On Tue, Jan 25, 2005 at 06:11:25PM +0800, Jeff Pitman wrote: > On Tuesday 25 January 2005 08:10, Axel Thimm wrote: > > I only see added value at no real cost > > Quick reminder: if Bug 130352 isn't addressed, non of the above > discussion is very useful: > > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/130352 I agree that this bug needs to be fixed somehow, but in the case of soname-in-rpmtag you don't run into the problem, as the libfooN packages don't share any common provides, neither real nor virtual. Otherwise I would have noticed, multiple libfooN packages have been in ATrpms since ages now, not to think of Mandrake. :) > I think the Bug should be re-formulated into an RFE based on Axel's > Provides(noupdate): foo syntax. Or, maybe Provides(virtual):, or > something. > > But, this is definitely the first hurdle to jump over, then a more > well-rounded discussion on a method for soname rpms can be more > effective. > > take care, -- Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Attachment:
pgpLCNH5JYe6s.pgp
Description: PGP signature
