On Tuesday 25 January 2005 08:10, Axel Thimm wrote: > I only see added value at no real cost Quick reminder: if Bug 130352 isn't addressed, non of the above discussion is very useful: http://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/130352 I think the Bug should be re-formulated into an RFE based on Axel's Provides(noupdate): foo syntax. Or, maybe Provides(virtual):, or something. But, this is definitely the first hurdle to jump over, then a more well-rounded discussion on a method for soname rpms can be more effective. take care, -- -jeff
