On Fri, Jan 21, 2005 at 11:53:11PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > Pan is still in rawhide; I take it it won't be for long? What are we > > supposed to use instead of pan? Last time I tried to load a large > > binaries group (alt.binaries.emulators.mame) in Thunderbird it locked up > > solid. Also, does Thunderbird handle yEnc (Mozilla didn't last time I > > tried)? > It's entirely possible I mistyped. But I believe Thunderbird and > Evolution both read news. Evolution and Thunderbird are also utterly unusable on a machine with < 256MB, and a slow CPU in my experience, whereas pan seemed very capable of running comfortably in 128MB. Dave
