Re: RFC: Soname in rpm name

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le lundi 24 janvier 2005 Ã 16:23 -0500, Sean Middleditch a Ãcrit :
> "capabilities equivalent to competing operating systems"... does that
> not include "install stuff" for some reason?
> 
> The Open Source community is pretty good these days about using sonames
> properly.  It's silly to have packages go and break all that effort.
> Sonames exist for a reason.
> 

I replied to "Fedora supposed to be an exercise in speedy RPM rebuilding, or an
operating system?".

I don't have any problem with libthis0, libthis1, libthat0, ...
If this help, I think this can be a good practise.

But it's not the primary focus of Fedora. This does not mean Fedora
should ignore compatibility issue.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux