Re: further package removals/potential package removals

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2005-01-21 at 23:58 -0500, Jeremy Katz wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-01-22 at 05:51 +0100, FÃliciano Matias wrote:
> > Why do we keep xpdf in Fedora Core ?
> > gpdf works fine.
> 
> gpdf works with a much smaller subset of pdfs than gpdf.
> 
> There's hope, though.  evince[1] will save us all from our crappy widget
> PDF viewing experience.

I've been bought by evince. The speed of it displaying PDFs is
astonishing all by it self. Also, it hasn't had any problem with none of
the PDFs I've got here, and some I had to open with xpdf, other with
gpdf (and a few with ggv).

Rui

-- 
+ No matter how much you do, you never do enough -- unknown
+ Whatever you do will be insignificant,
| but it is very important that you do it -- Gandhi
+ So let's do it...?

Please AVOID sending me WORD, EXCEL or POWERPOINT attachments.
See http://www.fsf.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux