs ksh (was: rawhide report: 20050121 changes)
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Is there a working swsusp for FC3 2.6.10?
From
: Barry K. Nathan
Re: Is there a working swsusp for FC3 2.6.10?
From
: Barry K. Nathan
Re: grip being removed [Re: rawhide report: 20050120 changes]
From
: Colin Walters
Re: Evolution 2.2, OpenOffice 2.0, Gnome 2.10
From
: Matthias Clasen
Evolution 2.2, OpenOffice 2.0, Gnome 2.10
From
: Trever L. Adams
Re: Alien Night vs ksh (was: rawhide report: 20050121 changes)
From
: John Ellson
grip being removed [Re: rawhide report: 20050120 changes]
From
: Trever L. Adams
Re: Alien Night vs ksh (was: rawhide report: 20050121 changes)
From
: John W. Linville
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Richard June
Re: Alien Night vs ksh (was: rawhide report: 20050121 changes)
From
: Elliot Lee
Re: RAM detection error: 32-bit int issue?
From
: Scott Saccone
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Sean Middleditch
Alien Night vs ksh (was: rawhide report: 20050121 changes)
From
: Dax Kelson
Re: rawhide report: 20050120 changes
From
: Dave Jones
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: RAM detection error: 32-bit int issue?
From
: Jason L Tibbitts III
Re: environment (/etc/profile) and X
From
: Ray Strode
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: P
Re: DM Session cleanup
From
: Peter Backlund
Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Alexandre Oliva
Re: DM Session cleanup
From
: Ray Strode
Re: environment (/etc/profile) and X
From
: Jonathan Underwood
Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Paul Iadonisi
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rui Miguel Seabra
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rui Miguel Seabra
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Felipe Alfaro Solana
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rui Miguel Seabra
Re: Smartrpm was (Re: Fedora Core 4)
From
: Andreas Hasenack
RAM detection error: 32-bit int issue?
From
: Scott Saccone
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: environment (/etc/profile) and X
From
: Jonathan Underwood
Re: environment (/etc/profile) and X
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Michael Favia
Re: environment (/etc/profile) and X
From
: Jonathan Underwood
DM Session cleanup
From
: Peter Backlund
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Owen Taylor
Re: environment (/etc/profile) and X
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Sean Middleditch
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: environment (/etc/profile) and X
From
: Havoc Pennington
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Havoc Pennington
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jeremy Katz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: Smartrpm was (Re: Fedora Core 4)
From
: seth vidal
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jose' Matos
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Jonathan Underwood
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Rahul Sundaram
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Michael Schwendt
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Dan Williams
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Dan Williams
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Féliciano Matias
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Enrico Scholz
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Felipe Alfaro Solana
environment (/etc/profile) and X
From
: Jonathan Underwood
Re: rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Peter Backlund
rawhide report: 20050121 changes
From
: Build System
Re: Smartrpm was (Re: Fedora Core 4)
From
: Andreas Hasenack
Re: Fedora updates CD-ROM?
From
: Ralf Ertzinger
Re: Is there a working swsusp for FC3 2.6.10?
From
: Rui Miguel Seabra
Re: Fedora updates CD-ROM?
From
: Emmanuel Seyman
RE: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Paul Iadonisi
Re: rawhide report: 20050120 changes
From
: Arjan van de Ven
Re: Is there a working swsusp for FC3 2.6.10?
From
: Jason Haar
Re: Is there a working swsusp for FC3 2.6.10?
From
: Per Bjornsson
Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Matthew Miller
Re: Is there a working swsusp for FC3 2.6.10?
From
: Matthew Miller
RE: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Joseph D. Wagner
Re: Is there a working swsusp for FC3 2.6.10?
From
: Jason Haar
Re: Is there a working swsusp for FC3 2.6.10?
From
: Barry K. Nathan
Re: Fedora updates CD-ROM?
From
: Michael A. Peters
Re: rawhide report: 20050120 changes
From
: Dave Jones
Fedora updates CD-ROM?
From
: Gérard Milmeister
Re: Fedora Core 4
From
: Rodd Clarkson
Re: Parallel preloading when viewing from browser
From
: Michael Favia
Re: Fedora Core 4
From
: David Zeuthen
Re: Fedora Core 4
From
: Bryan Clark
Re: Fedora Core 4
From
: Rodd Clarkson
Is there a working swsusp for FC3 2.6.10?
From
: Jason Haar
Re: gcc optimation flags -- was Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Stephen Pollei
Re: gcc -m32 failure on FC2 x86_64
From
: Scott Saccone
Re: Smartrpm was (Re: Fedora Core 4)
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: gcc -m32 failure on FC2 x86_64
From
: Elliot Lee
gcc -m32 failure on FC2 x86_64
From
: Scott Saccone
Parallel preloading when viewing from browser (was: Optimizing for 386)
From
: Martin Olsson
gcc optimation flags -- was Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Stephen Pollei
Re: Smartrpm was (Re: Fedora Core 4)
From
: Michael Favia
Re: XDMCP Core 3
From
: Luciano Miguel Ferreira Rocha
Re: Smartrpm was (Re: Fedora Core 4)
From
: Michael Favia
Re: Smartrpm was (Re: Fedora Core 4)
From
: Andreas Hasenack
Re: Smartrpm was (Re: Fedora Core 4)
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: Smartrpm was (Re: Fedora Core 4)
From
: Andreas Hasenack
Re: XDMCP Core 3
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: Smartrpm was (Re: Fedora Core 4)
From
: Jeff Johnson
Re: Smartrpm was (Re: Fedora Core 4)
From
: Jonathan Andrews
Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Paul Iadonisi
Re: XDMCP Core 3
From
: Jonathan Andrews
Re: Smartrpm was (Re: Fedora Core 4)
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: goals for fc4?
From
: Pete Chown
Re: XDMCP Core 3
From
: Kyrre Ness Sjobak
Re: XDMCP Core 3
From
: Jeff Spaleta
Re: XDMCP Core 3
From
: Jonathan Andrews
Re: XDMCP Core 3
From
: Peter Backlund
Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Dan Williams
Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Dawid Gajownik
Re: XDMCP Core 3
From
: Rex Dieter
Re: RFC: Optimizing for 386
From
: Jakub Jelinek
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Announce]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Fedora Desktop]
[Security]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
